Sunday, April 14, 2019

Tweet Scoop: Zsa Zsa Padilla Forgives Person Who Used Her Name to Marry, Had to File Second Annulment








Images courtesy of Twitter: zsazsapadilla

51 comments:

  1. Oh wow kaloka naman yan!!! Only in the pilipins!!! Kahit sino pala sa atin pwedeng mabiktima ng ganito. Oh my!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why the need to file an annulment when you can prove na hindi ikaw yung tao na kinasal? Di ba pwedeng kasuhan yung kumuha ng identity mo ng identity theft at maging null & void yung kasal?

      Delete
    2. Nakakadiri na sa pilipinas sa totoo lang ang hirap na mabuhay dito.

      Delete
    3. dapat icheck yung judge bakit me pirma nya yung marriage contract

      Delete
    4. 10:34 1992 daw nangyari yun

      Delete
    5. 7:38 judicial intervention/action is required to declare marriages as null and void. It is the only remedy. Even if, in this case, the marriage is void ab initio, kailangan parin ng court declaration. The identity theft is a ground for such decalaration- under the Civil Code this is a non-consensual marriage. Walang consent both parties, therefore void ab initio since consent is an essential requirement for contracting marriage. :)

      -law student sana maging lawyer. Hahaha

      Delete
  2. Proof na papel lang ang kasal. Napepeke din pala. Nakakatakot na ang panahon ngayon bakit ang dali gumanap na ibang tao. Kailangan na ng chip sa lahat ng valid id.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Magkaiba ang wedding sa marriage. Wedding is easy buy staying in a marriage is hard work

      Delete
    2. During that yr married pa siya sa first husband niya. Eh di null and void lang ito dapat. Grabe naman ang pinagdaanan ni zsa zsa. Parang someones trying to nake things complicated so she cant get a proper marriage.

      Delete
    3. 7:36 ang layo ng logic mo. ang usapan dito is pamemeke ng marriage contract. hindi yung pagsasama as a married couple.

      Delete
    4. Even if the marriage is null and void you still have to prove that to court. Malaking pera din kaylangan ilabas para don.

      Delete
  3. papel lang pala talaga ang kasal

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ay grabe,kaloka naman yan 😦

    ReplyDelete
  5. Zsa Zsa really deserves happiness.She is so nice even to ordinary people!Happy for her

    ReplyDelete
  6. Grabe naman. Kung hindi pala kumuha ng cenomar di nya malalaman na kasal sya uli. Kakaloka sa Pinas

    ReplyDelete
  7. the marriage certificate was invalid/executed illegally to begin with pero need pa rin niya ng legal proceedings to annul???? nakakaloka naman! dapat sa paper shredder na ang bagsak ng marriage cert na yun! pag ginawan ng annulment, both parties just confirmed that the "wedding" did happen! nakakainis naman mga tao sa city hall na yan!!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi. In law, only the court can declare a marriage null and void or have it annulled. Kaya kahit fake marriage pa yun or hindi nangyari, kailangan talaga pumunta sa court. Iba po ang null and void kasi meaning nun hindi talaga valid yung kasal simula pa lang, it is as if walang marriage. Pag annulment, valid until annulled. Pag kasi walang court intervention edi lahat ng tao pwede mag self declaration na hindi sila kasal. So in a bigger picture mas detrimental sya sa society. Kaya need ng court intervention talaga.

      Delete
    2. 12:44 the mere fact na wala sila pareho sa bansa pero naikasal sila dito e null and void na ang kasal. Kilalang personalidad naman si Zsa Zsa di ba kayang iverify ng korte yan na iba pirma nya sa marriage contract? so ikinasap nila?
      talong-talo naman ung nabiktima, sira records nya gumastos pa sya.

      Delete
    3. 12:44 as you pointed out, null and void is different from annulment. Pero bakit annulment ang finile ni zsa zsa and not null & void kase biktima lang naman sya ng identity theft? Kahit di nga sya yung kinasal, by filing an annulment she's basically admitting that a wedding between her & this guy DID occur and she wants it annulled.

      Delete
    4. Hi. Im 12:44. Annulment is also the term sa process. But when you file it ang prayer mo eh to declare it null and void. Yung isa naman annulment but the prayer is to have the marriage annulled. Kaya nakalagay na she filed for annulment kasi un din ang term sa process or remedy. You see kahit kilalang personalidad si zha zha hindi basta basta igrant kaagad yun. You have to consider na hindi lang naman sya ang nagpapa annul. So pag nag file ka hindi naman ora orada yun grant, may hearing pa yun to prove it. Again the law does not look into the personality but the evidences presented.

      Delete
  8. Why go to thrubthe process of annulment kung hindi nman talaga kayo kinasal at nagsama at hindi magkakilala?! Hassle naman! Dapat kung nagpakita ng proof na hindi sila yun, just consider it null and void. Sana may legislator na i-review ang batas sa kasal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 12:13 yan din naisip ko! why justify an illegal act/process? mukang pinerahan siya, tsk tsk tsk. sindikato yan, inside job...nakuuuuu talaga!!!

      Delete
    2. Panong nakasal kung ni walang marriage license at di naman signature nya nas certificate

      Delete
    3. kaya nga kailangan i null and void so that she can legally marry itong fiance niya.

      Delete
    4. I stand corrected. I read na null and void means may process ng annulment. Sa pagkakaintindi ko ha.. nakakalito lang ung kaso kasi married pa siya sa first husband niya tapos kinasal siya ng 1992?! Ang labo ..

      Delete
    5. To all the NON LAWYERS, you still need to file a PETITION FOR DECLARATION OF NULLITY (not annulment) in order to officially say that the fake marriage is indeed null and void.

      Delete
    6. 1:25 ah ok thank you! Dapat talaga may divorce na dito sa pinas para mas madali intindihin hehe

      Delete
  9. Kawawa naman si Zsazsa gumastos sa kasal na hindi nangyari. Mahal kaya ng annulment

    ReplyDelete
  10. pano nangyari yun na di nman sya talaga kinasal & sinong ang nag officiate para malaman talaga & di ba matagal din na annul kasal nya sa 1st husband bat nakasal sya nung bago pa lng sila ni dolohy?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. falsification of public documents.Pwedeng inimbento yung isa pang kasal at may nagpanggap.

      Delete
    2. Yung judge na pumirma sa marriage license dapat ma question. Paano siya nag execute ng isang legal document na hindi present ang mga involve.

      Delete
  11. Diba dapat null and void na ito sa una palang? Grabe ang bulok ng ganitong sistema.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Katakot! Kahit sino pwedeng pwede makaranas nito. Makakuha lang sila ng personal information pwede ng gamitin sa mali katulad nito. Mga mumsh careful din tayo sa pagpo-post sa social media ng mga personal information natin. Huwag masyadong kampante na hindi ka pwedeng mabiktima. Always prioritize digital safety and privacy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. true, kasi pwedeng nagpanggap yan na si Zsa Zsa ginamit ang personal info niya.

      Delete
    2. katakot naman.. pano nalang kung yun tao eh walang pera.. tsk3

      Delete
    3. Kaya dapat hindi ilagay ang buong name with mothers maiden name sa social media , bday at place. Ang daming ganyan ung passport pino post sa fb or ig! Ewan ba! Hindi alam ang identity theft.

      Delete
  13. eh papano kung may mga scammers at kasabwat... at marami sa pinas ang ginamit ang pangalan at ikinasal kuno... eh di lahat tayo mapapagastos sa bagay na di naman natin kasalanan?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Poor Zsa Zsa. Is that scam?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Tanong ko Lang: if you are annulled, do you call the other partner ex? Di ba null and void ang kasal, so hindi mo siya ex. Only if you got divorced, then he is your ex. And your kids become illegitimates. Enlighten me, please.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. While annulment effectively means the marriage never occurred, it does not retroactively affect a child's legitimacy status. At the time of the child's birth, they were born of a legal marriage under civil law. This means the child was born legitimate and this status will not change when the marriage is annulled.

      Delete
    2. hi 1:21. the kids do not lose their legitimacy kahit madeclare na null and void ang kasal ng parents.

      Delete
  16. Bka yong x husband nya may kinalaman para hindi sya (zsazsa) makasal uli.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Di ba she already cleared him? I don't think he would go that low lalu na he found his own new love himself.

      Delete
  17. Walang ganyan sa States, na-alala ko tuloy kasabihan na yan. Pwede pala yan no, kaloka and what about the Japanese guy? Cleared na kaya name niya?

    ReplyDelete
  18. Kaya today ingat tlga sa pag popost ng personal information online lalo na sa socmed. Kya ako wlang nka lagay sa mga socmed ko kahit name anonymous. Charot. ahahaa

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. kahit anong ingat mo pag nagkamali na govt sa paghandle ng sensitive info wala din, juat like what happened with DFA. At ganun ganun na lang un, kahit national security na ang at stake, wala namang ginawang drastic na action ang govt natin to protect our identities

      Delete
  19. Lagi na lang nagkaka aberya sa issue ng pagpapa kasal ni miss zsazsa.

    ReplyDelete
  20. so kaya siguro nauso ang cenomar. nakakaloka ang mga people of the phils

    ReplyDelete
  21. di kaya iyan din ang dahilan bakit di natuloy kasal nila ni dolphy noon?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. hello. yung fake merriage 1990s. nadiscover nya lang nung magpapakasal siya sa current bf nya after dolphy. common sense will tell you na nalaman na sana nya yan nung buhay pa si dolphy kung papunta na sana sila sa kasalan.

      Delete
  22. The letter of the law is meaningless in the Philippines. There's a reason the truly virtuous don't become lawyers there. Ethics and justice have no place in the Philippine legal system.

    ReplyDelete

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...