Ambient Masthead tags

Saturday, July 17, 2021

Kiko Pangilinan Files Cyber Libel Complaints Against Google Country Manager and YouTube Channels for Fake News on Him and Sharon Cuneta


 

Images and Video courtesy of Twitter: 

 

164 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. wow… reflect on your values baks
      dapat lang turuan ng leksyon mga nagpapakalat ng fake news. isa ka ba sa taga share?

      Delete
    2. Sana ol para matigil ang makakating dila na nagpapakalat ng fake news lalo sa entertainment industry.

      Delete
    3. Isa ka siguro sa mga nanonood at naniniwala sa mga channels na yan

      Delete
    4. 2:53 AM - or maybe the owner of the site, or ka-team or team lead ni troll

      Delete
    5. Good para madala mga yan. Daming fake news na utubers kailangan masuheto sila. Kaso maraming mahina na agad naniniwala sa nababasa. Kawawa ang biktima.

      Delete
  2. About time. Pugad ng fake news ang youtube. Miski papaano, may na ba-ban sa FB at Twitter.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True. Tapos nakaoff ang mga comment section nila. Pati yung may anak na daw si Alden at Maine, ikakasal na daw si KC at Piolo, dami pang iba grabe

      Delete
    2. 7.01 haha. Naloka ako dun sa magpapakasal si KC at Piolo! Yung AlDub forever delulu na mga yan!

      Delete
    3. There is such a thing as great YouTube channels. Documentaries, world news, free horror movies, Illuminati history, Bible studies and so much more.

      Delete
    4. Ano mas maramo, yung "great Youtube channels" o yung fake news channels?

      Besides, ang kaso eh bunga ng lack of inaction kahit na nireport na sa kanila yung fake newser.

      Delete
  3. Dami kasing fake news sa youtube. Off ang comments section. Dun mo malalaman na fake news. Dapat diyan talaga kasuhan. At un ibang kakulto kasuhan din kasi mga bunganga nakakasuka na

    ReplyDelete
  4. Nagdelete na yung uploader ng mga videos sa channel nya at nagpalit na rin ng name ng channel - World Peace na ang name.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gawa gawa kasi sila ng kwento. Daming shunga naman nanonood at naniniwala. Dapat lang yan. Sa newspaper nga pag gawa gawa libel agad

      Delete
    2. Too late! Public apology dapat!

      Yang mga fake news site na yan ang dapat pinupunan ng pansin ng NBI. Malapit na eleksyon, naglipana na naman sila!

      Delete
    3. 3:35 ayan na nga o Google PH mismo ang dapat managot dahil kahit ireport yung mga channel wala silang ginagawang aksyon

      Delete
  5. Nice move! Kalerky ang youtube, daming fake news at paniwalang paniwala naman yung lola ko huhu. I’m trying to educate her tho

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Omg ganito din yung mga thunders sa work ko. Imagine yung kwentuhan nila sa lunchroom is about Kris daw na nabuntis ni Kuya Will. And totoo daw kasi napanood daw sa YouTube. My gaddd. Lol!

      Delete
    2. Same with my mom nakakloka shnus sunod na ganung vids lang pinapanuod nya sa yt at least dito sa fp legit ang chika

      Delete
    3. 1:05 totally relate! Mama ko din naniniwala, ung mga senior kasi madalas di nila alam kung ano ung legit source sa youtube.

      Delete
    4. Jusko. Yung kaibigan ko din na nakapag tapos naman ng college at maganda ang trabaho paniwalang paniwala na nabuntis ni Vic si Julia. Pag ineexplain ko na fake news yun, may rebuttal na kesyo daw sa napanood nya inexplain na hindi kamukha nung isang anak ni Julia eh iba naman talaga tatay nun dahil may asawa si Julia dati.

      Delete
    5. Totoo! May kaibigan ako naniwala na naanakan ni bossing si julia clarete. May DNA test pa nga daw. Seryoso pa siya habang kuwento hayyy

      Delete
    6. True.. yung mother in law ko na nasa US paniwalang paniwala sa youtube na fake news. Yung kay julia montes lahat ng naka loveteam nya naging bf nya raw. Kaya ayaw nya si julia para kay coco kasi dami na raw naging bf. Sabi ko si coco nga ang 1st love nyan eh. Napanood nya raw sa youtube

      Delete
  6. Mabuti nga at masampolan ang mga yan!

    ReplyDelete
  7. grabe naman kasi ang fake news chismis talaga sa kanila.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hindi ko bet yang si Kiko, pero jusko, tama yang ginawa nya dahil punta kayo sa YT abay madami ng namatay na artista dun kahit buhay pa. Grabe mga YT Channels na yan. Takang taka ako eh paano na uupload.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Ang daming channel sa YouTube na nagkakalat ng fake news nakaka stress kahit na di mo fina follow parang pag open mo ng YouTube recommended agad! Kaya di na ako nag yo youtube

    ReplyDelete
  10. Wala sila maikaso sa kanya kaso clean talaga ang record nya kaya fake news ginagawa

    ReplyDelete
  11. Aaaahhhh. Aga mangampanya. Gumagawa ng ingay.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True! Sa Dami chika noon p but now Lang. KSP noted

      Delete
    2. Sya pa sinisi mo? Protektor ka ba mga fake news site na yan? I hope they trace you and sue you as well

      Delete
    3. Below the belt ang sabihin na sinasaktan at inaa-abuse niya ang asawa niya at may 3rd party daw. Ikaw ba papayag ka na lang?

      Delete
    4. Ayoko ng fake news pero parang gawa gawa lang yan para pagusapan at tumatak sa botohan.

      Delete
    5. So 12:56 pag may fake news na nakakapanira na tahimik na lang? E mga walang pinipili yung mga fakers kelan aatake. Isa ka kasing troll na spreader ng fake news kaya ganyan ang kuda mo

      Delete
  12. so not like him pero good move, dami mga video na click bait din

    ReplyDelete
  13. About time....

    ReplyDelete
  14. buti nga. go, kiko! that's why i rarely watch youtube. only if i want to listen to some music or look up songs.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Exagg naman kasi. Pero andami din kasing gullible na madaling maniwala sa fake news.

    ReplyDelete
  16. GOOD!!!
    Dati if you want to verify the validity the News go ka lang sa YouTube ngayon naglilipana na ang mga fake na pinagtagpitagpi from another source at inaalter pa at ang mga title/caption nila has nothing relatable sa content to be catchy sa viewers. It's about time they have to be responsible sa mga members nila!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Daming ganyan sa YT di lang about them, meron pa nga na si Bossing daw tatay ng anak ni Julia. Dapat talaga kasuhan na yang mga yan. Buti nga

    ReplyDelete
  18. Why file against Google? Are they the one who post fake news against Kiko? Google is a search engine and if gives people results on what they have searched for. The manager is not even liable for spreading fake news as it is Google which releases result. If you want to filter what can be seen online. Then its about time to step up the game and be a competent senator. Author a law about filtering the sites and content accessible in the country.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dahil nakita si Google sa bawat views, imagine your earnings is from spreading fake news

      Delete
    2. 1:22 nagbasa ka baks? me mga nireport na fake news, walang nirecognize ang google nareject lang most. so walang responsibilidad whatsoever itong mga social media platform ganern? kung terrorist content, pedophilia, etc. wala rin silang pananagutan? hindi na dapat maghintay ng batas para magkaroon ng social responsibility ang mga sites like google. kalurks ka

      Delete
    3. Te google kasi sila nag hahawak ng youtube pati payments ng youtube gets?

      Delete
    4. Google owns youtube. Kaloka ka

      Delete
    5. Attorney si Sen Kiko kaya alam nya kung sino dapat mga kasuhan good move ginawa nya.

      Delete
    6. 1:22 I agree with you.

      Delete
    7. Because they let it happen. Kahit ireport yung channel walang nangyayari.

      Delete
    8. You probably dont know how this YT thing works dear. Kawawa ka naman

      Delete
    9. The answer is in the article. He already reported the videos but Google did not find it to be defamatory even if they know that there is no factual basis for these videos. Youtube, as a form of media should be responsible for what is being shown in these channels. If broadsheets are being held accountable for what they publish, why make it different for Youtube?

      Delete
    10. True. Pero sa tingin ko dhl na siguro sa fact na hinayaan nila ma.post yang mga ganyan. Wala kasing verifier sa YT eh

      Delete
    11. Google is the owner of YouTube who allowed the fake news to still be up even after he reported it. So lawsuit is the next move, against both the Youtuber and the platform itself (YouTube - again the owner is Google).

      Delete
    12. Daming complaints pero walang aksyon ang google, period.

      Delete
    13. Basically, google owns yt and allows for the publication and distribution of the allegedly defamatory content in its platform. On that basis, it can be said that google can be held liable.
      A law filtering sites and content will not be possible because of the bill of rights which guarantee freedom of speech and expression.

      Delete
    14. Google ata may ari ng youtube.

      Delete
    15. Google owns Youtube and kahit ilang beses mo ireport yung mga fake news spreader sa Youtube, hindi nila binaban. Kaya dapat lang na idemanda din ang Google.

      Delete
    16. Si google ang may ari ng youtube. Parent company. Kapag may violation si yt, liable si google. Basically parang parent-child relationship. Kapag may kasalanan ang anak dapat kastiguhin din ang mga magulang.

      Delete
    17. 1:22 yung clueless ka pero andami mong opinion haha

      Delete
  19. You are a public official, your wife is an artist. Both of you nasa public eye. Hindi ka pa rin sanay? Hahaha. Galawang trapo. Kapag kayo bumanat ok lang, pero pag kayo binanatan para kayong bata na inagawan ng candy. Weak and pathetic move.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. so pede magpakalat ng fake news sa personal na buhay nila dahil public official and celebrity sila? kaw ang pathetic and ignorant.

      Delete
    2. The exercise to freedom of speech does not mean that one is free from the consequence therewith. Although both Kiko and Sharon have public persona, it does not mean, however, that their personal lives should be distracted by unscrupulous rumors made by the cgossipmongers. The public can criticize Kiko's leadership (since he is a public official)and/or even Sharon's artistry. BUT their private lives should not be invaded.


      I applaud the senator for filing a case. Hopefully, other people will follow suit. It's time to fight back against people who spread unverified information.

      Delete
    3. Isang troll pinaglalaban ang fake news youtube channel (& spreading of misleading news). Lmao. Palibahasa dyan kayo nag th-thrive.

      Delete
    4. I agree w Sen Kiko yang ginawa nya di lang para sa kanya dapat linisin ng you tube yong mga videos na ina upload andaming peke.
      Karamihang tao naniniwala.

      Delete
    5. Oo nga, it is election time, suddenly he is so concerned about this issue. Dapat umpisa pa lang

      Delete
    6. Huh? What kind of logic is this? Criticize the person for his work but don’t spread fake news about him or his family. Criticism is different from spreading fake / libelous news. Learn to differentiate one from the other 🙄

      Delete
    7. Ikaw ang pathetic sis. Bukod sa mga gasgas mong ad hominem nakakasuka yung reasoning mo. Try mo mag iodized salt

      Delete
    8. Seriously, that’s the kind of reasoning you have.

      Delete
    9. Okay lang sayo ang fake news 1:23 AM?

      Delete
    10. Iba ang sabihan na sinasaktan niya physically ang asawa niya versus kung nagsisigawan lang.

      Delete
    11. Bumabanat sila kasi may base sila.. Yan ang trabaho ng oposisyon.. kasama yan sa konstitusyon ;-)

      Delete
    12. Is their marriage for public consumption tho? Some of the banats you say are below the belt already. Weak and pathetic are those who spread lies and malicious content.

      Delete
    13. Wew! So pag paninirang puri, kahit fake new, tahimik na lang? Kaya madaming troll kasi may mga taong tulad mo 1:23 na ganyan ang paniniwala. Dahil lang ba public figures sila wala na silang karapatang ipaglaban yung totoo? Tao rin silang nasasaktan at napupuno

      Delete
    14. Oh really? Ano ung kinalat nyang fake news sa idol mong mas trapo? Weak and pathetic mga kagaya mo na nahanapan pa ng excuse ang mga source of fake news. Nag eenjoy ka ba manuod ng ganun kasi pabor sa opinyon mo?🙄

      Delete
    15. It's a publicity dear dahil malapit na ang filing of candicacy and sooner campaign na. It's a strategy.

      Delete
    16. Galit na galit ang mga comment. Magaling lang sumagot dito kasi mga keyboard warrior. Daming alipores ni Mr.Cuneta. 1:03 tama ka baks, publicity kasi malapit na campaign season. Natatabunan na si Mr.Cuneta ng ibang balita e.

      Delete
    17. 3:09, isa ka rin sa gumagawa ng fake news eh. Di mo nga kilala yung mga nandito and yet you have the gall to label them as “alipores ni Mr. Cuneta”.

      Isa ka din sa mga colorblind na tao na yellow & red lang ang alam.

      Delete
  20. Nice move! Panahon na para linisin ang yt!

    ReplyDelete
  21. Finally someone is brave enough to take legal action against these fake spreading youtube channels. 👏

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why only now, is it because it is the start of the campaign season.

      Delete
    2. i wouldn't question the timing. anytime is a good time to stop fake news.

      Delete
  22. Maybe it’s about time na magkaroon ng special court dedicated to cases like these. Yung mga spreaders ng fake news. Di na kailangan umabot ng taon-taon to resolve the case since Lahat naman ng evidence eh available online. Instead na jail time, mas better kung magimpose ng malaking fine perhaps 10x kung magkano ang kinita nung tao from spreading fake news and year(s) of community service.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Thank you Sen. Kiko. It's high time that these fake news spreader gets penalized for their actions.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Waste of time.. Bobo lang naniniwala sa mga ganyan jusko..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Madaming naniniwala FYI. Masyado kang blinded ng fanaticism sa poon mo nakalimutan mo na ang tama at mali

      Delete
    2. Kaya lang marami sila.

      Delete
    3. Marami ang naniniwala diyan kasi.

      Delete
    4. 1:56 You should be locked up with the spreaders of fake news

      Delete
  25. Madi dismiss ang case against sa Google Country Manager. YouTube, a Google-owned platform is not privy to the commission of the act. Yung mismong may ari lng ng channel and nag upload ang dapat makasuhan. The identity of the owner of the said YouTube channel must be ascertained and it is only the case against the owner of the said YouTube channel ang mag stand in court. Parang dapat, alam ng nagsampa ng case yun kase lawyer sya. Or keri ong na ma dismiss basta mag create ng ingay?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ingay ang habol dyan & not to win the case.

      Delete
    2. may responsibility sila ano ba. nireport n nga ni kiko diba so why dont they check it? yung sex videos nga nachecheck nila at tinatanggal nila so bkit ang fake news hndi? lalo n kung nireport n mismo ng taong sinisiraan. diba nga si zuckerberg ilang beses pinapatawag sa US court pag may something sa fb at laging sinasabi sa kanya na bakit wala syang gnagawa.

      Delete
    3. 1:58 keri lang madismiss to prove a point. it's a call to action. putting the country manager on the spotlight para mahiya din naman ang youtube/google at magset up ng mechanisms para mabawasan ang mga videos na nagpapababa ng intellect ng mga pinoy.

      Delete
    4. They should be held liable. Afraid ka ba baka masapawan ng ingay partido nyo?

      Delete
    5. Hindi magfa file ng walang basehan at kung alam na di pwedeng kasuhan, wag kang mas marunong sa lawyer

      Delete
    6. The publishing platform is liable halerrr

      di mo ba alam pag may libel case kasama ang publication company?

      sus!

      Delete
    7. 1.58 "YouTube, a Google-owned platform is not privy to the commission of the act".- the minute after somebody reported it they become privy to it. So yes they do.

      Delete
  26. Ganyan! Don’t give these you tubers Warnings, kasuhan agad agad ng Hindi makapagtago, delete or change name haha

    ReplyDelete
  27. Sana nga may masampulan sa mga nagpapakalat ng fake news. Lol, kabahan ba kayo.

    ReplyDelete
  28. It is not the duty of Google to ascertain and rule on whether or not the videos posted by the owner of the YouTube channel is defamatory or not. YouTube is a social media platform and it just gives the content creator an avenue to put in their content. In other words, YouTube amplifies and fortifies the freedom of speech tgat Kiko Pangilinan and his colleagues are standing for. I just think that it is a grave error to implicate YouTube in this case. To censor and manipulate the social media platform is a monopoly of the freedom of speech. Shoot straight the uploader of the video content and not YouTube because YouTube is not made for that sole uploader alone. Election na kase.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lam mo naman galawan nila, double-standard hypocrisy is their forte 💁‍♀️💁‍♀️

      Delete
    2. yes it is. kiko clearly stated that he reported the said videos but still google rejected nor did something. yes it is just a platform but yet they still have responsibilities. it's like nude/sex videos, are you allowed to upload it on youtube? they have time to remove or banned those videos so why don't they double check the defamatory ones if it is reported.

      Delete
    3. Exactly. It's an uninformed move - unless he's doing it for the publicity? Ugh

      Delete
    4. 2:08 paulit ulit ang comment! takot ka sa media mileage ni kiko no?! lol

      Delete
    5. Paulit ulit ka jan sa hirit mo halata namang ikaw din yan. Election election. Kaya nga kayo pakalat ng pakalat ng fake news kasi election na. Mas gusto mo pa kumalat fake news rather than do something about it?

      Delete
    6. I'm sure prior to filing the case against Google/Youtube, all avenues have been explored such as reporting to Google/Youtube these questionable channels. It seems the action taken by Google/Youtube is not satisfactory.

      Delete
    7. Please read RA 10175 to avoid having an ignorant opinion

      Delete
    8. 2:08 iba po ang freedom of speech s fake news. Itaga mo yan s utak mo

      Delete
    9. Attoreny po si kiko at senator sya, tingin niyo di nya alam ginagawa nya?

      Delete
    10. "It is not the duty of Google to ascertain and rule on whether or not the videos posted by the owner of the YouTube channel is defamatory or not". - YOUTUBE PUT "REPORT" BOTTON SO THEY WOULD KNOW WHAT'S HAPPENING BUT INSTEAD OF ACTING ON IT THEY DID NOT DO ANYTHING. THAT'S THE REASON WHY KIKO FILED A CASE ASKING THE COURT TO DEMAND YOUTUBE TO DO ITS JOB. YOUR EXCUSE IS NONSENSE.

      Delete
  29. Tama yan. Sumosobra na ang mga yan.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Side ako sa Youtube channel kasi free speech. Kung ayaw nila mapagusapan umalis silang magasawa sa showbiz at politics.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Free speech ang magkalat ng fake news? Iba din pag iisip mo no? Malapit na election,alam mo naman daming uto uto..mga 16M

      Delete
    2. mag aral ka muna ineng at mukha wala kang alam about free speech 235! pag sinabing free speech may boundary pa rin yon! di ka pwedeng manira ng kapwa mo just because you are free to do so, pwede ka talagang kasuhan!

      Delete
    3. Shunga fake news nga e.

      Delete
    4. 2:35 iba ang free speech at responsible journalism/reporting kesa sa slander at libel. Ang paninirang puri ay hindi sakop ng free speech clause

      Delete
    5. Free speech doesn’t give you the right to make up false stories about a person, kaya nga may laws pertaining to slander and libel. Free speech doesn’t mean a person can be irresponsible. Gamitin sa tama ang right to “free speech”.

      Delete
    6. Hala kinuyog ka na ni 7:38 AKA 7:44, 7:48, 7:56 & 7:59 G na G siya sau ðŸĪŠðŸĪŠ

      Delete
    7. Kanina pa nga yan sa free speech reason nya, pano sila yung nagpapakalat ng fake news. Shushunga shunga

      Delete
    8. What kind of reasoning is this???

      Delete
    9. 7:56 i am sooooo with you, girl. Super agree with u.

      Delete
  31. Diyan lang sila kumikita sa fake news. Marami namang mahina ang utak na naniniwala.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Finally. Serves these channels right. OA 'yung fake news and clickbaits nila for the views when really you can't even call it content anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Ang daming fake news sa youtube.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Good! Yung iba kasi sumosobra na mga below na belt na tirada.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Full support Sen Kiko. Stop fake news!

    ReplyDelete
  36. About time. Let's do this for our next generation

    ReplyDelete
  37. di ado magtataka kung ka-culto yang mga nagkakalat ng ganyan

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True. Andito nga din sa FP comment ng comment

      Delete
  38. Sana this leads to info on these troll farms being publicized and trolls being named in public!

    ReplyDelete
  39. Grabe talaga mga Youtube vids ngayon. Meron pa nga namatay daw yung artista!

    I can't blame Sen. Kiko for filing a case, pinalabas syang adulterer and domestic abuser. Sobrang below the belt.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Dami ngang ganyan tapos ang chaka ng voice over parang kung saan lang kinuha hahaha

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Marami din sa news entertainment gumagawa ng ganyan lalo at mga sikat ang tao sinisiraan. Karamihan bayaran din para manira at ayaw nila sa isang tao. May nagbabayad at nagpapabayad.

      Delete
    2. Edited ung audio para umiba ung boses, Ung iba gumagamit ng Text to Speech na app.

      Delete
  41. Bakit kasi tinotolerate ng YouTube. Kaya Ang daming fake news channel na pinag perahan

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Google PH ang humahawak ng mga yan kaya ayan kasama sa demanda

      Delete
    2. Tinotolerate nila kasi may cut sila sa kita ng ads, eh milyon ang views ng fake news

      Delete
  42. Go! Very good move. Hope you win the case.

    ReplyDelete
  43. His wife is always having nervous breakdowns on tv or social media and the chismosas automatically assume it’s kiko’s fault.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 6:12 still not an excuse to say na binubugbog nya misis nya lalo kung wala naman ebidensya

      Delete
    2. Meron bang ganoon on TV and social media? Wala naman. Wag naman ganyan.

      Delete
    3. May tama ka baks! Hahaha... Madrama sa socmed eh anu pa ineexpect nila? Kakaloka

      Delete
    4. 6:12 well for most people here think that the reason why the wife is always having nervous breakdowns is because of HERSELF. Narcissist naman kasi si wife. Kung hndi puro sarili and her luho ang pinopost nya, puro throwback naman tungkol sa mga exes nya ang pinopost nya. Haiz

      Delete
  44. Ang nagiging trend kase lately is the term allegedly or di-umano na walang confirmation ng story na narrative but the thing nakapagkwento ka na..yun ang nakakainis..

    ReplyDelete
  45. Ibalik niyo kasi ang "The Buzz" taob lahat ng fake news channel na yan, jusko yung mama ko kinwentohan akong buntis na daw si charice hahahah. Bakit ba kasi nawala ang the buzz??

    ReplyDelete
  46. Nice move, lakas kasi ng mga loob ng mga yan, kumikita ng pang-iimbento ng kwento.. Tama rin kasama ang Google Philippines para maaksyunan nila mga kumakalat na fake news. Sana si Vice Ganda nagsampa rin ng kaso, di kc titigil mga yan kung puro parinig ka lang.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Go go sen Kiko!, tama lang yan, youre a public figure and libelous fake news like that lalo na election na, baka may political sabotage from the DDS grp na hnd nag iisip at na brain wash na ng kasinungalingan ng admin na to

    ReplyDelete
  48. Hayyy salamat sa pag sampa ng kaso! Grabe ang fake news everywhere on the internet. Netizens specially the teenagers and thunders are gullible. Ang daming clickbait. Hanggang title or thumbnail lang ang tinitignan.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Kung youtube marami fake news pano pa ang facebook.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kaya di na ako gumagamit ng Facebook. Kakasuka ang mga kumakalat na fake news. Dati masipag ako mag refute pag may nabasa akong fake news pero grabe sa dami ng kumakalat nakakapagod na din.

      Nakakalungkot lang na kaya marami ang kumakalat na fake news ay dahil marami ang gullible na Pinoy. At kaya gullible kasi ill-educated. This clearly shows how bad the education standard is in the country :(

      Delete
  50. Sila rin yan nagpakalat gagastusan para makasuhan pero pagnanalo sa botoha 5x ang bawi lokohin niyo lelang niyo mga trapo ang mga politiko sa pinas.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dati hindi ako naniniwala na may eng eng. Ngayon naniniwala nako

      Delete
    2. Wag ka kasi tumingin sa salamin 2:01 para di ka mahurt.

      Delete
  51. Nakalimutan niya yung Maharlika on Facebook and YouTube. Yun ang number 1 na tumitira sa asawa niya!

    ReplyDelete
  52. So Vic Sotto dapat magdemanda rin jusko para matagal ang mga hayop na yan.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Hay naku. Napakaraming troll farms sa pinas, for hire. They can and will do anything so long as you can pay them. It’s really bad.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Fake news and propaganda are just starting. Elections are coming soon, and you will see more and all kinds of them on Facebook and YouTube and other social media.

    ReplyDelete
  55. actually, in favor ako na dapat lahat ng youtube channels na i-banned lahat na nonsense ang content at pinagkakakitaan lng ang pangpplastic at pagpapalaganap ng fake news. sus, pinapayaman nyo mga so called influencers na yan pero walang kwenta ang mga videos, pagmmura at kplastikan lng pinapakita

    ReplyDelete
  56. The sad thing about chismis and fake news channels is that the content creators are getting paid by youtube. Lowest of the low. Parang binabayaran ang mga magnanakaw na magnakaw.

    ReplyDelete

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...