A content creator revealed that a Local Publication (LP) inadvertently skipped the excerpt of a local Social Influencer (SI) in a video endorsing a brand. The said brand assigned SI to promote in an international event. The said video showed several international influencers. The original video showed all influencers but the one uploaded by the local counterpart did not show the part of SI.
The question raised is if what LP did this is a standard practice of all local web pages. The irony is that LP chose to exclude SI who is among the personalities who placed the country on the map. Regardless of the hate given to SI, the fact is she has done the country a service.
Now that LP allegedly showed the negative side of preferring not to give SI space at all, watchers are wondering about the practice. LP might be exercising its prerogative to feature whom it chooses but respect is important. SI deserves to be respected. Moreover, the video was part of a sponsored event, which SI was selected to participate in.
Another question raised could be if money should be involved. Should LP have paid SI to appear in the said video? Will LP issue a statement or sweep the incident under the rug? Perhaps, LP thought no one noticed its action. These days SI prefers to choose her battles, and LP can probably relax but still, the disrespect is glaring.
‘You can't just sweep me under the rug like I won't come back stronger and better.’ — Demetrius Andrade
Please abide by the GUIDELINES in writing comments if you want them to be posted. Initials and comments that are too explicit will not be accepted.Follow @FashionPulis on Twitter and @fashionpulis on Instagram. Please continue to send your juicy stories to fashionpulis2023@gmail.com. Thank you very much for loving Fashion PULIS!
Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of Fashion PULIS. The management reserves the right to exclude comments that do not comply with the GUIDELINES in writing comments.
No comments:
Post a Comment