Tuesday, October 9, 2018

Atty. Evalyn Ursua, Counsel of Cheryl Favila and Maricar Asprec, Releases Statement on Sexual Harassment Case Filed by Gretchen Fullido



47 comments:

  1. No one is stereotyping anyone. Naghahanap lang ng hustisya yung tao, wag nang mandamay ng community. Pinalalaki niyo lang yung issue.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is terrible! LGBTQ+ or not is not the case! This is whether there was sexual harassment or not! They lost the sympathy of the LGBTQ+ community because of that statement!

      Delete
    2. This is so low. Resorting to calling out the support of the sensitive community. And pag nagfile pala ng sexual harrasment, discrimination na agad? So kahit hinaharass ka na dahil sila ay nasa LGBTQ eh hindi na pwedeng sampahan?

      Delete
  2. Yeah right. An internal investigation of a case between execs and an employee that, for sure, was decided upon objectively.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Baket parang humihingi sila ng simpatya sa lgbt commununity?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kaya nga. Ginagawang discrimination issue. This was done in bad taste

      Delete
    2. Ganun na nga.

      Delete
  4. WOW USING THE LGBT CARD.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ikr! Pathetic move

      Delete
    2. And also the God card.

      Delete
    3. my thoughts exactly!
      They should put LGBTQ out of this issue. nkakahiya dinadamay pa LGBTQ!

      Delete
    4. itong network na ito kala mo mga hollier than thou ang panguuto ng mga tao.

      Delete
  5. Let the courts decide who between the warring parties is telling the truth.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Don’t make this accusation as an anti-LGBT . This is a case of sexual harassment. Stick to the issue. And, if the text messages used as evidence were taken out of context, then your client would not have been dismissed from work.


    Laban Gretchen!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If messages were taken out of context, may laban pa rin si Gretchen. It is the feeling of the victim that is examined here and not what the accused thought of the messages when it was sent. If Gretchen felt harrassed, yun ang basis why she took it up to the court

      Delete
    2. yes correct.Bakit itataya nung Gretchen ang reputasyon at career to spite the LGBT group? anong mapala niya di ba

      Delete
  7. we support and believe gretchen.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, we are behind Miss Gretchen! She's the vctim, wag ng magpaawa ang mga tunay na abusers!

      Delete
  8. Putting the LGBTQ+ card on the table because it’s convenient 🤦🏻‍♀️ Boo👎🏻 This is a sexual harassment case not homophobia . Diversion tactics

    ReplyDelete
  9. Discrimination??? Are you serious?
    Ginagamit nyo pa ang LGBTQ community para makahanap ng kakampi.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Magkaiba quantum of proof sa internal admin case at criminal case.. Inexhaust lang muna ni gretchen lahat ng possible remedies before going to court which is the right thing to do naman talaga. I don't like Gretchen but I'm with her.. I hope you can read this po. Tatatagan niyo po loob niyo

    ReplyDelete
  11. Ito ang totoong laban! Go Gretchen! Mas marami ang sumusuporta sayo!

    ReplyDelete
  12. There are always two sides of every story. Hope we can hear the full details from Ces and Marie next time.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Go Gretchen!Laban

    ReplyDelete
  14. Omggg! Maloloka ako kapag sinuportahan ng LGBT toh

    ReplyDelete
  15. Masakit sa brain ang mga toh.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Gretchen is actually risking a lot by filing these cases against powerful people. So I don’t see why this would be about LGBT. I don’t think Gretchen would go so far to risk her job, reputation if she wasn’t saying the truth.

    ReplyDelete
  17. It’s about time we took sexual harassment seriously. And pulling the LGBT card here won’t fly.

    ReplyDelete
  18. If it was baseless then why was Cheryl fired?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Booo.....sorry, not buying this. Wag kame Atty!

    ReplyDelete
  20. Hindi Basta Basta itataya ni Atty. Ursua Ang pangalan nya to represent those two if she didn't believed in them. Atty. Ursua has represented women who have been advised, raped in the past. She's a staunched advocate of women's rights. Look her up on Google and you will know what I'm saying.
    And tutuong magkaiba evidentiary standards SA administrative, civil at criminal. Pero kung SA admin pa Lang na substantial evidence Lang kailangan, wala na, pano pa SA criminal na beyond reasonable doubt. Anyways, it's good that this case will go to court. Dapat walang settlement or anything. Ilabas ang dapat ilabas and the court weighs the evidence.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are not the judiciary to determine that. An admin hearing is internal, the dismissal of which is not conclusive that a case is baseless. That an admin hearing dismisses a complaint does not mean there is no ground for a complaint whether civil or criminal. Brush up on your law subjects given that you try to sound as if you know them.

      Delete
    2. e what if sabihin din namin na hindi basta basta itataya ni Gretchen ang pangalan nya at trabaho nya para lang sa walang kwenta at gawa gawa lang ng kwento or mangtrip? Ano makukuha nya?

      Delete
    3. 1:59 simpatya. She's probably planning to leave ABS na Rin. Wait for it!

      Delete
  21. Sana ipakita ni Gretchen yung mga text messages para malaman ng lahat yung totoo.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hindi n nya pwede gawin un ngayon kasi nakasampa n sya ng kaso.. kung ipapakita man nya un sa korte na..

      Delete
  22. Playing the LGBTQ card? And you demand equality for all right? Be objective atty ursua. The case was filed not because of their sexual orientation, but because they allegedly used power and authority to harass and made the employee’s professional life miserable. Wag na kayo mandamay ng lgbt community. Duh.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Why is everyone concerned about the use of the LGBTQ community when on the first paragraph sinabi na nga na Gretchen used distorted evidence that's why it was dismissed the first time. People seem to be missing that part? Sorry but this whole #metoo movement doesn't fool me. It's been used and abused by women who are only out to get revenge. There's always two sides to the story. Before you jump wagon, analyze the situation fully.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Excuse me di mo yata alam haha.. Dismissed 'yung sexual harassment pero hindi 'yung gross misconduct kaya na-fire 'yung Favila.

      Kaya nga inangat niya sa court of justice 'yung sexual harassment. Di porket dismissed sa admin eh dismissed din sa court.

      Before you speak din, ANALYZE AND RESEARCH AH. Hahahaha

      Delete
    2. Next to the actual rapists and harassers, 1:23, people like you are the biggest problems in this. Your attitude and mindset needs a giant adjustment!

      Delete
  24. When there's smoke there's fire.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Hindi naman siguro magkakalakas ng loob magsampa ng kaso si fullido kung wala siya matibay na ebidensya, take note career ang nakataya, kaya naniniwala ako sa kanya, hindi xa celebrity need ng publicity for movie etc. Good luck and andito lang kame nakasuporta sayo Ms Fullido 😊

    ReplyDelete
  26. Kung baseless ang accusation, bkt nadismiss ang exec?

    ReplyDelete

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...