Ambient Masthead tags

Tuesday, March 14, 2023

Supreme Court 3rd Division Orders Dismissal of Rape and Acts of Lasciviousness Cases vs. Vhong Navarro

Image courtesy of Twitter: ABSCBNNews

 

73 comments:

  1. Good! I have always been team Vhong!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kung talaga kasing guilty si vhong tagal na sana siya tumakas pumunta ng ibang bansa. Kayang kaya niya yun gawin

      Delete
    2. Hahahaha San na un Team Deniece
      Labas dali!!! At least hinarap ni Vhong ang kaso niya. Hindi nagtago. Nagpakulong nung may warrant.

      Delete
    3. TRUTH PREVAILS! GOD IS GOOD ALL THE TIME!!!🙏

      Delete
    4. Dismissed hindi Acquitted. Know the difference beh

      Delete
  2. May iiyak na naman! Rhymes with rat.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah. She should have filed a case kesa mag ingay sa socmed.

      Delete
    2. Hahaha huy di ako natuwa sa balita pero natawa ko sa comment mo

      Delete
    3. Huwag na please. Kaumay na.

      Delete
  3. The truth prevailed .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 10:17 PM - A lot of things prevailed here but truth and justice were not among them

      Delete
    2. 1:34am, read the Decision. The SC clearly explained the reasons. Paiba-iba ang sinasabi na kwento ni girl.

      Delete
    3. 2:08, true. Mula pa nung una syang lumabas about Vhong raping her, iba-iba na kwento nya and some parts doesnt match with what cedric and chuwariwap boys' stories

      Delete
  4. really? ang lakas ng backer niya

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 10:23 Nakaka-tatlong administrasyon na 'tong kaso na 'to. Sa lahat ng admin na yun makapit ang backer? Wow sa lakas ah. Sheesh.

      Delete
    2. Backer agad? Di b pwede innocent talaga ung tao

      Delete
    3. Supreme Court na yan, backer pa rin?!? Ilang korte na pinagdaanan iisa decision, di mo ba naisip na wala talagang merit yung kaso?

      Delete
    4. Sinong backer ang makakaimpluwensya sa 5 supreme court magistrates?

      Delete
    5. Pinagsasabi mo diyan? Kita naman sa CCTV walang rape na nangyari doon sa Deniece na yan.

      Delete
    6. Backer sa supreme court? I doubt it

      Delete
    7. Backer ka pa rin ? Iba na nakaupo sa gobyerno ngayon . Iba na yung Chief Justice .

      Delete
    8. SINO ANG BACKER NYA?

      Delete
    9. Di ba pwedeng binasura nga dahil paiba iba un statement?!?

      Delete
    10. 10:23 read what the SC stated.

      Delete
    11. 11:44, ang rape na sinasabi ay hindi iyong time na nasa CCTV. A few days before nangyari.

      Delete
    12. Dati sabi si De Lima ang backer kaya najunk yung case. Ngayon na nakakulong na si De Lima, backer pa din? Grabe si De Lima, kaya niyang ipajunk ang case ni Vhong pero di niya kayang palabasin sarili niya sa kulungan.
      Not a fan of this guy but the illogical comments here are hilarious.

      Delete
    13. Backer?! e sha nga tong dinetain ng ilang buwan. Yung lawyer nga ni D na si T umatras na dahil alam na mahina ang kaso. Ang tawag dito 'Ipinaglaban ang totoo'

      Delete
    14. baks. Napakahirap bayaran ang supreme court.

      Delete
    15. If the decision was not influenced, somehow nakapag tataka pa rin, ang bilis mg decision ng SC, barely 2y ata since appeal was filed.. we all know andaming tumanda sa loob who are still waiting for their day in court. Kahit ata si Hubert Webb, antag al din sa loob before finally ma abswelto.. qhile si Vhong was even allowed to post bail.. so where is justice there?

      Delete
    16. 11:33 inexplain naman bat sya pinayagan magbail.

      Delete
    17. High profile case po siguro and napadali decision ng SC bec inconsistent and contradicting ang statements ni Deniece. But Ibang iba naman po eto sa case nila Hubert Webb.

      Delete
  5. Magpakabait ka na Vhong.

    ReplyDelete
  6. wow! Victory for Vhong.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Magaling abogado neto

    ReplyDelete
  8. Woahhh God is soooo good!!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Always been team Vhong, dami bugas ng side ni gurl

    ReplyDelete
  10. Effing goodness! Ano na nangyari sa hustisya??

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 12:18 read the news and what the decision of the Supreme Court.

      Delete
    2. Justice is not base on your own opinion mukang wala kang alam sa presentation of evidences pa lang sa lower court.napakahabang proseso nyan at may certain time submission. Hindi nakabase sa kung anong tingin mo ay guilty o hindi

      Delete
    3. kaloka ka! supreme court na po nagdesisyon.

      Delete
    4. Hustiya?! Itanong mo yan sa anak ng Justice Sec na hindi dumaan sa hustisya.

      Delete
    5. Maka react. Andon ka ba nung may ginawa siyang kababalaghan? Guilty until proven nga e. Hinde naprove kaya hinde guilty. Mabuti nga at hinarap nya.

      Delete
    6. Ayun, justice prevailed. Yun ang nangyare.

      Delete
  11. Diyos na bahala sau

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ikaw nga dyan nanghuhusga kahit walang evidence. Ikaw ang matakot sa diyos

      Delete
  12. Iba talaga pag may pera at backer. Ang bilis ng desisyon.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kung may backer sya hindi sya nakulong. Ibig sabihin ang lakas ng kalaban nya napakulong sya kahit hindi naman matibay ebidensya.

      Delete
    2. Luh ilang taon na nakalipas. Lampas dekada na ata,anong mabilis dyan?

      Delete
    3. How rich do you think Vhong is for you to think na kaya nya magbayad sa SC? Showtime na nga lang project nun. 😂

      Delete
  13. May magwawala na nman nyan

    ReplyDelete
  14. Tapos na. SC na yan eh.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. SC Third division pa lang. Pwede pa iappeal sa SC en banc, if I'm not mistaken.

      Delete
  15. Ok cleared na si Vhong. Sana magbago na siya para may good role model ang mga anak niya.

    ReplyDelete
  16. No surprise here. Alam na to as early as last year.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Replies
    1. Si Deniece? Reading her three different versions of the incident, ibang klase talaga yung ginawa nila kay vhong!

      Delete
  18. Para sa mga ka-FP na feeling justice didn’t prevail, glaring inconsistencies sa part ni Deniece. Magbasa din tayo ng facts para maliwanagan at mahimasmasan.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Korek 2:14 Kaso ang iba dito made up their minds na and not interested to find out the truth. So typical pinoy

      Delete
    2. No offense meant but telling Pinoys to read does not bode well with the majority.
      "Facts" and "magbasa" are words that do not exist in majority of the Pinoys' vocabulary.

      Delete
  19. This is SAD.At Least DC tried.I feel bad for all those other "victims"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kapag nagsasabi ka ng totoo hindi paiba iba ang statement mo dahil yun ang talagang nangyari. Kapag nagsisinungaling ka doon nagkakasanga sanga kasi hindi mo matandaan ang nasabi mong kasinungalingan nong una.

      Delete
  20. This has nothing to do wether may ginawa man si Vhong or wala. Sa korte kasi ang basis ng judgment is yung evidence na iprinisinta. Maraming inconsistencies and weak evidence, so talo ka.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Iiyak na naman ang kampo ni cedric Lee, from the beginning, hnd consistent ang statements ni Deniece against Vhong. Buti it got dismissed.

    ReplyDelete
  22. It's hard to lie. It will lead anyone to inconsistencies.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Expected. Weak ang case ni Deniece due to her camp's inconsistencies. Pati na rin yung napakagulo nyang statement. Kaya nga piring ang batas.. because courts are logical. It is based on how you present your case.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Pwedeng nakalusot sya dito, but as always, Karma is watching!

    ReplyDelete
  25. Hindi mo puedeng i convict ang tao ng wala kang evidence tapos yung statement mo pa paiba iba. Dapat nga hindi umurong itog kaso na ito eh dahil wala namang ebidensya. Pero lakas nila Cedric ah dahil kahit wala silang matibay na ebidensya at na pawalang sala na si Vhong nong una naipakulong pa rin nila kahit papano. May backer siguro sila Cedric para magawa yun. Kaso pagdating sa supreme court di nag prosper.

    ReplyDelete
  26. 7:27 all other victims po, yung isa dismissed din ang kaso then yung isa hindi nagkaso kaya nagpaparinig na lang sa socmed. at etong isa dismissed then so paano nga po sila mabibigyan ng hustisya kung sila ang statement nila ang problema

    ReplyDelete

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...