Thursday, March 14, 2019

Insta Scoop: Nicko Falcis Belies Press Statement of Kris Aquino's Camp on Taguig Prosecutor's Decision, Reveals List of Dismissed Cases


Images courtesy of Instagram: nix722


Images courtesy of Instagram: jesusfalcis

53 comments:

  1. Ang yayaman na ng mga abugado for both parties hinde pa Christmas ah! Hahahah

    ReplyDelete
  2. Pati ba naman ung halagang 4.6k? Hahaha. Naku kris, mukhang may madidismiss na case nnman. Hahaha

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 11:12 napansin ko rin yun. 4.6k pag-aksayahan ng milyong milyong ibinayad sa lawyers nya? Ang tindi!

      Delete
  3. and G is insulting the judges and the justice system by implying they are easily manipulated.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not insulting dear. Just factual. The Taguig case is a clear example if you read the whole case.

      Delete
  4. Iba po yung qualified theft sa estafa... dismiss nga po yung qualified theft pero estafa po my probable cause...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. May charge ba ng estafa na finile? Di ba qualified theft lang?

      Delete
    2. Nag file din ng estafa case si kris

      Delete
    3. Walang estafa case so the defendants right was violated bcos they were not given the chance to respond to the accusation they only answered for the qualified theft complaint

      Delete
    4. 10:14 basahin mo muna ang post ni Falcis bago ang hanash.

      Delete
    5. 4:12 true. They were deprived of due process. Qualified theft lang ang charge na na-dismissed. Bakit biglang nagkaron ng charge ng estafa and cc fraud? Hindi nabigyan ng chance ang Falcis camp na sagutin ang mga allegations na yan.

      Delete
  5. Juiceko hindi pa ba tapos ang dalawang to? kaloka na ha ang mga ganap.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. madali lang naman ang solution dyan. eh di hwag mong basahin! pa-simple ka pa. interesado ka nmn. lol. aminin!!!

      Delete
  6. Nasaan ang actual na sulat ng court stating na dismiss ang case?

    ReplyDelete
  7. you win some, you loose some. different courts have different appreciation of evidences. Dismissed in some courts, with probable cause in Taguig. Face the music, Falcis brothers. If you think you have a strong case, face Kris Aquino in court. If you hink nadaan sa palakasan, then prove Kris Aquino wrong in court. Nung na dismiss ang sa ibang cases, kayo ang maingay, tahimik lang si Kris. Ngayon na may probable cause in Kris' favor, kayo parin ang maingay. Kris accepted the decision of the courts where her cases where dismissed. why can't you also accept the decision of the Taguig court?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 11:58 anong tahimik si kris e may presscon at live video pa nga! Lels

      Delete
    2. Teks may sinabi ba silang they will not face Kris in court? *side eye*

      Sa tingin mo kung hindi dismissed yun, tahimik si Kris?? Tumahimik lang naman sya kasi talo na. Dismissed na.

      Delete
  8. I saw the post of Kris with the statement from the Law Firm. I think totoo yung kasi the law firm will not issue wrong decision of the court or else makakasuhan ang office nila ang tanggal lisensya ng mga abugado. And they have accepted yung mga dismissed cases so i guess totoo na may kaso sa Taguig

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Read the statement. May mga loopholes

      Delete
    2. Gusto ng mga tao makita yung court resolution, hindi yung statements lang from both camps.

      Delete
  9. Ano ba tlaga ? Ano to fake news ang taguig ?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Accdg kay Kris, Estafa. This is Qualified Theft. Magkaiba yun di ba?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 12:11 ngayon naman estafa. Akala ko ba qualified theft? Nililito ang mga chismoso't chismosa lol.

      Delete
  11. 11:58 pero hindi ni-mention dun na dismissed ang qualified theft complaint ni kris. diretso agad sa estafa at ra 8484.

    ReplyDelete
  12. estafa ang credit card fraud daw
    yung na dismissed e qualified theft

    kahit ako nagugulahan hahaha wait na kang ako sa mga comments bukas

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Aside from qualified theft, may complaint din ba ng estafa at violation of RA 8484? Kasi ang nasa news lang e 44 counts of qualified theft. Bakit biglang nagkaron ng complaint ng estafa at violation of RA 8484?

      Delete
    2. Dismissed yung sinampa ni Kris na qualified theft.

      Pero mismong yung korte ng Taguig ang nagsasabi na base sa mga ebidensya meron silang nakita na basehan para kasuhan si Falcis ng estafa/violation of RA 8484.

      Delete
  13. Dismissed ang qualified theft pero may probable cause ang estafa? Hong Golo. Mga classmate na lawyer pakiexplain po para sa aming mga mangmang sa bata.

    ReplyDelete
  14. San Juan P4000+. Ano ba naman yan Kris? Sana ikinain mo nalang yan. Magbabayad ka ng milyones para sa 4k?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ikr pag nagkaron ng probable cause yung theft sa san juan, 4000 pesos lang ang pag aawayan nila doon nkklk!

      Delete
    2. A 4k is a 4k. Di napupulot un

      Delete
    3. hi it is not about the amount. what matter most is yung criminal liability which can kead to imprisonment if found guilty beyond reasonable doubt

      Delete
    4. More than, imagine yung waste of court time na gamit na dapat para sa other more important cases.

      Delete
    5. It’s not the amount but the principle behind it

      Delete
    6. yep..4K is 4K, she also paid millions to get back 4K. If this complaint makes sense, i don’t know what to make of you...

      Delete
    7. 4k would mean something if nicko demamnded to pay and refused to pay it but if nicko wasnt even asked to explain and accused right away of fraudulent use of card and not even demanded payment just sued roght away in court, that is susupicious.

      Delete
  15. Medyo nakakaloko yung magbabayad ng milyones para magsampa ng kaso sa san juan rtc para maghabol ng 4000 pesos hahahaha

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It looks like Kris just wants to prove that there is a valid case. . . . the expensive way.

      Delete
    2. Sometimes the amount doesn't matter. It's the principle.

      Delete
    3. korek k po 11:10am

      Delete
    4. SHE'S ASKING FOR MILLIONS IN RETURN, THOUGH.

      MANINIWALA AKONG PRINSIPYO ANG PINAGLALABAN NIYA KUNG "1 PESO" ANG HINIHINGI NIYANG KAPALIT.

      PARANG IYONG KAY TAYLOR SWIFT. MAY SINAMPAHAN SIYANG MANYAKIS NA PRODUCER PERO 1 USD LANG HININGI NIYANG KAPALIT.

      Delete
  16. I think Kris will lose in this case but she will soar beautifully high after. Arte ko hahaha

    ReplyDelete
  17. Qualified theft was dismissed in Taguig. But prosecutors recommended that Kris' team file estafa and cc fraud against Nicko instead.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Natawa din ako sa 4k plus. Pero ang saya siguro kapag yun ang hindi na dismiss.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Taguig City dismissed the Qualified Theft charge, but found probable cause for Estafa. Ang issue ng magkapatid - nasa Complaint ba ni Kris Aquino ang Estafa?

    Ang press release ni Kris Aquino months before ay multiple Qualified Theft charges ang finile nila. Mukhang nakatunog sila na isiningit nina Kris Aquino ang estafa charge sa ilang courts (Taguig City in particular) na hindi man lang nalalaman ni Nicko. If that was the case, it violated Nicko's right to defend himself from the estafa charge, his right to due process.

    Since Taguig City did not furnish the Falcis brothers a copy of Kris Aquino's complaint, they filed a Motion to Inhibit against the Taguig City Prosec.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Just to help out sa mga medyo nacoconfuse. Sa appreciation ng Taguig City Prosecutors, walang qualified theft kaya dismissed ang kaso. However, ang nakikita nilang dapat i-file ay Estafa at Violation of RA 8484. Only the prosecutors can determine probable cause in filing criminal complaints because this is stil in their jurisdiction. They wi be the ones to represent as public complainant representing the People of the Philippines. Kris, on the other hand, will be the private complainant.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not all criminal cases are filed sa prosecutors office. It depends on the penalty imposed.

      Delete
    2. Not all criminal complaints are filed sa prosecutor's office not because of the prescribed penalty, but whether or not yung venue ng alleged commission of crime ay city ba. Kung city, always sa prosecutor's office. If not, pwedeng sa police station or direct sa court. Criminal cases are always filed in court. Now, this is where the prescribed penalty will come in kung sa RTC or MTC ba siya mafa-file.

      Delete
  21. comedy ang 4k san san juan. llol

    ReplyDelete
  22. I still believe Nicko.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Ang prosecutor ay may kapangyarihang alamin kung ano ang tamang krimen na probably na-commit ng taong inirereklamo mo base sa facts na in-alleged mo sa complaint. Kaya, for example, kahit sabihin mo sa complaint mo na qualified theft ang reklamo mo but your facts do not constitute the elements of qualified theft, rather estafa, e estafa ang ire-recommend ng prosecutor na isampang kaso laban sa'yo. Complainants cannot control what criminal cases will be eventually filed in court. If you were not satisfied sa appreciation ng prosecutor, pwede mo naman i-apela yung resolution.

    ReplyDelete

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...