Smart Ads

Wednesday, November 30, 2016

FB Scoop: Arlyn dela Cruz Did Not Give Any Pemission to Baron Geisler



Images courtesy of Facebook: Dela Cruz Arlyn

34 comments:

  1. love the sarcasm at the end hahaha! true enough!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hala may Susan Enriquez incident pa! And the plot thickens...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Binugahan daw ni baron ng usok ng yosi si Susan Enriquez sa mukha

      Delete
    2. 5:45 true bakz at makangiting demonyo pa after

      Delete
  3. There is no doubt that Baron did wrong. The question is, why didn't the director or the other watchers stop the filming? They are as guilty as Baron is. You can tell from Arlyn's interview. She was shaking. Why? Because she knows she did not do anything while she could have. Even those people who were there, anybody could have stopped it from happening. It's not only one man's fault.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pilitin pa rin na ipagtangol si Baron? Kaya lumalala eh. Wow just wow.

      Delete
    2. Ilang beses nang inexplain, walang monitor, wala sila sa loob nung trailer ng truck kung saan shinushoot yung eksena, ang nandon lang, camera crew at yung mga actors hindi nila nakikita yung mga nangyayari sa end nila.

      Delete
    3. Exactly my point. Other watchers cannot be blame. Its the directors shot to call "CUT" pero hindi ginawa ni arlyn.. ika nga keep the ball rolling...
      Also baron, you do not pee on co-actors!Tama si ping binaboy mo sya.!
      In any scenes like that, they use water not real pee. Hay naku!!!!

      Delete
    4. Teh ala ngang monitor.. at closed door ata ung room. Ang scene lng nmn n kkunan eh mukha ni ping at paa ni baron

      Delete
    5. Yan din naiisip ko. Walang nag cut. Yung iba ngang tao sa eksensa ano sabi ni ping? Parang naluge lang ...natulala?

      Delete
    6. Nagbasa ka? Walang monitor sa scene na yun kz impossible at nsa loob ng container. Maka kuda k lang d mo nmn binasa.

      Delete
    7. 2:09 di ka nagbasa.l kaya di mo masagot ang tanong mo.

      Delete
    8. Hindi daw makita kasi madilim tas walang monitor. Ang cue lang is the dialogue. Nung narinig yun sampal, nag cut na. Akala daw nung direktor yun yung pinagpaalam ni baron na gagawin niya kay ping.

      Delete
    9. proofread please.. for the nth time..WALA NGANG MONITOR, mahirap bang intindihin yun?

      Delete
    10. walang monitor sa scene --- gets ko yan. kaninong kasalanan na walang monitor? it's still the director who should be in control of things. eh kung sinaksak ng isang actor ang co-actor nya? pwedeng gawing excuse pa din "e walang montor sa scene" ?? The director should ALWAYS be in control and on top of the situation. at fault din si direk dito.

      Delete
    11. kung ang direktor, wala sa loob ng container, diba sa monitor xa nakatingin.. yes, monitor sa labas (dpat naman talagang walang monitor sa loob ng container dahil ang monitor nasa labas at dun titingin ang direktor- Diyos ko ang tanga ng mga rason nyo na "Walang Monitor Sa loob"). Ung ginagawa ba ung eksena-- anu gawa ng direktor? Dinidikit ang tenga sa pinto ng container at nakikinig kung anu nangyayari sa loob? Kaya pala narinig nya ung sampal.. lol... di ko kinakampihan c baron dahil maling mali talaga xa pero ung direktor na kambyo, haizz naku direk.. akuin mo rin na may pagkukulang ka...

      Delete
    12. Anak ng tokwa! To twist the reality just to fit your narrative, 10:50am & 11:38am, how low you people could get? Shinishift nyo yung sisi sa direktor pero dun sa taong nambaboy? Wow pare!

      Delete
    13. Hoy 4:15, c 11:38 to.. basahin mo ung buong sinabi ko para malaman mong di ko kinakampihan c baron..

      Delete
    14. At saka Indie movie, low budget. Waste of film kung puro cut. Kaya nga mga professional and serious actors ang nandyan. Walang pa-diva.

      Delete
  4. And you will be remembered as the director who cannot take the blame #hugaskamay

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Delete the scene na inihian c ping. After what she said Kay baron. If ako c baron, ippdelete KO. Ndi pwd gmitin sa final ang scene na un sa movie. Baka gmitin pa un para marming mnood.

      Delete
    2. Tinanggal si baron sa movie, bakit pa nila gagamitin yung scene?

      Delete
    3. 0853 wow just wow..parang kamping kampi kay baron ah

      Delete
  5. Sorry pero as head ng production may accountability siya sa nangyari. Huwag hugas kamay. If basag/lasing si Baron dapat hindi na niya pinagtrabaho pa.

    At really? Profit pa din iniisip after ng nangyari? May sinehan pa bang papayag magpalabas ng film na ganyan naging kalakaran? It won't be about the film anymore. It will always be the movie where "inihian ni Baron si Ping Medina".

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hah! So pati si Susan Eniquez? Na hindi taga showbiz? Who you are Baron is already exposed, so kung artista ka or producer or director and you accepted a project with him and got hirt on the way..... ikaw na ang na-warningan at may kasalanan don?

    ReplyDelete
  7. How cheap is this production not to have a monitor always?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. exactly. baron is the worst. pero natatangahan ako sa excuse ng production at ni direk na "walang monitor sa loob"

      Delete
    2. 8:31 true as a director you have the last say... parang nagchange ang statement ni Direk...

      Delete
    3. Iyan po iyung mga indie films na gustong gusto nilang mapanood sa mmff kasi may substance at d basura

      Delete
    4. 11:11 haha o nga

      Delete
  8. Baron doesn't need anybody to ruin his reputation? He did it to himself.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. baron will not be baron if he protects his reputation

      Delete
  9. Just basing from all the stories that I have read about him, Baron is an alcoholic and he needs to be rehabilitated.

    ReplyDelete

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...