Ganyan sa Quezon City. Ang mga batas no to planking, pwede mag half rice, sisingilin ka sa pagtapon ng basura sa basurero at ngayon ito. Nakakatawa. Sana tubuan sila ng puso at ut@k
I agree with you Anon 12:12, if someone says they advocate for animals, it applies to every kind of animals. Hindi selective lang, but can you expect from Heart.
But youre not heart, so nganga! For once I agree with heart, pet lovers will be forced to abandon their pets bcoz of this which is also illegal. Sana yung number ng anak ang kinucontrol dhil maraming wla namang pampakain ng mga anak, anak nang anak tapos pag lumalaki na, pakalatkalat lang sa kalsada. Buti pa stray dogs/cats, at least ndi nanghoholdup or nananaksak, yung mga batang lansangan? Pag lumaki at nagkalakasloob, sila nagiging pasaway sa lansangan
Tama 12:45, 11:16 sa QC daming professional squatter mayayaman pa sa middle class kasi may paupahan. Hindi totoong mahihirap. Mga walang kwentang bagay ang finofocusan gaya nito. Parang inaadvocate nila ang pet abandonment
So much time to react?? Well thats how people who are not busy.. But im wondering shes a little bit Star Fruit! Shes concern about animals yet she has hermes alligator and other leather bags that use animals skin??? What an ironic girl
Heart is a hypocrite. She's all talk but cannot do the walk. She should look at Paul McCartney and his family. He advocates against animal cruelty so he raised his family to follow a vegan lifestyle. His daughter Stella McCartney who's a famous designer doesn't use leather in her work ever.
hahaha ekat winner nanaman ang comment mo hahaha.. "Not to mention but i will mention maybe she thinks crocodile is not animal cause they are family" got me hahaha
Lahat na lang binibigyan nyo ng masamang kahulugan! Kahit anong magandang gawin o sabihin nung tao, pag iisipan nyo pa rin ng masama. Nakakaawa mga taong ganyan pananaw sa buhay. Punong puno kayo ng hatred.
Hindi naman kasi lahat naalagaan ng mabuti. Even here in the US there are pet hoarders. Kaya they have the law as well na people cannot have too many pets...
Nanood din ako ng animal Hoarders, sobra nga dun, pati pusa na patay na nilalagay pa sa ref nung maay ari,kasi hndi nila kayang itapon ang napamahal na sa knla.. Pero dito sa atin, korek m ako pag may nabalitaan ka, pero wala pa akong nabasa or napanood na balita.. Sa atin kasi pag may alaga ng ganyan, mentalidad, magbantay ng bhay para sa magnanakaw.. Pero dagdag pakain sa knla ang mga alagang hayop. eh karamihan dito, mahirap ang pinoy.
kaya nagkakaroon ng pet hoarders dahil din sa mga ibang mga taong iresponsable! Hinahayaan magpalaboy laboy yung pets nila tapos pag ginalis pababayaan lalo, kaya ang gagawin ng may malasakit na tao kukunin at aalagaan. E kaso ang hirap magpa spay/neuter dahil mahal! Bwisit na ordinance yan!
I agree with you 12:19. it will be unfair for those taking good care of their pets. ako im not from qc but upon hearing and reading this ordinance, its a big stupidity. mas madaming problema ang qc rather than the pets. i myself have dogs and even adopted a cat with her kittens and had neuter/spay and vaccined them as well. pano yung mga responsible owners like me? it will be very unfair. dapat siguro yung mga owners ng pets na mahuhuling palaboy laboy lang ang hulihin not all. nasa loob lang naman ng bahay anong problema dun?
Let's face it maraming iresponsableng pet owners, not to mention yung mga hoarders (I think me mental disorder sila). Ang problema kasi, pati ibang tao napeperwisyo, tulad ng maingay, di nabibigyan ng anti rabies dahil di kaya ng bulsa, tapos pag nakakagat ng ibang tao, walang maitulong. Kahit saan na lang eebak yung alaga nila, etc. OA lang si Heart na ia abandon daw yung pets ng owners dahil sa ordinance na yan. Pwedeng more than 4 pero hihingi ng permiso.
Hindi naman classy pero parang habang binabasa ko parang feeling ko si heart ang nagsasalita. Bipolar lang. Haha! Pero wala naman masama sa sinabi niya. I agree with her. Natural na sa atin ang mag ampon ng mga aso at pusa. Dapat bigyan din ng contraceptives ang mga alagang hayop kasi wala naman silang family planning. Bwahahaha...
Pwede naman magtagalog. Nsa Pinas naman tayo...heart, it's the lawmaker imposed the penalties and its the people who are being penalized for the imposed penalties....omg!
Tama naman grammar nya. It is the lawmaker who passed the law. The imposition of the fines are directed on the people (direct object). Hence people are imposed of penalties with regards to pet ownership. Stop being nega ang see the issue. Sana yung nagpasa ng law na yan mag volunteer sa Animal.Welfare orgs. Kasi wala syang karapatan manghusga if he doesn't know the situation. Saka sana inuna ang ordinance sa Free Kapon kaysa sa ganito.
May mga pet owners na kung ano dami nila sa loob ng bhay, ganon din bilang ng alaga nila pets.. Parang pamilya din talaga. Wala nabang maisip na batas, at pati mga pets eh pinagbabalakan ng pakialaman
Uuuuyyyy..nagpapaka relevant. Hahaha! Buti na lang nahanap mo yan sa dyaryo noh. Wala na kasi ibang news na pwede ka magreact eh. May say ka lang sa mga doggy doggy and cats cats. Hahaha! Wala ka naman kasi talagang advocacy eh. Dog and cat lover ka lang.
12:35 shunga! Ang ibigsabihin na dog and cat lover LANG siya eh hanggang dun lang naman ginagawa niya, yung mag alaga ng sarili nyang mga pets. Wala naman siyang advocacy. Bakit di siya magpatayo ng mga animal shelter kung talagang nagke care siya. Trying hard to stay relevant kasi yang hibang na yan. No actions to back up her words.
Nag-advice pa sya na dapat quality food lang ipapakain sa mga dogs eh paano naman kung hindi mayaman ang pet owner? Paano kung kanin at ulam lang ang kayang ipakain? Dapat mag advice din sya ng mga alternative na pagkain na hindi mahal at hindi pang classy and elegant na katulad nya lol
2:25 tignan mo nga, she's with PAWS? Sinong may alam? May event ba siya o naging speaker for PAWS lately? Eh ang tagal na nung picture niya kasama aso o pusa niya noh. Hindi porket nagpose siya in a poster for PAWS eh advocacy na nya yun. Alam lang nila na dog and cat lover siya kaya nila kinuha. Pero wala siya talagang ginagwang work for PAWS.
As an animal lover, I'm totally against this. We take in strays, provide shelter and food. Maraming paraan to control animal population. May spay and neuter dapat na pinatutupad sa bawat city or better yet, magpagawa ng humane animal shelters. There are a lot of ways to consider, wag naman puro money-making opportunities ang palaging nasa isip nyo. Nakakabwiset!
i agree with 12:45. i myself is an animal lover. if u really care for your pet you will find a way. bkt ililimit yung pets ng responsible owners? pano ang mga breeder? meaning pag nanganak ng madami ang pet automatic need na mapenalize? nonsense na ordinance!
What's up with the City council? Puro non-sense ang mga ordinancies. Nakaka-insulto sa mga pet owners. Pagka-abalahan nyo kaya immediate welfare ng constituents nyo!
What a stupid ordinance! Why not the city gov't provides Free anti-rabies shots for stray dogs and cats!Hindi yung pati animal lovers ay gusto pa ninyo kunan ng taxes!
As long as i keep my pets in my private property and take care of them, I do not think anyone has any right to tell me how many I can have.Are these councilors for real? Next thing they might propose is the number of people who can stay in a house...
Kung PAWS si Heart, dapat hindi na rin siya gumagamit ng mga animal-derived products, tulad ng leather bags & shoes, tulad ni Natalie Portman. Regardless, kung yung ordinance eh for house pets lang, kung talagang PAWS siya at advocate siya for all animals, dapat itigil na niya ang paggamit ng mga animal-derived fashionista niya.
I assume that the main reason for this ordinance is due to animal bites which has been disregarded. If you think that this ordinance is the solution then you will be disappointed as this is just about 20% solution to the real problem. I am pertaining to those street dogs and cats - why don't you try to rescue them instead of looking into those sheltered animals? Or is it about the extra income they can get?
I have 65 pets. I am no breeder. We could barely make ends meet trying to provide for them, but we do, working our butts in order to do so. They are all vaccinated, fed regularly. This ordinance would entail my family to come up with at least 33k because we exceeded the 4 pets per household cap.
I've seen a local documentary where a woman's dog was confiscated by the city (I forget which). The dog was fine living with her, and she obviously loved her pet. However, she was deemed unfit to take care of the dog because she had low income. At the pound, she couldn't claim the dog back because they were asking for a high fee. She visited the dog every day to bring her food, noting that the formerly cheerful dog had become depressed in the pound. I never got to the end, I don't know if the woman got her dog back. This was several years ago but the story bothers me to this day. I think this law might eventually have similar effects for households with more than 4 dogs or cats. They'll confiscate pets, make money off them by charging owners, and pets who can't be claimed will suffer. Then, more dogs and cats in poorly maintained pounds are going to be euthanized. Better to have free spaying and neutering programs than this law. I'm all for registration and health care, but this law is just going to allow authorities to abuse their power to make money.
i wonder if this was written by heart, she doesn't use ' in most of her IG posts and the way she constructs her caption is way far from the usual. just saying :)
Paano kapag nanganak ang dog ng 4-6? You need to wean them asap pala para maipamigay mo na. Kawawa naman mga babies. Paano kung walang mabuting tao na kukupkop sa mga furbabies? Nakakakonsensya naman kung makikita mong dadami lalo ang mga aso sa paligid dahil ayaw sumobra sa apat ang alaga. Parang hindi yata ito ang angkop na solusyon. Hindi pinag-isipan mabuti ang ordinansang ito, imho
Sana bago nyo pakialaman ang mga alaga ng may alaga ayusin nyo muna ang problema dito sa qc anu gagawin nyo sa ibang sobrang aso ipapakuha nyo at dadalhin sa dog pound eh wala na nga kaung mapaglagyan ang dapat nyong gawin yung mga stray dogs ang kunin nyo at bigyan ng pansin di yung mga aso na inaalagaan ng maayos grabe naman kau
Malaking responsibilidad rin kasi ang pag alaga ng mga animals, kaya dapat talaga, mag alaga lang ng tamang number ng animals sa bahay.
Sa kabilang banda, marami rin kasi talagang mga stray dogs & cats na nangangailangan ng bakuna at tamang pag alaga sa kalusugan. Eh, wala naman programa ang lokal na gobyerno para alagaan ang mga aso't pusang walang guardians.
Usually, yung mga ganyang ordinansa pinapatupad para ma-pressure ang mga tao pumili kung magbabayad ng multa o i-give up ang pets. So, sa puntong yun di rin ako sang ayon.
I am for this ordinance. May health issue din kasi na involved e. Kahit gaano pa kalinis yan, still it can bring disease. Isa pa, kung madami kang alaga may chances na meron kang hindi masyado maaalagaan. Isipin mo na parang maraming anak, merong isa o dalawa na magsa suffer. Agawan siempre ng food. Well, ibang usapan na kung ultra rich ang nag aalaga. As for Heart, kailan kaya siya matututong gumamit ng single period at mag construct ng sentence. Palibhasa high school drop out at ang english natutunan lang by hearing it from other people.
Bakit sa tingin mo maaalaggan ba yan sa impounding center... Tingin mo gagastos ang Q.C para maalagaan, mapakain o ma-vaccine yang mga animals... Pera pera lang yan.... Bakit hindi yung mga stray animals ang bigyan nila ng pansin imbes yung mga nag-aalaga at nagmamahal sa mg alaga nilang pets....
I agree with you Reeya. Mucha Cha, hindi lahat ng may pets animal lovers, although they think that way. Tulad nung iba, ikukulong lang or ikakadena lang yung aso, tapos yung malaya nga di naman pinapakain, tapos dudumi kung saan saan.
This is what you get when you elect meatheads in public office. How does this ridiculous and utterly stupid ordinance help "control" rabies and other so-called zoonotic diseases? I, for example, have more than 4 dogs and all are vaccinated (anti-rabbies, boosters, etc) and well-taken care of. My dogs never leave the house, and when they need to have their exercise, I have a big enough garage where they can run freely without disturbing my neighbors. I'm a responsible pet owner so why should I be harassed by this stupid ordinance (if ever it gets signed)? Bakit hindi niyo paigtingin yung kampanya nyo sa pagcontrol ng stray dogs and cats through free/mandatory vaccination of pets, information campaign, pagfine sa owners ng pets na pagala-gala sa kalye, etc. Bakit pati yung mga responsableng owners dapat madamay dito? Why do I need to register as a breeder ganung hindi naman ako nagbebenta ng aso? Madami lang talaga yung aso ko. Ang nakakatawa, pag nagbayad ka, pwede ka din naman magalaga ng higit sa 4 na aso/pusa. Ano ngayon ang sense ng pagbawal in the first place? Your guess is as good as mine. At isa pa, hindi lang basta hayop ang turing ko sa mga aso ko, pamilya sila para sa akin and I'm sure a lot of pet owners can relate to that. Kaya ano gagawin nila, kukunin yung sobra sa 4 kong aso na parang laruan lang? The level of ignorance in this ordinance is disturbing.
I have the same exact sentiments. Walang sense para sakin to. Pinupuntirya nila ang mga pet owners, unfair to sa mga responsableng nagaalaga ng hayop. In my case, may intances na pinupulot ko mga pusa sa kalye para alagaan and we have an enclosure at the back of our house. Never silang lumabas, gumala or namerwisyo. Gumagawa nanaman ng pagkakaperahan ang mga ampaw na yan.
May kulang pa nga ang ordinance ng Mayor, dapat ipakapon ang mga pets para hindi dumami ang aso at Pusa sa PI. At isa pa kailangan sa loob ng bahay nakatira ang mga pets hindi sa labas na nakakadena, ang papayat pa nila, hindi yata pinapakain.
Nice one heart! How is equating "being responsible" to "maximum of 4" in any way NOT absurd? That is a lazy metric. Something as nebulous a term as "responsible pet owner" requires better rubrics. Tutal binabayaran na din ang City Vet PER PET, due diligence na lang na mag ocular inspection at assess ng mabuti kung kaya nga suportahan ang pets. Putting an arbitrary number is just plain lazy.
Wala naman sa dami, ang pag trato sa kanila ang mahalaga, maski iisa ang aso mo pero turing naman ay burglar alarm na naka tali sa gate buong araw at gabi.
Good thing i dont live in QC. Or else riot ito. Bat hindi mga taong anak ng anak tapus di naman kayang magpakain ang prublemahin dyan? Bat kailangang mga animal lovers ang sagasaan? Mas dapat nga magpasalamat kasi me mga tao pang nagmamalasakit sa mga hayup. Paano kung nagpapakain ka lang ng mga stray cats gaya ng ginagawa ko sa garahe ko?Paano na pala kung 4 lang ang ang pets ko tapus nanganak? Ano gagawin pag di madispose agad? Pag di mabenta?meron na ba sila plano kung ano gagawin? I got dogs and cats and turtles as well. Pati turtles ipaparehistro ko din? Mag isip isip din kung minsan
Parang malabo. Sinasabi ng iba idispose or ipamigay yun babies pag nanganak yun aso. Eh pano kung tntreat namin yun doggies namin as part of the family? Hindi po kami namimigay ng family members. Wala bang kumontra sa paggawa nyang ordinance na yan?
Before you make this stupid ordinanace built a real animal shelter house first wherein stray animals will be well taken care of. This animals deserves also care and attention.
I don't think there's a problem with keeping heaps of pets in your house. Just make sure that you can provide the proper needs of your pets just like the needs of your family. Eg. vaccinations, vet fee, their food, etc. do it if you can! But if you can't, then shut up! Priority your family first before everything else. Be responsible!
How about regulating the living conditions unto which the dogs are subjected to? Kung lower than four nga ang aso mo pero di mo pinapakain ng maayos or hinahayaan mo lang magkasakit/lumala ang sakit, eh di useless din.
so if cspable ka to care for as many as you can, bawal na at need to register? pano yun nag aampon ng stray cats n dogs, huhulihin na ri sila? hay naku... inncome generating yan kc mahal yun mga imported breed dogs n cats na nasa haus lang. kaya va ma-control ng tao ang magiging anak ng dogs n cats? so ano gagawin pag.marami anak, itapon sa basurahan kc penalize ka at di ka sunod sa batas? tsk tsk tsk
How about regulating the living conditions unto which the dogs are subjected to? Kung lower than four nga ang aso mo pero di mo pinapakain ng maayos or hinahayaan mo lang magkasakit/lumala ang sakit, eh di useless din.
Anong gagawin kong mabuntis ang alagang aso at pusa abortion bakit hindi kayo mag open ng animal clinic na mag sterilize sa mga aso at pusa para hindi nagkalat moning kong saan saan at tuta. Hindi ba mas effective yon? kailangan nga lang ng pondo ng city hall. Tapos strict monotoring sa may alagang aso at pusa.
This is another form of corruption na naman.. hays.. why not magkaroon sila ng issued license for breeders and stop those illegal breeders instead yung tirahin nila mga pet owners eh kung naaalagaan naman.. mga pulpol talaga mga nakaupo sa gobyerno, mapa local man o National..
Umiral na naman si buwaya, hanap hanap ng pondo pag may time. Eh paano yan ang dami ko ampon na pusa, nanganak pa nga yung dalawa, magbabayad ako ng tax? di naman ako breeder, pinapakain ko lang yung mga naliligaw, grabe naman yan!
this is bullshit!! as long as you can feed your pets ..take care of them.. and be responsible pet owner ..who will tell you to limit your pets.. it is not them who spends for their food! damn ordinance! I'll transfer to a different city instead!
the way I see it, bottomline ng ordinance na ito is all about Money! ngayon pati pag aalaga ng hayop na lagpas pa sa gusto mo eh pakikialam nila? lahat na lang pagkakaperahan
dapat ipdesexed nlng ang mga aso at pusa like sa ibng bnsa den dpt mga responsableng tao lng ang ng aalaga kya nga dumdmi ung mga stray kase ng aalaga mga iresponsable mg.aalga tpos hhyaan sa lbs den mbbuntis ddmi dba? my god d mrunong mg isip ng ibbtas kung gusto nia umonti ipakapon .. euthanasia? hindi sgot yn sa ibng binsa nga pinptnggl n ung naggaganyan dahil bakit m tatanggalan ng buhay yan? dyos kb? wala silang kasalanan bakit dumadami sila!! my god bakit kase hinahalal yang mga artista !
No way....yan sakin ano pakialam nyo sa mga alaga ko love na love ko ang mga ito kumpleto ang vaccine shot nila lahat at mahal pa ng pagkain nila mas mahal pa sa bigas na kinakain namin...at hindi nakakalat sa kalsada ang mga alaga ..ko nsa loob lng sila ng bahay namin at sosyal ang kanilang tambayan sa sofa lng naman ...gusto lang kumita ni mayor herbert kasi malapit na ang election nag hahanap sya ng panostos...kaya un ang naisip nyang pag kuhanan ng budget kasi alam nya maraming pet lovers sa QC....
No! How about yung mga animal lovers na nag-aampon ng mga pinabayaang pets sa kalye? Gusto lang naman nilang makatulong ah.. Mali talaga ito.. Tinatanggalan niyo ng pagkakataon ang mga kawawang pets na ito na magkaroon ng owner na magmamalasakit at magmamahal sa kanila.
Gawa kayo ng gawa ng ordinansa, hindi nyo nga magawa yung trabaho nyo na hulihin yung mga asong gala sa kalye! Hahanap nanaman kayo ng mapapagperahan, pag pinirmahan mo yan Bistek ibig sabihin hindi ka nag iisip, Hulihin nyo lahat ang pusang gala at asong gala, yan ang asikasuhin nyo!
ang naintindindihan ko lng dto pera ang habol n nmn nila.. sows.. 200 pesos registration??? libre ba bakuna?????malamang hinde!!! pati mga aso pagkakakitaan n rin ninyong mga pulitiko. grabe. kwawa ung mga breeders. tsk tsk.. PCCI please help us into protest..
Capture stray dogs, cats, and other animals that are wandering around public places without any leash or lingering around the streets without its owner. This ordinance is useless without proper implementation of other congruent animal ordinances.
Lahat nalang gusto nyong i- regulate. Imbes na ganahan yung ibang tao na mag adopt ng pets baka tamarin na sila dahil lahat nalang may bayad. Buti sana kung yung perang makukuha nila gagamitin para makapagpatayo ng animal shelter house.
No more good officials in Q.C. Why limit the numbers of rats, mice, robbers or buglars, the squatters and of course the government officials who are doing nothing good and just receiving the taxes of the taxpayers money as their stravagant livings.
depende po siguro sa kakayahang mag alaga ng hayop ang dami ng aalagaan. minsan po kasi, dumadami lang ang alaga dahil nire-rescue o napupulot lang sa kalye at binibigyan ng maayos na bahay ang hayop, hindi naman po dahil sa binili yung hayop o sadyang pinarami. magiging kawawa naman po ang ang hayop sa kalye kung hindi na sila ire-rescue ng dahil lang sa na max out na nila yung pwede nilang alagaan.
allocate funds to have pets rescued from irresponsible pet owners - The city councilors have the funds - They have a pork barel fund which they can use for this instead of buying cars and votes from illegal settlers in their barangays.
they dont want to chase after stray cats and dogs since di sila kikita jan so go after households that give them shelter, multa sa mga residente noh? panalo ka bistek! LOL
Marami rin kaming aso dumami sila dahil inampon ko imbes na katayin ng kapitbahay namin.. at iyong mga pusa namin iyong mga nakakalat dito samin at pinapakain namin hanggang dito na sila tumira napamahal na sila samin...pano na lang kaya.....wag naman po kayong ganyan...iba na lang po pagkaperahan nyo PLEASE!!!!!
government then must be homes for the extra cats that they will "arrest" and then "detain". pour in huge budgets for their food, medications, vaccinations, etc.... Di ata nagiisip ang mga quezon city councilors!
Bat may limit?? And why does it always have to involve special permits with fees?? wala na bang ibang paraan?? this is just another money-making scheme...and what's next nito? QC will limit how many kids you can have?? IMO, the dog pound needs to do their job and be more efficient kung meron man prublema sa animal bites.
I don't think this is how we teach people to be resposible pet owners. What do you do now if you have more than four but you treat them well? And were did they get the magic number? Breeding however is a different story. What does it say about animal shelter for abandoned and abused animals? Or if I just want to save animals and keep them in my property?
What the?!? Calling mayor bautista!! Ano to?! Nananahimik mga aso ko, masayang naglalaro sa garden tapos papakielaman niyo?! Atupagin niyo un nga aso/pusa sa kalye at hindi un "domesticated". My god!
sana lang mas pag aralan ang mga batas, instead na i-limit ang pag mamay-ari ng pets, dapat ipaigting ang kampanya sa spay and neutering ng animals lalo na sa stray animals. sa halip na magkurakot, ayusin ang mga shelter para sa mga alagang hayop na inabandona or naligaw at nawawala. makakabuti rin na ipa register or magka-lisensya ang mga pet owners para sa pag aalaga ng pets kung ang gusto lang nman ay makasiguro na maalagaan ito and mabibigyan ng maayos na pangangalaga. paghusayi ng ng lokal na gobyerno ang kampanya sa mga bagay na mahalaga tulad ng population explosion, poverty alleviation dahil kapag ito ay natugunan, mas magiging maayos ang lahat at mas madaling masolusyunan ang iba pang mga bagay gaya ng problema sa pag aalaga sa mga hayop.- Dhonna
Eh papano naman yung mga excess na hayop diyan sa Quezon City Hall? Dapat ipatupad itong ordinansa na to sa mga nag-aalaga ng mga hayop na fixers, ghost employees at iba pang mga alagang hayop ng mga corrupt sa City Hall.
Ang hindi nila maintindihan is the fact that there are many families who view their pets as part of their family. Hindi mo naman pwedeng ipamigay o palayasin, o ipaampon ang isang miyembro ng pamilya mo kung alam mo naman na kaya mong alagaan! I have 4 adult dogs, 1 Puppy, 5 adult Cats and 5 kittens... hindi ko kyang itapon o ipamigay ang mga anak ng mga alaga ko, 5 of these "pets" are actually rescue cases. I have 2 jobs so I can support them, and give them what they need. Does it make me a bad citizen of Quezon City to be taking care of so many in my home? NO!... No one in the government can dictate how I exercise my humanity and compassion towards my family, pets included! This effin Ordinance is preposterous! Ayusin nila ang crime rate sa QC at magpasalamat sila na may mga tao na responsableng nagaalaga ng mga animals within the city! The more responsible pet owners, the less strays... Ilang beses nang sinave ng mga alaga ko ang mga anak ko from akyat bahays even giving up their lives just to save my children, samantalang ang QC Government walang nagawa!
7% ang cases ng HIV sa QC. That's very alarming. Ano kaya kung proper education, awareness programs, at damage control kaya ang pagtuunan ng pansin ng mga politiko sa QC bago ang ganitong ordinance na obvious naman na money-making scheme nanaman. #hays #kawawangpilipinas
Kamusta naman ang crocodile skin na bag mo? Atsaka if I were you heart mag put up ako ng animal shelter d ba rich ka?
ReplyDeleteConnection ng crocodile skin bag sa issue na to?
DeleteBakit? Pet ba yung crocodile? Man's bff ba yung mga ahas mo?
Delete12.18 Aren't crocodiles animals too?
Delete12.20 Are cute pets the only animals we should protect and care about?
makapag bash lang eh no 12:18? bakit pet ba ang crocs?
DeletePet lover po sya...
DeleteGanyan sa Quezon City. Ang mga batas no to planking, pwede mag half rice, sisingilin ka sa pagtapon ng basura sa basurero at ngayon ito. Nakakatawa. Sana tubuan sila ng puso at ut@k
DeleteLove ur comment 12:45!!! Korek na korek!!
DeleteUnless you found a way to domesticate crocs I suggest you shut the hole in your face. Lol
DeleteI agree with you Anon 12:12, if someone says they advocate for animals, it applies to every kind of animals. Hindi selective lang, but can you expect from Heart.
DeleteBut youre not heart, so nganga! For once I agree with heart, pet lovers will be forced to abandon their pets bcoz of this which is also illegal. Sana yung number ng anak ang kinucontrol dhil maraming wla namang pampakain ng mga anak, anak nang anak tapos pag lumalaki na, pakalatkalat lang sa kalsada. Buti pa stray dogs/cats, at least ndi nanghoholdup or nananaksak, yung mga batang lansangan? Pag lumaki at nagkalakasloob, sila nagiging pasaway sa lansangan
DeleteTama 12:45, 11:16 sa QC daming professional squatter mayayaman pa sa middle class kasi may paupahan. Hindi totoong mahihirap. Mga walang kwentang bagay ang finofocusan gaya nito. Parang inaadvocate nila ang pet abandonment
DeleteSo much time to react?? Well thats how people who are not busy.. But im wondering shes a little bit Star Fruit! Shes concern about animals yet she has hermes alligator and other leather bags that use animals skin??? What an ironic girl
ReplyDeleteApparently, her understanding of being an animal lover is limited to the level of dogs and cats...
DeleteHeart is a hypocrite. She's all talk but cannot do the walk. She should look at Paul McCartney and his family. He advocates against animal cruelty so he raised his family to follow a vegan lifestyle. His daughter Stella McCartney who's a famous designer doesn't use leather in her work ever.
DeleteYes cause her mind is also limited. Not to mention but i will mention maybe she thinks crocodile is not animal cause they are family
DeleteI love your last statement ekat. Very true.
DeleteHAHAHAHA nakakaloka ka Ekat
DeleteTumpak ekat. And she married one!
Delete12:53 Girl, the ordinance only covers dogs and cats.
Delete- Lawyer
hahaha ekat winner nanaman ang comment mo hahaha.. "Not to mention but i will mention maybe she thinks crocodile is not animal cause they are family" got me hahaha
DeleteWell im just telling the true. Her croc hermes bag is like her husband.. In terms of smoothness
DeleteLahat na lang binibigyan nyo ng masamang kahulugan! Kahit anong magandang gawin o sabihin nung tao, pag iisipan nyo pa rin ng masama. Nakakaawa mga taong ganyan pananaw sa buhay. Punong puno kayo ng hatred.
Deleteagree 2:00pm ... be open minded guys... anong magagawa ng haters ang bitterness... :) be happy... !!!
DeleteLol. Proofreading din or might as well ask husband to construct it for you. We get the point.
ReplyDelete12:14 You can start by proofreading yourself.
DeleteIf people are imposed penalties? ..... Waiiittttt. Baka naman if penalties are imposed to residents?jusko heart...
ReplyDeleteOA naman neto
DeleteTama naman kay heart...napaka elementary naman ng english mo teh...
Deletethat's the sentence I found off too.
DeleteHeart's sentence is fine. Masyado kang nagmamarunong 12:15 AM.
Deletehaha paano magiging off eh tama naman yung grammar nya. Bago mag feeling matalino, balik Muna sa school mga teh
DeleteShe used it correctly, kung sino ka mang nagkukunwaring grammar nazi.
Delete12:15- Just because it's not the type of sentence structure you're accustomed to, doesn't mean it's wrong. Di lang English style mo ang tama..
DeleteAnon 12:15AM, you nailed it right on the head!
Deletemali nga, lol! ito namang leah grace and anon 12:18, di marunong mag spot ng wrong grammar
Delete@8:25, passive voice ang tawag diyan. Tama yan. Kapag nagreply ka, pakilala ka at maglelecture ako sa'yo about passive voice. -grammar teacher
DeleteI agee with Heart on this one.
ReplyDeleteUnfair nga naman. Anong masama sa maraming pets kung naaalagaan naman ng mabuti š
ReplyDeleteHindi naman kasi lahat naalagaan ng mabuti. Even here in the US there are pet hoarders. Kaya they have the law as well na people cannot have too many pets...
DeleteNanood din ako ng animal
DeleteHoarders, sobra nga dun, pati pusa na patay na nilalagay pa sa ref nung maay ari,kasi hndi nila kayang itapon ang napamahal na sa knla.. Pero dito sa atin, korek m ako pag may nabalitaan ka, pero wala pa akong nabasa or napanood na balita.. Sa atin kasi pag may alaga ng ganyan, mentalidad, magbantay ng bhay para sa magnanakaw.. Pero dagdag pakain sa knla ang mga alagang hayop. eh karamihan dito, mahirap ang pinoy.
kaya nagkakaroon ng pet hoarders dahil din sa mga ibang mga taong iresponsable! Hinahayaan magpalaboy laboy yung pets nila tapos pag ginalis pababayaan lalo, kaya ang gagawin ng may malasakit na tao kukunin at aalagaan. E kaso ang hirap magpa spay/neuter dahil mahal! Bwisit na ordinance yan!
DeleteI agree with you 12:19. it will be unfair for those taking good care of their pets. ako im not from qc but upon hearing and reading this ordinance, its a big stupidity. mas madaming problema ang qc rather than the pets. i myself have dogs and even adopted a cat with her kittens and had neuter/spay and vaccined them as well. pano yung mga responsible owners like me? it will be very unfair. dapat siguro yung mga owners ng pets na mahuhuling palaboy laboy lang ang hulihin not all. nasa loob lang naman ng bahay anong problema dun?
DeleteLet's face it maraming iresponsableng pet owners, not to mention yung mga hoarders (I think me mental disorder sila). Ang problema kasi, pati ibang tao napeperwisyo, tulad ng maingay, di nabibigyan ng anti rabies dahil di kaya ng bulsa, tapos pag nakakagat ng ibang tao, walang maitulong. Kahit saan na lang eebak yung alaga nila, etc. OA lang si Heart na ia abandon daw yung pets ng owners dahil sa ordinance na yan. Pwedeng more than 4 pero hihingi ng permiso.
Deleteenglish pa heart. bat di na lang sabihin sa wikang filipino para masabi ng maayos.
ReplyDeleteNaintindihan ko naman, bat ikaw hndi? Hmmmm
Deletedi ko sinabi na di ko naintindihan. ang point ko yung pagkasabi ng maayos. maka react lnag di ka nagbabasa
Deletemalinaw naman at maayos naman. Hindi mo naintindihan.
DeleteAko rin naintindihan ko naman sinabi ni heart. Siguro heart basher kampon ni...
DeleteTama na nega, atleast naman nakikita natin na mahilig talaga sya pet, may breed man or wala..
Deleteah ok tamang tama nga naman ang english ni heart ano.
DeleteHuwag na baka mawawala ang tags na classy sa kanya. (pumatol ng basher)
DeleteHindi naman classy pero parang habang binabasa ko parang feeling ko si heart ang nagsasalita. Bipolar lang. Haha! Pero wala naman masama sa sinabi niya. I agree with her. Natural na sa atin ang mag ampon ng mga aso at pusa. Dapat bigyan din ng contraceptives ang mga alagang hayop kasi wala naman silang family planning. Bwahahaha...
Deletebash pa more. ikinaganda ng ugali at mukha mo yan Anon 12:19
Deleteshunga ang author ng ordinance na ito. nuknukan ng kashungahan. napaka Unconstitutional!!! grabe!!!!
ReplyDeleteI agree with you. Parang dapat ang pinapasa nilang ordinace eh yung mga tao na nagmamaltrato atska tinatali sa poste ang mga aso at binibilad sa araw.
DeleteCorrect! Bat yung mga nananahimik pa ang papakielaman! Nakakahigh blood sila!
DeleteKudos heart!
ReplyDeleteThis time. I'm with Heart. Ang daming problema sa Banda, pati ba nman pets? Pinoy nga nman
ReplyDeletePwede naman magtagalog. Nsa Pinas naman tayo...heart, it's the lawmaker imposed the penalties and its the people who are being penalized for the imposed penalties....omg!
ReplyDeleteTama naman grammar nya. It is the lawmaker who passed the law. The imposition of the fines are directed on the people (direct object). Hence people are imposed of penalties with regards to pet ownership. Stop being nega ang see the issue. Sana yung nagpasa ng law na yan mag volunteer sa Animal.Welfare orgs. Kasi wala syang karapatan manghusga if he doesn't know the situation. Saka sana inuna ang ordinance sa Free Kapon kaysa sa ganito.
Deletelaki ng problema mo. Better to analyze the content of the message and go beyond the grammatical errors.
DeleteAnother source of corruption.. Nakaka insulto sa mga voters ng quezon city. Wala na silang maisip na maayos na batas.
DeleteMay mga pet owners na kung ano dami nila sa loob ng bhay, ganon din bilang ng alaga nila pets.. Parang pamilya din talaga. Wala nabang maisip na batas, at pati mga pets eh pinagbabalakan ng pakialaman
ReplyDeleteKung naalagaan mabuti, why not?
ReplyDeleteAnother corruption, another milking cow ng goverment!! gATAS pa!!! Nakakainis talaga.
ReplyDeletekay heart ako! ang daming nag aalaga ng aso at pusa peor mahihirap naman so bakit kelangan pag multahin pa sila? grabe naman yan!
ReplyDelete12:22 sana ikaw din, magtagalog na lang. mas malala ka pa, basahin mo nga uli ang sariling comment mo.
ReplyDeleteUuuuyyyy..nagpapaka relevant. Hahaha! Buti na lang nahanap mo yan sa dyaryo noh. Wala na kasi ibang news na pwede ka magreact eh. May say ka lang sa mga doggy doggy and cats cats. Hahaha! Wala ka naman kasi talagang advocacy eh. Dog and cat lover ka lang.
ReplyDeleteahhahahaha korek
DeleteMas mabuti nang dog and cat lover kesa sayo, wag mong ma LANG ang pet lovers grrrr
Deleteikaw din nagpapaka relevant sa comment moa, mas lalong wala kang advocay! kahiya ka! atleast si heart involved sa advocacy ng paws!
Delete12:35 shunga! Ang ibigsabihin na dog and cat lover LANG siya eh hanggang dun lang naman ginagawa niya, yung mag alaga ng sarili nyang mga pets. Wala naman siyang advocacy. Bakit di siya magpatayo ng mga animal shelter kung talagang nagke care siya. Trying hard to stay relevant kasi yang hibang na yan. No actions to back up her words.
DeleteNag-advice pa sya na dapat quality food lang ipapakain sa mga dogs eh paano naman kung hindi mayaman ang pet owner? Paano kung kanin at ulam lang ang kayang ipakain? Dapat mag advice din sya ng mga alternative na pagkain na hindi mahal at hindi pang classy and elegant na katulad nya lol
DeleteDo some research, she's with PAWS, using her celebrity status for awareness
Delete2:25 tignan mo nga, she's with PAWS? Sinong may alam? May event ba siya o naging speaker for PAWS lately? Eh ang tagal na nung picture niya kasama aso o pusa niya noh. Hindi porket nagpose siya in a poster for PAWS eh advocacy na nya yun. Alam lang nila na dog and cat lover siya kaya nila kinuha. Pero wala siya talagang ginagwang work for PAWS.
Deleteswerte ni kuya kim at di sya sa QC nakatira, ang daming pets nun!
ReplyDeletetaga Makati na yata siya. madalas ko siya makita sa may San Antonio near Dasma...
DeleteHindi si Heart ang nagtype nyan, may apostrophe e.
ReplyDeleteKorek ka dyan!
Deletebka natuto na gumamit ng auto-correct lol
DeleteAs an animal lover, I'm totally against this. We take in strays, provide shelter and food. Maraming paraan to control animal population. May spay and neuter dapat na pinatutupad sa bawat city or better yet, magpagawa ng humane animal shelters. There are a lot of ways to consider, wag naman puro money-making opportunities ang palaging nasa isip nyo. Nakakabwiset!
ReplyDeletei agree with 12:45. i myself is an animal lover. if u really care for your pet you will find a way. bkt ililimit yung pets ng responsible owners? pano ang mga breeder? meaning pag nanganak ng madami ang pet automatic need na mapenalize? nonsense na ordinance!
Deletefor sure ang gumawa ng ordinance na to eh hindi animal lover.... ma karma ka sana....
ReplyDeleteSTUPID ORDINANCE
ReplyDeleteIGNORANT, SELFISH city council. I agree with her a hundred percent.
ReplyDeleteJunk this ordinance! This is so unfair for animal lovers!
ReplyDeleteI think this ordinance has been signed already? Is there any way to stop this?
ReplyDeleteMag welga ka teh
DeleteTRO? Hndi ako sure. Pero sasama ako sa kilos protesta kung meron. Im animal lover, this is unfair.
DeleteWhat's up with the City council? Puro non-sense ang mga ordinancies. Nakaka-insulto sa mga pet owners. Pagka-abalahan nyo kaya immediate welfare ng constituents nyo!
ReplyDeleteThe solution is not to limit amount of pets, but to implement a forced spay/neuter law!
ReplyDeleteWhat a stupid ordinance! Why not the city gov't provides Free anti-rabies shots for stray dogs and cats!Hindi yung pati animal lovers ay gusto pa ninyo kunan ng taxes!
ReplyDeleteAs long as i keep my pets in my private property and take care of them, I do not think anyone has any right to tell me how many I can have.Are these councilors for real? Next thing they might propose is the number of people who can stay in a house...
ReplyDeleteOr the number of cars one has. Or if anyone owns a bike or motorcycle. Any darn scam to earn money they can steal.
DeleteDito sa Davao City may DAD Ordinance.Davao City Adopt a Dog Ordinance.Dog loving City
ReplyDeleteKung PAWS si Heart, dapat hindi na rin siya gumagamit ng mga animal-derived products, tulad ng leather bags & shoes, tulad ni Natalie Portman. Regardless, kung yung ordinance eh for house pets lang, kung talagang PAWS siya at advocate siya for all animals, dapat itigil na niya ang paggamit ng mga animal-derived fashionista niya.
ReplyDeleteI assume that the main reason for this ordinance is due to animal bites which has been disregarded. If you think that this ordinance is the solution then you will be disappointed as this is just about 20% solution to the real problem. I am pertaining to those street dogs and cats - why don't you try to rescue them instead of looking into those sheltered animals? Or is it about the extra income they can get?
ReplyDeleteGo heart! Be the voice of the voice of the voiceless!
ReplyDeleteI have 65 pets. I am no breeder. We could barely make ends meet trying to provide for them, but we do, working our butts in order to do so. They are all vaccinated, fed regularly. This ordinance would entail my family to come up with at least 33k because we exceeded the 4 pets per household cap.
ReplyDeleteI just can't see the point of this ordinance...
ReplyDeleteI've seen a local documentary where a woman's dog was confiscated by the city (I forget which). The dog was fine living with her, and she obviously loved her pet. However, she was deemed unfit to take care of the dog because she had low income. At the pound, she couldn't claim the dog back because they were asking for a high fee. She visited the dog every day to bring her food, noting that the formerly cheerful dog had become depressed in the pound. I never got to the end, I don't know if the woman got her dog back. This was several years ago but the story bothers me to this day. I think this law might eventually have similar effects for households with more than 4 dogs or cats. They'll confiscate pets, make money off them by charging owners, and pets who can't be claimed will suffer. Then, more dogs and cats in poorly maintained pounds are going to be euthanized. Better to have free spaying and neutering programs than this law. I'm all for registration and health care, but this law is just going to allow authorities to abuse their power to make money.
ReplyDeletei wonder if this was written by heart, she doesn't use ' in most of her IG posts and the way she constructs her caption is way far from the usual. just saying :)
ReplyDeletePS: the writer (heart?) has a good point though
Paano kapag nanganak ang dog ng 4-6? You need to wean them asap pala para maipamigay mo na. Kawawa naman mga babies. Paano kung walang mabuting tao na kukupkop sa mga furbabies? Nakakakonsensya naman kung makikita mong dadami lalo ang mga aso sa paligid dahil ayaw sumobra sa apat ang alaga. Parang hindi yata ito ang angkop na solusyon. Hindi pinag-isipan mabuti ang ordinansang ito, imho
ReplyDeleteSana bago nyo pakialaman ang mga alaga ng may alaga ayusin nyo muna ang problema dito sa qc anu gagawin nyo sa ibang sobrang aso ipapakuha nyo at dadalhin sa dog pound eh wala na nga kaung mapaglagyan ang dapat nyong gawin yung mga stray dogs ang kunin nyo at bigyan ng pansin di yung mga aso na inaalagaan ng maayos grabe naman kau
ReplyDeleteHow about!...i-rescue nla ung mga stray dogs & cats. Kesa yan ung pinapatupad nla.
ReplyDeleteGo HEART! I totally agree with you!
ReplyDeletehack is now reading broadsheet paper hindi na pang tabloid :)
ReplyDeleteganun talaga if your husband is a senator. Hehehe
Deleteang tanong kelan kaya nila e-papasa ung FOI?
ReplyDeleteMalaking responsibilidad rin kasi ang pag alaga ng mga animals, kaya dapat talaga, mag alaga lang ng tamang number ng animals sa bahay.
ReplyDeleteSa kabilang banda, marami rin kasi talagang mga stray dogs & cats na nangangailangan ng bakuna at tamang pag alaga sa kalusugan. Eh, wala naman programa ang lokal na gobyerno para alagaan ang mga aso't pusang walang guardians.
Usually, yung mga ganyang ordinansa pinapatupad para ma-pressure ang mga tao pumili kung magbabayad ng multa o i-give up ang pets. So, sa puntong yun di rin ako sang ayon.
I am for this ordinance. May health issue din kasi na involved e. Kahit gaano pa kalinis yan, still it can bring disease. Isa pa, kung madami kang alaga may chances na meron kang hindi masyado maaalagaan. Isipin mo na parang maraming anak, merong isa o dalawa na magsa suffer. Agawan siempre ng food. Well, ibang usapan na kung ultra rich ang nag aalaga.
ReplyDeleteAs for Heart, kailan kaya siya matututong gumamit ng single period at mag construct ng sentence. Palibhasa high school drop out at ang english natutunan lang by hearing it from other people.
Bakit sa tingin mo maaalaggan ba yan sa impounding center... Tingin mo gagastos ang Q.C para maalagaan, mapakain o ma-vaccine yang mga animals... Pera pera lang yan.... Bakit hindi yung mga stray animals ang bigyan nila ng pansin imbes yung mga nag-aalaga at nagmamahal sa mg alaga nilang pets....
Deletepag walang aampon sa pound mapipilitan silang i-euthanize yan
DeleteI agree with you Reeya. Mucha Cha, hindi lahat ng may pets animal lovers, although they think that way. Tulad nung iba, ikukulong lang or ikakadena lang yung aso, tapos yung malaya nga di naman pinapakain, tapos dudumi kung saan saan.
DeleteThis is what you get when you elect meatheads in public office. How does this ridiculous and utterly stupid ordinance help "control" rabies and other so-called zoonotic diseases? I, for example, have more than 4 dogs and all are vaccinated (anti-rabbies, boosters, etc) and well-taken care of. My dogs never leave the house, and when they need to have their exercise, I have a big enough garage where they can run freely without disturbing my neighbors. I'm a responsible pet owner so why should I be harassed by this stupid ordinance (if ever it gets signed)? Bakit hindi niyo paigtingin yung kampanya nyo sa pagcontrol ng stray dogs and cats through free/mandatory vaccination of pets, information campaign, pagfine sa owners ng pets na pagala-gala sa kalye, etc. Bakit pati yung mga responsableng owners dapat madamay dito? Why do I need to register as a breeder ganung hindi naman ako nagbebenta ng aso? Madami lang talaga yung aso ko. Ang nakakatawa, pag nagbayad ka, pwede ka din naman magalaga ng higit sa 4 na aso/pusa. Ano ngayon ang sense ng pagbawal in the first place? Your guess is as good as mine. At isa pa, hindi lang basta hayop ang turing ko sa mga aso ko, pamilya sila para sa akin and I'm sure a lot of pet owners can relate to that. Kaya ano gagawin nila, kukunin yung sobra sa 4 kong aso na parang laruan lang? The level of ignorance in this ordinance is disturbing.
ReplyDeleteI have the same exact sentiments. Walang sense para sakin to. Pinupuntirya nila ang mga pet owners, unfair to sa mga responsableng nagaalaga ng hayop. In my case, may intances na pinupulot ko mga pusa sa kalye para alagaan and we have an enclosure at the back of our house. Never silang lumabas, gumala or namerwisyo. Gumagawa nanaman ng pagkakaperahan ang mga ampaw na yan.
Deletemay ordinance ka pang nalalaman...balik sa bahay hinihintay ka ng twins!
ReplyDeleteIf you do not care for pets then just leave the forum. You dont have to lambast heart for caring about animals.
DeleteMay kulang pa nga ang ordinance ng Mayor, dapat ipakapon ang mga pets para hindi dumami ang aso at Pusa sa PI. At isa pa kailangan sa loob ng bahay nakatira ang mga pets hindi sa labas na nakakadena, ang papayat pa nila, hindi yata pinapakain.
ReplyDeleteNice one heart! How is equating "being responsible" to "maximum of 4" in any way NOT absurd? That is a lazy metric. Something as nebulous a term as "responsible pet owner" requires better rubrics. Tutal binabayaran na din ang City Vet PER PET, due diligence na lang na mag ocular inspection at assess ng mabuti kung kaya nga suportahan ang pets. Putting an arbitrary number is just plain lazy.
ReplyDeletePaano pag nanganak ng lima yung aso mo ano gagawin mo papatayin? Anong klaseng utak
ReplyDeletePet responsibility has nothing to do with the number of pets you keep.
ReplyDeleteWala naman sa dami, ang pag trato sa kanila ang mahalaga, maski iisa ang aso mo pero turing naman ay burglar alarm na naka tali sa gate buong araw at gabi.
ReplyDeletethey should provide neutering or spayding service .
ReplyDeleteGood thing i dont live in QC. Or else riot ito. Bat hindi mga taong anak ng anak tapus di naman kayang magpakain ang prublemahin dyan? Bat kailangang mga animal lovers ang sagasaan? Mas dapat nga magpasalamat kasi me mga tao pang nagmamalasakit sa mga hayup. Paano kung nagpapakain ka lang ng mga stray cats gaya ng ginagawa ko sa garahe ko?Paano na pala kung 4 lang ang ang pets ko tapus nanganak? Ano gagawin pag di madispose agad? Pag di mabenta?meron na ba sila plano kung ano gagawin? I got dogs and cats and turtles as well. Pati turtles ipaparehistro ko din? Mag isip isip din kung minsan
ReplyDeleteSeriously Mayor???? Please focus in uplifting quezon city and making it a peaceful city again. There are so many snatchers and crime rate is going up.
ReplyDeletepati ang pagmamahal sa hayop, pagkakaperahan. anong klase yan. kulang na lang bigyan nyo ng tax ang aso at pusa ah
ReplyDeleteParang malabo. Sinasabi ng iba idispose or ipamigay yun babies pag nanganak yun aso. Eh pano kung tntreat namin yun doggies namin as part of the family? Hindi po kami namimigay ng family members. Wala bang kumontra sa paggawa nyang ordinance na yan?
ReplyDeleteTHANKS HEART FOR VOICING THIS OUT. HOPE U N SENATOR CHIZ COULD DO SOMETHING TO STOP THIS MADNESS
ReplyDeleteBefore you make this stupid ordinanace built a real animal shelter house first wherein stray animals will be well taken care of. This animals deserves also care and attention.
ReplyDeleteThe only animals that need to be lessened are the criminals in qc..
ReplyDeleteI don't think there's a problem with keeping heaps of pets in your house. Just make sure that you can provide the proper needs of your pets just like the needs of your family. Eg. vaccinations, vet fee, their food, etc. do it if you can! But if you can't, then shut up! Priority your family first before everything else. Be responsible!
ReplyDeleteUnfair. Buti nlang hindi ako nakatira dyan. Kawawa ang mga alaga Kong pusa. 31 kasi lahat sila.parang mga anak ko na rin
ReplyDeleteHow about!...i-rescue nla ung mga stray dogs & cats. Kesa yan ung pinapatupad nla.
ReplyDeleteBigyan ng milktea ang mga matatabang utak na lgu pra matauhan
ReplyDeleteHow about regulating the living conditions unto which the dogs are subjected to? Kung lower than four nga ang aso mo pero di mo pinapakain ng maayos or hinahayaan mo lang magkasakit/lumala ang sakit, eh di useless din.
ReplyDeleteso if cspable ka to care for as many as you can, bawal na at need to register? pano yun nag aampon ng stray cats n dogs, huhulihin na ri sila? hay naku... inncome generating yan kc mahal yun mga imported breed dogs n cats na nasa haus lang. kaya va ma-control ng tao ang magiging anak ng dogs n cats? so ano gagawin pag.marami anak, itapon sa basurahan kc penalize ka at di ka sunod sa batas? tsk tsk tsk
ReplyDeletePera nanaman!!! Ang dapat nilang habulian ay ang mga squatter dyan na nakawala lang ang mga aso na hindi vaccinated for anti-rabies.
ReplyDeletePrivate home owners have their dogs inside their property. May it be more than 4dogs they are still safe.
How about regulating the living conditions unto which the dogs are subjected to? Kung lower than four nga ang aso mo pero di mo pinapakain ng maayos or hinahayaan mo lang magkasakit/lumala ang sakit, eh di useless din.
ReplyDeleteAnong gagawin kong mabuntis ang alagang aso at pusa abortion bakit hindi kayo mag open ng animal clinic na mag sterilize sa mga aso at pusa para hindi nagkalat moning kong saan saan at tuta. Hindi ba mas effective yon? kailangan nga lang ng pondo ng city hall. Tapos strict monotoring sa may alagang aso at pusa.
ReplyDeleteThis is another form of corruption na naman.. hays.. why not magkaroon sila ng issued license for breeders and stop those illegal breeders instead yung tirahin nila mga pet owners eh kung naaalagaan naman.. mga pulpol talaga mga nakaupo sa gobyerno, mapa local man o National..
ReplyDeleteUmiral na naman si buwaya, hanap hanap ng pondo pag may time. Eh paano yan ang dami ko ampon na pusa, nanganak pa nga yung dalawa, magbabayad ako ng tax? di naman ako breeder, pinapakain ko lang yung mga naliligaw, grabe naman yan!
ReplyDeleteTHIS IS REALLY a nonsense Ordinace.. please lang..
ReplyDeletethis is bullshit!! as long as you can feed your pets ..take care of them.. and be responsible pet owner ..who will tell you to limit your pets.. it is not them who spends for their food! damn ordinance! I'll transfer to a different city instead!
ReplyDeletethe way I see it, bottomline ng ordinance na ito is all about Money! ngayon pati pag aalaga ng hayop na lagpas pa sa gusto mo eh pakikialam nila? lahat na lang pagkakaperahan
ReplyDeleteIf u like increased revenues, strictly impose penalty for those who smoke in enclosed areas, including jeepneys.
ReplyDeletedapat ipdesexed nlng ang mga aso at pusa like sa ibng bnsa den dpt mga responsableng tao lng ang ng aalaga kya nga dumdmi ung mga stray kase ng aalaga mga iresponsable mg.aalga tpos hhyaan sa lbs den mbbuntis ddmi dba? my god d mrunong mg isip ng ibbtas kung gusto nia umonti ipakapon .. euthanasia? hindi sgot yn sa ibng binsa nga pinptnggl n ung naggaganyan dahil bakit m tatanggalan ng buhay yan? dyos kb? wala silang kasalanan bakit dumadami sila!! my god bakit kase hinahalal yang mga artista !
ReplyDeleteEpal lang yan. Meron ng batas against cruelty to animals.
ReplyDeleteRevised nyo lang. Isama nyo mga "animal" jan sa city hall
True that heart! For the first time may sense ang sinabi mo..
ReplyDeletePondohan na dapat ng local government ng libreng anti-rabies. Tskk. Di lahat ng mga nag aalaga ng aso't pusa may pangbayad sa bakuna.
ReplyDeleteWell said heart!
ReplyDeleteNo way....yan sakin ano pakialam nyo sa mga alaga ko love na love ko ang mga ito kumpleto ang vaccine shot nila lahat at mahal pa ng pagkain nila mas mahal pa sa bigas na kinakain namin...at hindi nakakalat sa kalsada ang mga alaga ..ko nsa loob lng sila ng bahay namin at sosyal ang kanilang tambayan sa sofa lng naman ...gusto lang kumita ni mayor herbert kasi malapit na ang election nag hahanap sya ng panostos...kaya un ang naisip nyang pag kuhanan ng budget kasi alam nya maraming pet lovers sa QC....
ReplyDeleteSana yun mga pakalat pakalat rin na aso at pusa.
ReplyDeleteNo! How about yung mga animal lovers na nag-aampon ng mga pinabayaang pets sa kalye? Gusto lang naman nilang makatulong ah.. Mali talaga ito.. Tinatanggalan niyo ng pagkakataon ang mga kawawang pets na ito na magkaroon ng owner na magmamalasakit at magmamahal sa kanila.
ReplyDeleteGawa kayo ng gawa ng ordinansa, hindi nyo nga magawa yung trabaho nyo na hulihin yung mga asong gala sa kalye! Hahanap nanaman kayo ng mapapagperahan, pag pinirmahan mo yan Bistek ibig sabihin hindi ka nag iisip, Hulihin nyo lahat ang pusang gala at asong gala, yan ang asikasuhin nyo!
ReplyDeleteyup responsible pet owner but isn't it too much?! so does this mean euthanasia?? bullshit!
ReplyDeleteAnu gagawin sa sobra? Papatayin? Damn
ReplyDeleteKalokohan!
ReplyDeleteang naintindindihan ko lng dto pera ang habol n nmn nila.. sows.. 200 pesos registration??? libre ba bakuna?????malamang hinde!!! pati mga aso pagkakakitaan n rin ninyong mga pulitiko. grabe. kwawa ung mga breeders. tsk tsk.. PCCI please help us into protest..
ReplyDeleteKorek! Gatasan nga nila. Mag protesta tayo. And lets all remember na hndi na natin vote mga wala utak sa quezon city
DeleteCapture stray dogs, cats, and other animals that are wandering around public places without any leash or lingering around the streets without its owner. This ordinance is useless without proper implementation of other congruent animal ordinances.
ReplyDeleteNo to the ordinance
ReplyDeletesana mapagisipan mabuti Mayor...bka madami magalit s iyo lalo n mga kabataan
ReplyDeleteLahat nalang gusto nyong i- regulate. Imbes na ganahan yung ibang tao na mag adopt ng pets baka tamarin na sila dahil lahat nalang may bayad. Buti sana kung yung perang makukuha nila gagamitin para makapagpatayo ng animal shelter house.
ReplyDeleteNo more good officials in Q.C. Why limit the numbers of rats, mice, robbers or buglars, the squatters and of course the government officials who are doing nothing good and just receiving the taxes of the taxpayers money as their stravagant livings.
ReplyDeletedepende po siguro sa kakayahang mag alaga ng hayop ang dami ng aalagaan.
ReplyDeleteminsan po kasi, dumadami lang ang alaga dahil nire-rescue o napupulot lang sa kalye at binibigyan ng maayos na bahay ang hayop, hindi naman po dahil sa binili yung hayop o sadyang pinarami.
magiging kawawa naman po ang ang hayop sa kalye kung hindi na sila ire-rescue ng dahil lang sa na max out na nila yung pwede nilang alagaan.
Govt should worry about the strays , home is your sanctuary!
ReplyDeletecrazy ordinance edi dadami stray dogs lahat palayasin sa bahay pag sobra sa 4! Isip isip din pag may time!
ReplyDeleteSpay at neuter na lang po ☺️
ReplyDeleteallocate funds to have pets rescued from irresponsible pet owners - The city councilors have the funds - They have a pork barel fund which they can use for this instead of buying cars and votes from illegal settlers in their barangays.
ReplyDeleteCouncilors Raquel MalaƱgen and Jessica Castelo Daza - you have just lost my vote
ReplyDeletethey dont want to chase after stray cats and dogs since di sila kikita jan so go after households that give them shelter, multa sa mga residente noh? panalo ka bistek! LOL
ReplyDeleteMarami rin kaming aso dumami sila dahil inampon ko imbes na katayin ng kapitbahay namin.. at iyong mga pusa namin iyong mga nakakalat dito samin at pinapakain namin hanggang dito na sila tumira napamahal na sila samin...pano na lang kaya.....wag naman po kayong ganyan...iba na lang po pagkaperahan nyo PLEASE!!!!!
ReplyDeletedapat mag talaga nalang sila ng avid na manghuhuli ng pakalat kalat na pet un ang importante. this is nonsense
ReplyDeleteTama free na lang dapat ang kapon at vaccines yun ang tamang solusyon. Idadamay pa yung kayang magalaga ng marami.....
ReplyDeletePush mo yan heart! You have my support here...
ReplyDeletegovernment then must be homes for the extra cats that they will "arrest" and then "detain". pour in huge budgets for their food, medications, vaccinations, etc.... Di ata nagiisip ang mga quezon city councilors!
ReplyDeleteBat may limit?? And why does it always have to involve special permits with fees?? wala na bang ibang paraan?? this is just another money-making scheme...and what's next nito? QC will limit how many kids you can have?? IMO, the dog pound needs to do their job and be more efficient kung meron man prublema sa animal bites.
ReplyDeletei hate mayor bautista.
ReplyDeleteI don't think this is how we teach people to be resposible pet owners. What do you do now if you have more than four but you treat them well? And were did they get the magic number? Breeding however is a different story. What does it say about animal shelter for abandoned and abused animals? Or if I just want to save animals and keep them in my property?
ReplyDeleteWhat the?!? Calling mayor bautista!! Ano to?! Nananahimik mga aso ko, masayang naglalaro sa garden tapos papakielaman niyo?! Atupagin niyo un nga aso/pusa sa kalye at hindi un "domesticated". My god!
ReplyDeleteHindi na naisip un mga good samaritan na nagaampon ng mga askal.. like my dad. Tsk..tsk...
ReplyDeletesana lang mas pag aralan ang mga batas, instead na i-limit ang pag mamay-ari ng pets, dapat ipaigting ang kampanya sa spay and neutering ng animals lalo na sa stray animals. sa halip na magkurakot, ayusin ang mga shelter para sa mga alagang hayop na inabandona or naligaw at nawawala. makakabuti rin na ipa register or magka-lisensya ang mga pet owners para sa pag aalaga ng pets kung ang gusto lang nman ay makasiguro na maalagaan ito and mabibigyan ng maayos na pangangalaga. paghusayi ng ng lokal na gobyerno ang kampanya sa mga bagay na mahalaga tulad ng population explosion, poverty alleviation dahil kapag ito ay natugunan, mas magiging maayos ang lahat at mas madaling masolusyunan ang iba pang mga bagay gaya ng problema sa pag aalaga sa mga hayop.- Dhonna
ReplyDeleteInstead of this, bakit di ipagbawal yung naka park sa kalye/walang garahe pero nagkokotse! Kung ano anong kalokohan pinapasang ordinansa!
ReplyDeleteI really don't care about heart hahaha! I am however worried about this ordinance and its consequences..
ReplyDeleteGrabe ang writing skills ni Heart - wrong use or absence og punctuation marks!
ReplyDeleteKUDOS TO HEART!! Shame on Quezon City officials!!
ReplyDeleteEh papano naman yung mga excess na hayop diyan sa Quezon City Hall? Dapat ipatupad itong ordinansa na to sa mga nag-aalaga ng mga hayop na fixers, ghost employees at iba pang mga alagang hayop ng mga corrupt sa City Hall.
ReplyDeleteAnother stupid ordinance from stupid public officials..
ReplyDeleteso disappointing .. thank God for i am living in pangasinan with 5 dogs and 8 cats ...
ReplyDeleteWag kau epal pti pg aalaga bbgyn lmtsyon,d nmn kau ang png aalaga wag kau pckat dhl mas nkakairita gagawin nyo
ReplyDeleteAng hindi nila maintindihan is the fact that there are many families who view their pets as part of their family. Hindi mo naman pwedeng ipamigay o palayasin, o ipaampon ang isang miyembro ng pamilya mo kung alam mo naman na kaya mong alagaan! I have 4 adult dogs, 1 Puppy, 5 adult Cats and 5 kittens... hindi ko kyang itapon o ipamigay ang mga anak ng mga alaga ko, 5 of these "pets" are actually rescue cases. I have 2 jobs so I can support them, and give them what they need. Does it make me a bad citizen of Quezon City to be taking care of so many in my home? NO!... No one in the government can dictate how I exercise my humanity and compassion towards my family, pets included!
ReplyDeleteThis effin Ordinance is preposterous! Ayusin nila ang crime rate sa QC at magpasalamat sila na may mga tao na responsableng nagaalaga ng mga animals within the city! The more responsible pet owners, the less strays... Ilang beses nang sinave ng mga alaga ko ang mga anak ko from akyat bahays even giving up their lives just to save my children, samantalang ang QC Government walang nagawa!
Goo heart! Tama na muna ang pagpapaganda! Ipaglaban ang karapatan ng mga pets!!!
ReplyDeleteWag iboto mga yan! Unreasonable!insensitive!no respect for smaller forms of life what more sa mga tao?!haaay!
ReplyDeleteQC councilors gandahan nyo at galingan ang campaign at awareness sa mga hayup hindi yung basta gagawa gawa kayo ng ganyang city ordinance na d patas
ReplyDelete7% ang cases ng HIV sa QC. That's very alarming. Ano kaya kung proper education, awareness programs, at damage control kaya ang pagtuunan ng pansin ng mga politiko sa QC bago ang ganitong ordinance na obvious naman na money-making scheme nanaman. #hays #kawawangpilipinas
ReplyDeleteObviously penned by someone else, probably by Paws or Chiz. Anyway, sana huwag mapasa yung ordinance.
ReplyDelete