Saturday, May 18, 2019

Source of Conflict

Image courtesy of www.theconversation.com

Acting is not an easy job especially if one’s co-actors are not of the same caliber. If a co-actor in a scene cannot deliver the required emotion, efforts of the other actors in the scene will be futile once the director yells ‘Cut!’ Thus, it’s really not enough to just be good-looking or register well on camera. Such situation could have started the feud between Network Actress 1 (NA1) and Network Actress 2 (NA2).

When NA1 and NA2 were starting out in their project, NA1 observed that NA2 was not that skilled in acting. The weak acting of NA2 slowed down production and became frustrating for her fellow actors, as it would take a longer time to shoot her scenes. NA1 became frustrated and started questioning why NA2 had to be part of their project.

Well, no one could really answer that query of NA1, as casting has always been approved by higher management. Once the bosses agree on the list of actors for a project, the production team will have to do their best to bring out the best out of their talents.

To solve the problem with NA2, the production team gave her an acting coach. The coach could only do so much, as NA2 could not settle in her role yet. Her diction was unnatural, and her acting was a bit below the level of the other actors. Unfortunately, her role was too pivotal and her character could not be merely killed off. Besides, the viewers were increasing. The production team had no choice, but to be patient with NA2.

Nonetheless, NA1 could no longer hide her frustration and started to vent out. First, she allegedly questioned why NA2 was given a big break despite poor acting skills. Thus, speculations on NA2 having a backer were raised. Second, NA1 expressed her unsolicited advice that NA2 should just have remained acting in independent movies.

Like typical rumors, NA2’s statements reached NA1, who did not like what was being circulated against her. Soon after, the two no longer spoke to each other and the only way to rid of frustration against each other was to make the scenes as realistic as possible.

‘Word spread because word will spread. Stories and secrets fight, stories win, shed new secrets, which new stories fight, and on.’ ― China Miéville

Please abide by the GUIDELINES in writing comments if you want them to be posted. Initials and comments that are too explicit will not be accepted.

Follow @FashionPulis on Twitter for the latest update. Please continue to send your juicy stories to michaelsylim@gmail.com. Thank you very much for loving Fashion PULIS!

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of Fashion PULIS. The management reserves the right to exclude comments that do not comply with the GUIDELINES in writing comments.

37 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. Wrong0. Y and Y to

      Delete
    2. @ May 18 1:51 am. Ikaw ang super wrong. B and D yan! Si Y and Y oks oks naman umarte. This is obviously B. Kaya parang totoo na mga eksena nila pisikalan.

      Delete
  2. B- NA2 D- NA1 Kala ko mabait and humble si D. Tssssk

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Y and Y to. Wala namang backer si B. E yung isang Y, meron.

      Delete
    2. Kung talent, ganda at appeal din lang talagang makakapag taka how B gets the role. Pang side kick lang tlga sya.

      Delete
    3. Wrong. May ts na before si B. Y & Y ito. Kasi 'yung isang Y sa movies lang dati.

      Delete
    4. B and D. Sa diction pa lang alam na

      Delete
  3. Hindi B & D yan. Napaka yaman ni B.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Pwedeng B and D kasi “her diction is unnatural” sabi sa clue. Yung isa veteran na sa actingan at yung isa di pa ganon kalakas ang aurahan talaga

    Pwede din Y and Y kasi “remained acting in independent movies” Pareho naman bago sa actingan na di naman talaga beterano pero mas lamang sa galing yung isa.

    SO THE WHO?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. mas B and D. cos of the diction. magaling si Y ha. ang isang Y ok din nman

      Delete
  5. NA1 - Y NA2-Y. Iba talaga nagagawa ng may backer, kahit waley sa acting may project.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Naiirita din ako sa acting ni NA2. Halatang halata na siya weakest link sa cast.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Y and Y. Malakas kasi kapit nung isang Y kaya kahit mediocre lang ang acting skills, may project pa din.

    ReplyDelete
  8. B and D. Been wondering talaga bakit si B.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Y and Y. Friends si B and D. Check nyo BTs nila

    ReplyDelete
  10. B and D nay accent daw eh.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Paano magiging Y&Y to e taob nga ni NA2 si NA1? Si NA1 nagkaserye at movie na pero hindi sumikat sikat. Si NA2 first break palang tumatak na mga tao.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Baliktad ata? NA2 yung magaling umarte, nilamon ng buong buo si NA1

      Delete
  12. Hindi B & D yan kasi wala namang independent movie si B

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually meron pong indie film si B.

      Delete
  13. Muka ngang Y at Y

    ReplyDelete
  14. K & T. Kah. Sorry but T is badly miscast in that show.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Not B and D. Masaya naman yung behind the scenes nila.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Y and Y They are not friends.

    ReplyDelete
  17. NA1- Y NA2 -Y. Yung 1 Y malakas ang ugong na hawak ng mataas ang posisyon sa Network kaya nabibigyan ng work kahit malamya umarte. Kbye!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Y & Y, Hindi yan B & D.

    ReplyDelete
  19. If Y and Y nga, wait, what? Eh pareho namang bano ang acting ng dalawa. May pa back-stab pang nalalaman. Lol.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. bulag ka ateng. sobrang galing kaya ni Y dun and pretty nya pa

      Delete
  20. Sinong Y & Y? Ka-h ba to? I don't think naman it's B & D, Both actresses are really good.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Y and Y. Dati pa issue na may backer yung isa. Saka “unnatural diction” napapansin ko na yan pag english hehe

    ReplyDelete

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...