Ambient Masthead tags

Friday, July 22, 2022

Insta Scoop: Court Grants the Petition of Maggie Wilson on Property Issue





Images courtesy of Instagram: wilsonmaggie

175 comments:

  1. Talagang need nya i-update ang public sa mga ganap nya ano?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wag ka nga, saya kaya nang may topic ang mga maritess LOL

      Delete
    2. Like why not? Malaking tae kaaway niya so it should be transparent for her safety. It is clear babae ang dehado dito and you cant emphatize that?

      Delete
    3. Syempre nag aabang ka ih

      Delete
    4. Alam nya kung anong ginagawa. Respect is the key. Enjoyin lang natin ang pagmamarites.

      Delete
    5. Looking forward to updates after 72 hours! Bring scones and crumpets! #maritessteaparty

      Delete
    6. Unfortunately yes para ma-expose ang ex niya, her motive is to shame the guy using media which despises the so-called altas (ayaw ng iskandalo kuno)

      Delete
    7. Mas maganda to abangan kasi may natutunan tayo pag mayaman kabangga natin kesa dun sa nagbubuntisan.

      Delete
    8. Mara nmn mageffort ka basahin at magcomment kamarites

      Delete
    9. Yes kasi if she does it quietly, dehado siya. Alam mo naman ang justice system sa akin, pag may pera ka you can do anything

      Delete
    10. It’s her strategy to be transparent specially since she’s fighting with a powerful and rich family.

      Delete
    11. 3:59 Gusto nya lang soplakin yung mga Marites na sinasabing wala syang laban. By the results of this particular case, panalo sya which means di lang gets nga mga tao ang point nya, pero apparently may point naman pala sya. Yun lang yun.

      Delete
    12. Minsan lang tayo maging audience ng alta dispute. Buti nga to may frequent update. Just enjoy it. πŸ˜„

      Delete
    13. Ok lang yan para sa mga taong same ng pinagdadaanan niya na di alam ang legal remedies. Sa ngayon kasi consultation lang sa private lawyer mahal na. Di lang naman kasi sa mag-asawa nangyayari iyan. For every tenant or property owners.

      Delete
    14. Eto ang tunay na Alta Serye.

      Delete
    15. After this marriage yun na lang siguro ang meron siya,public sympathy

      Delete
    16. 3:59 asus gusto mo naman e. Otherwise, why bother?

      Delete
    17. Parang ikaw 3:59 - need mo ding mag comment.

      Delete
    18. Gusto ko itonh chismis ni Maggie,malakas maka high society.Bridgerton...dear readers...

      Delete
    19. Syempre post sya ng post pagkakataon nya to maging relevant

      Delete
  2. Go lang talaga dzai Maggie. I am on your side. Pag wag papa intimidate sa di porket mayaman akala they hold the power. Laban dzai!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tama di niya ako fan pero laban hehe

      Delete
    2. #teammaggie

      Delete
    3. So hindi nga conjugal property un?

      Delete
    4. #TEAMVICTORCONSUNJI

      Delete
    5. Kaya pala brownout kasi hold nila yung power

      Delete
    6. hay ang hirap pag bilyonaryo ang asawa..talo ka

      Delete
  3. What happens after the 72hrs?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Summary hearing for a judge to decide kung dapat iextend yung TRO (20 days max including yung initial 72 hours) until yung preliminary injunction hearing. She's being asked to pay a TRO bond just in case mafound ng court in the future na di necessary yung TRO at nagsustain ng damages yung camp ni Victor.

      Delete
    2. Yan din ang tanong ko. Siguro if the case will be raffled agad 'di na pwede galawin ng VCDC ang property hanggang wala pang decision ang court. Then she needs to post a bond pa worth 200K ba if I'm not mistaken.

      Delete
    3. During yhe 72 hour TRO, thr court should hear the case and decide if a preliminary injunction must be issued which will be effective pending resolution of the case or unless sooner withdrawn by the court

      Delete
  4. Hahahaha ang gulo. Lessee sya pero sabi nya the other day, ‘conjugal’ property daw yun. Ano ba talaga? Hahahaha

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yun nga eh.Kala ko part owner dyan itong si Maggie.The owner is not the same as the lessee.Bale lessee ay umuupa.

      Delete
    2. Puwede kasing lessee sila at nakapangalan ang lease contract sakanilang dalawa so conjugal.

      Delete
    3. Day hindi pwedeng lessee ang conjugal property.Conjugal means may right ka as an owner.Lessee,nangungupahan ka.If nangungupahan,there is another owner.

      Delete
  5. Come on Maggie. Fight the injustice that you are facing. You shall overcome this.

    ReplyDelete
  6. May kasunduan usapan at documents naman kasi si M. Nag power trip lang itong si V. Natakot lang dahil sa pa teaser ni M na meron syang shi-noot na tell all interview. Anu ba kasi tinatago ni V at laging powertrip pag may interview si M??

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ayun ngaaa...

      At kahet saan mo tingnan, ang petty nun tanggalan ka ng kuryente.

      Pathetic nun VIctor divuh?

      Delete
    2. Baka nasaktan ego dahil may kapalit na agad sa kanya.

      Delete
    3. Well, he stalked Maggie before they dated so he’s really pathetic.

      Delete
  7. Uy may pa legal content naren si Maggie. Sana diba noon po pa naisip yan. But anyway, oh girl siguro naman natuto na how to fight back ng tama. Less kuda more gawa.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Pero bakit need nya mag post ng bond? Can someone pls explain this? Any lawyer here? Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just in case ma find out ng court na di pala talaga need ng TRO or VC sustained damages instead.

      Delete
  9. Justice prevailed not money and power.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Bakit nasa petition nandun si Connor sa Bahay? Diba wala naman si Connor doon. Ang nandun is the 5 year old nephew. So ano, consunji rin yun anak ni Beth? Hahaha. Nahilo ako dai!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Pero TRO lang eto e. 72hrs. So ano next plan ni Maggie after this?

    ReplyDelete
  12. VC is inhumane. He wanted to evict his own son Connor also. OMG.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Sabi ng source ni ogie diaz, wala naman daw lease. Ayan o, may lease. Kaya wag sana nakikisawsaw sa awayang magasawa kahit relative ka pa o close friend. Nung pinanuod ko video ni ogie diaz. The friend of Victor is clearly a Maritess, ang Maritess kunwari concern, pero Maritess pa din. Kaloka.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Dear MW, VC, thanks for inviting us into your private lives. Blow by blow we are updated, thanks to your wife, MW.

    ReplyDelete
  15. After seeing MW’s post, i cannot help but think kung ganito din ba kabilis ang aksyon if regular na citizens lang ang may kaso… nasasayang ang gov’t resources dahil sa issue nila.

    ReplyDelete
  16. This only shows na nasa losing end si MW... pabago bago ang statement plus asking for public sympathy na sya.. gusto nya magside ang public sa kanya.. MW yung criminal case ang asikasuhin mo at may warrant ka doon.. wag mo na dagdagan ang problema mo kasi by the looks of it company property ang sabi mo ng nakaraan ay conjugal.

    ReplyDelete
  17. as it should be. that was wrong of vc and company to force her out of her home and cut the electricity. if they wanted her out then eveict her legally. even that adultery suit doesnt sit well with me. that was done to intimidate and as a bargaining tool.

    ReplyDelete
  18. after 72 hours pwede na palayasin?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Maggie deserves better.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Maggie do really deserves nothing but the BEST. women empowerment 😘

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry but i dont see women empowerment kay Maggie dhil may fault din sya s mga nangyayari sa kanya. Dpat maghold both parties ng accountabilities.

      Delete
    2. Kaloka yung the best. Ang oa

      Delete
    3. In my opinion,sana naman bilang legal wife may makuha man lang na property si Maggie after the separation.

      Delete
    4. 12:47 mas kaloka yung “do really deserves”

      Delete
  21. For now I’m not siding any of them yet because we didn’t not yet hear the statement ot other camp

    ReplyDelete
  22. Ganyan nalang. Present legal documents nalang kesa cryptic posts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kahit sya nag loko ng una
      Woman empowerment ka?
      If wlaa syang fault why ang arrangement nila is the son to be with his Dad and no to her…

      Delete
    2. Ay, iba. Marites lang, naghahanap pa ng legal docs.

      Delete
    3. Sabagay these legal docs are for public knowledge

      Delete
  23. Si Victor kung ibully si Maggie parang di ina ng anak niya. Very childish and power tripping. Mag joint custody nalang sa anak kesa nagaaway publicly di na naisip na makikita yan ng anak nila in the future. Parehas naman silang may karapatan sa bata eh

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Baka di matanggap na hiwalay na sila bet niya pa siguro tas may kapalit na siya agad.. haha for someone na mapera hirap makamove on si koya

      Delete
    2. Girl, halos di nga makita ni maggie anak nya kasi laging nasa abroad pumaparty.

      Delete
    3. Hurt siguro ang ego ni V. Power tripping talaga.

      Delete
    4. Vindictive yung guy. To think may kasamang bata pa sa bahay yung nakatira dun at puro mga babae, baka singilin pa sya ng karma nyan in the future.

      Delete
    5. some men are like that. Khit aswa kong gaslighter/ narcissist gnyn. Pg glit sila sau ippowertrip ka nila. Pg d ka lmaban lalu ka nila ippowertrip. Kea kng nsa tama ka lumaban ka .. Kita mo kng hndi sila manahimik.

      Delete
  24. Quiet na lng muna girl baka sumawa mga natitiranh naniniwala sayo. Ok lng kami mga marites

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hahahahha okay lang tayo mamsh. But she doesn’t need to be quiet. She should document everything online in case me mangyari sa kanya. Smart woman.

      Delete
  25. Ah so lease lang talaga siya. E bakit sabi nya last time conjugal property daw?

    Anyways, congrats, Maggie. Adultery case, next!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Alam niyo naguguluhan ako dito panong naging conjugal pero lessee sya.Meaning tenant.Magulo kausap si Maggie.

      Delete
    2. Kc umupa sila sa company na pag aari NG ex husband. So bka technically conjugal property yun after niya mag consult sa lawyer nalaman niya. And last year pa sila hiwalay, bka okay nmn nung una yung arrangement nila kaso nung ngka bf na si M nakakita NG chance si ex na gawaing pang bargain yung kaso NG adultery sa hatian NG yaman.

      Delete
    3. A corporation is a separate legal entity. Hindi nila conjugal property ang corporation ni Victor

      Delete
  26. Sana naman Maggie marami kang naitagong pera nung kayo pa para marami kang pambayad sa legal fees ngayon. Ayaw ko sa mga power tripper kaya support kita teh maski madaldal ka din masyado. Char

    ReplyDelete
  27. Leased/rented property pala, pero last time sabi mo conjugal property. Anyways, congrats girl. Yung adultery case naman... waiting kaming mga maritesses...

    ReplyDelete
  28. Bakit kasi umalis ka sa conjugal house nyo. Dapat si hubby ang pinalayas mo. Ayan tuloy, wala kang legit house.

    ReplyDelete
  29. After 6 days nag aantay pa din kami sa pasabog mo ghorl. Asan na? Hahaha

    ReplyDelete
  30. Team Papa Victor!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Alam mo mali si victor dito. Dba mayaman sya? Di siya inadvisan ng counsel nya na mali ung gnawa nya sa bahay na inuupahan ni maggie? Kahit pa sabihin mong di sya mag bayad ng renta, di mo yan pwede paalisin ng walang court order.

      Delete
    2. Bakit pinauupahan kay Maggie if Maggie is part owner? Kala ko conjugal yan? Ang gulo

      Delete
  31. Maggie is right. Property is conjugal until annulment is final and court decides who gets what. At the same time, the only party who can evict Maggie is the landlord. Consuji owns the property and is also the landlord . At the same token, Maggie is leasing the property. There is a lease agreement and Consuji can not evict per lease agreement. For those who are confused, Maggie is right. She's leasing the property and at the same time she also owns the property thru her-conjugal rights. . .unless there is a prenup agreement, then it's another story. Her conjugal rights are only limited to the percentage of ownership of Consunji. Looks like the property has several owners as per the number of defendants.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No.This cannot be.May prenup sila for sure.But even if you have a prenup,you can own conjugal properties if it was aquired after the wedding.But why is she considered a lessee? If this is a conjugal property.Her name should be found on the land title or articles of incorporation if she is part of the board who owns this property.

      Delete
    2. If the shares of stock is inherited from the father or family of Consunji then its not conjugal as per claim (its excluded on the absolute community) fyi

      Delete
    3. Yes agree ako kay maggie dito. Kahit na sabihin mo si Vic may ari ng Consunji na corporation, corporation pa rin ata may ari nung property hindi si vic. Separate ang corpo sa judicial person. Di yan kasali sa conjugal properties nila. At bilang nag rerenta si maggie sa corporation, they cannot evict her without court order. Kahit na di yan mag bayad ng isang taon.

      Delete
    4. This is my assessment too. Unless there is a pre-nup agreement. Then medyo mahihirapan si Maggie dito. That we don't know yet regarding pre-nup agreement if meron existing.

      Delete
    5. The property is corporate owned, not personally owned by Victor, therefore cannot be considered as conjugal property. Having prenup agreement is another story.

      Delete
    6. Pinagsasabe mo 7:44??? Naloka ako.. San mo pinagkukuha yan? What's your legal basis?

      Delete
    7. Finally somebody explained it well.

      Delete
    8. 12:24, 7:44 actually explained the legality of it. Try mo pa mag comprehend baks. Hahahaha.

      Delete
    9. No.She needs to prove that in court kung bakit siya naging lessee? Owners are not lessee.Magkaibang magkaiba. Pag may prenup walang conjugal unless specific the prenup.Is Maggie's name on the land title to make it conjugal? Is she part of the corporation ?

      Delete
    10. 2:55, this is 7:44. Consunji is a billionaire, a sophisticated businessman. I'm sure there is a pre-existing lease agreement. The property is under a C Corp. In other words, the corporation is a separate entity apart from his personal assets. Consunji, as owner of the corporation holds stocks and is a shareholder but works separately from the corporation. He is his own separate entity also. Maggie is a lessee through a lease agreement and also owns conjugal rights although this can be negated if she signed a pre nuptial agreement. One who holds billions never ever co-mingle all their assets in their personal name. They do all their business in the form of umbrella witholdings, corporations, partnerships, etc. It can become more complicated . Yes, one can own and lease a property at the same timeπŸ™‚

      Delete
    11. 9:11yeah thats the poit.Ang alam ko Billionaires,they are all protected by an iron clad prenup. Unless Maggie is part of the corporation that owns the property,then she is still considered a lessee and not an owner.

      Delete
    12. Kahot shareholder pa si maggie ng corporation, never magiging sakanya un corporation pa din may ari nun. Hiwalay ang corpo sa judicial person. PLEASE LANG PAULIT ULIT NA

      Delete
  32. What's the point of fighting for that property when she can't come home in the PH and live there anymore because of her adultery case?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Adultery case is a tactical move from the other party. Mahirap sa pilipinas dahil walang no fault separation kaya siraan ng credibility sa court. It will be interesting how she fights it. Sa totoo lang, ang unfair ng law pagdating sa adultery and how it's proven laban sa men and women. This will make for an interesting case study for all if it unravels publicly

      Delete
    2. 1st it's her right, conjugal property parin yan, kahit wala na syang paki alam jan nasa batas parin na it's a conjugal property

      2nd jan nakatira yung pamangkin nya na 5 years old

      Delete
    3. Pinatira kasi niya yung sister and pamangkin niya doon.

      Delete
    4. Kaya nga so what's the point nga? Yung sister nya ay FA so hindi din naman yun lagi dito.

      Delete
  33. Mayaman ang kalaban..wish ko lng maging patas ang batas..kht saan kahit kelan kawawa kababaihan..laban lng girl..kung may katwiran ipaglaban..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh plsss. Pareho silang can afford. She hired Divina Law. Stop making it poor wife vs rich husband. It's not

      Delete
    2. Hindi laging kawawa kahit kelan may times na babae din ang abuso.

      Delete
    3. Hello anong kahit kelan kahit saan kawawa ang kababaihan. Duh. Have you not learned from the Amber Heard JD case?

      Delete
    4. 1153 gurl, pagpahingahin mo na c JD at AH, kaloka! Ibang case yun kasi maski exes ni JD nagdeny na nanjujumbag sya ever. At ang evidence dun nakakatawa. πŸ˜‚ Dito power tripping tlaga c Victor at mukhang pareho nman silang may lovelife na maski kasal pa sa isat isa.

      Delete
    5. Uy baks, move on na sa amber at JD

      Delete
  34. Sana maisabatas na any divorce. Hay pinas ang bagal mo!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Matagal yan dzai dahil walang child support or alimony sa Pinas.Dapat may nakukulong tungkol dyan.

      Delete
  35. So based on the Contract of Lease pala, not conjugal.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Nasa Pinas ba si Maggie o nasa abroad pa rin? Kung nasa abroad. Bat di sha umuwi

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. May warrant of arrest sya. Pag umuwi sya ma poposasan sya

      Delete
  37. Maggie 1 point

    Victor 0

    Congratulations maggie

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actuallt Victor has 3 and thats criminal cases. This… is just a TRO for 24h in a civil court….

      Delete
  38. In a perfect world.. I wish.. sana maayos ang lahat. He and Maggie are together with their son. O diba, happy family sana...

    ReplyDelete
  39. Fight for your rights Maggie

    ReplyDelete
  40. All I can say is this..V is a cry baby. Inhumane yung tanggalan ka ng electricity just because they dont want to get out of the house. Squatters nga may notice or papatayan ka pag di ka nakabayad. Bakit sila walang abiso? Fight back, Maggie!

    ReplyDelete
  41. Abangan ang susunod na kabanta. …

    ReplyDelete
  42. It’s consunji

    ReplyDelete
  43. Kulang ng N yung Consunji

    ReplyDelete
  44. Gets ko naman at may point ang iba naten mga classmates dito na Maggie should have some pride and move to another home. Pero sa taong may prinsipyo at maalam sa kanyang karapatan ay hindi yan uubra. Saka sa ganyan thinking din kaya dumadami nakakalusot at abusadong mga lalaki/babae na nang aargabyado. Kasi kaya nga tayo may mga existing laws such as conjugal rights upon marriage is para walang madehado lalo yung side na hindi na naman mapera sakaling maghiwalay. Let's not shame men/women who wants to fight for their rights. Hindi pwedeng laging pride paiiralin.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Korek! Thats what V wants, M leaves at mahirapan. M should not give in! She has the right to stay there so she should stay. #teammaggie

      Delete
    2. paki sabi to sa mga G na G kay maggie lalo na yung mga lakas maka double standards.

      Delete
    3. True! Isa pa, maski nga suporta sa anak dyan sa atin pahirapan pa kasi nga nakakawork nman daw ang nanay. πŸ˜‚ Dito nman kay Maggie gusto nilang tumahimik nlang din. Ano to may kinikilingan ang batas? Aw di lumabag na tayong lahat. Lol

      Delete
    4. Korik ka jan kaya team Maggie talaga ako dzai.

      Delete
    5. Agree. Kaya madami ang na aaggrabyado kasi marami din naman nagpapa aggrabyado, kung right mo din naman yan eh di ipaglaban mo.

      Delete
  45. Sobra makalait yung iba dito ke Maggie. Hindi man siya kasing yaman ng asawa niya. I think she can afford naman to buy her own home. Infairness to her hindi siya tumunganga lang during her marriage. Nag aral siya at naginvest ng sarili niyang mga negosyo. It's just that siguro ayaw niyang matapakan ang rights niya.

    Frankly, mas lalo pa nga need to hustle and work more dahil malaking gastusan itong kasuhan nila ng asawa.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. anong mga negosyo pinagsasabi mo. yung swimwear business nya di nman yta kumikita.

      Delete
    2. Lol. Kung ako mayaman, mas pipiliin ko pang bumili ng new house kaysa magsampa ng kaso. Bukod pa sa magastos, hassle pa. Nagtatapon lang ng pera si Maggie. Mas masaya kaya ang peace of mind kaysa maging tama.

      Delete
    3. 2:32 yung Acasa business nya kumukita naman, di mo lang ramdam dahil hindi pangmasa ang pricing point. I follow a lot of interior designers so I know which pieces were sourced from her store.

      Delete
    4. Wala na ang Acasa 10:56. It was initially named as Casa Consunji then she changed it to Acasa Manila because she doesn't want to associate her name Consunji anymore. I know this kasi insider scoop ito. So that being said is already the timeline of their rough marriage. So go figure. Nagbigay na ako ng clue.

      Delete
    5. Kung mayaman siya like you claim,bakit pa niya kailangan ng property nung guy.Why not buy her own house.

      Delete
    6. 5:08 there are many reason why she would stay sa house na yun; like location para sa school ng anak nya, a lot of times, yan ang dahilan why people stay in a certain area. or could be something else, but whatever her reason is, she has a right to stay there.

      Delete
    7. 1121 she doesnt live there.Only her sister and nephew

      Delete
  46. Wise move din na de kampanilyang abogado ang kinuha ni Maggie. Kasi kahit sobra mayaman kalaban niya. Sa bigat din ng abogado niya di basta basta mahohocus pocus ang kaso nila. Kumbaga experto at siguradong papalag if magkaron ng ungguyan sa kaso.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sa true. Sa sobrang galing ng abogado niya, nakakuha agad ng TRO mula sa korte ISANG araw matapos i-file ang kaso. Iba na talaga kapag mayaman. Kung mahirap ka, sorry ka nalang kasi tutulugan lang yung kaso mo.

      Delete
    2. ganun naman talaga pag tro, pero hindi ibig sabihin panalo na siya... bandaid lang yan kumbaga, di pa din na resolve kung may karapatan siya dyan o wala

      Delete
    3. Lol you know nothing about them haha nkakatawa kayo

      Delete
    4. 2:03 Mas katawa tawa ka

      Delete
    5. 203 so ikaw may alam ka? Lol, echusera!

      Delete
    6. siguruhin lang nya na worth it ang laban na to para sa ibabayad nya sa lawyer’s fees. sometimes kase we have to choose our battles wisely. di ka basta sugod ng sugod, this is just a small win for her kung baga pinadama lang sya ng mga bilyonaryo. this is nothing to them. may mas malaki pa syang battle na haharapin at mas maraming perang susunugin.

      Delete
    7. 2:03 wala kang maayos na argument.Mag iodized salt ka

      Delete
  47. Lol post mo din ung result ng adultery case mo

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wait ka lang ka Marites. Ito nman atat. Lol

      Delete
    2. Abangan natin, hehe

      Delete
  48. Panalo pero out half a mil. Nyek. Careful next frozen asset while assessing equitable distribution. Quiet on the set na!

    ReplyDelete
  49. Malabo pa rin kasi lessee pa rin si Maggie hindi owner.Bat ganern.So kung ang lease contract niya until next year,hanggang doon na lang ang stay niya sa property.

    ReplyDelete
  50. I like this chismis.Malakas maka alta.High Society! Bridgerton ang ganapan.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Nakakamiss si Ricky Lo.Im sure kung buhay pa siya,nagkaroon na ng exclusive interview with Maggie.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She has social media followers, so she could always say her piece anytime she feels like to divulge whatever she wants to share to the public!

      Delete
  52. Cutting off electricity is a no-no. It’s like cutting the right to life of a person. Esp without court order.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Bakit may pinapanigan ang mga Marites dito? Hahaha remember pareho silang may kasalanan.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. kasi yun mga marites overhaul sa name pero utak still same old-talangka. filipinos gravitate towards money and power even if most of them should identify with those closer to them in profile. su h is the plight of a country conquered too often before.

      Delete
    2. actually maganda na nakakakita tayo ng magkaibang panig.Yhis case is an eye opener to married couples out there.Ano ang rights nila in terms of property

      Delete
  54. How about the adultery case. Sana ipost din yung update

    ReplyDelete
  55. The order of the court is just within the contract of lease, no mention that it is a conjugal property, so expect that once the contract ends then goodbye...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes.this is correct.If the contract of lease ends to.orrow,then Maggie and her family members should vacate the property.

      Delete
    2. Hindi naman siguro T kampo ni Maggie magaksaya ng panahon sa korte kung konting tulog lang yung term ng lease. Malamang long term lease yan, baka lease to own pa.

      Delete
  56. Kaya di ako nag law e. Mahirap ma intindihin hahaha! Salute to all lawyers and its 1-0 for Maggie vs Victor. Adultery case next na

    ReplyDelete
  57. 72 hours lang yan.. good for 3 days

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. pagmatapos anh lease contract then they can be evicted.Bye bye Felicia

      Delete
  58. This is one of my greatest fear is ung dating mahal na mahal mo na kinasal kayo and magka anak biglang ang ending demandahan and puro bitterness on both sides. I find this situation sad and disapointing. I hope maayos nila to sooner.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Same here sis. Nakikisagap lang ako ng balita dito pampalipas oras pero naiisip ko din yan. Nakakalungkot lang na noon yan yung taong nagpapakilig sayo, ngayon puro hatred na ang nararamdaman nyo sa isat isa. Kawawa lalo ang anak. Sana nga magkaayos sila kahit hiwalay na. Alang alang kay Connor.

      Delete
    2. True. Grabe diba 11 years din yan sila at ganito lang ang ending nilang dalawa. As a wife, nakakatakot no. πŸ˜‚

      Delete
  59. Just be thankful sa chismis kesa kay gaza nanaman tayo makichismiz πŸ˜‚

    ReplyDelete
  60. Kaya be careful with the laws we currently have in PH which favors men over women in matters of separation…. You have to play it out wisely dapat lagi two steps ahead ang thinking. And not emotional. MW seems to have been played by VC after an amicable separation kuno, she jumped too soon in making ladlad with her new jowa. Habang VC and his company are just getting more evidence to ensure full custody of their son and also MW not getting her half with their conjugal assets. Tandaan, kids stay with their mom by default and it would take a proof of immorality or psychological mental illness to get the kid from the mom. Yun ata ang goal ni VC.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Are F kidding me???!!!! In the Philippines, women are more favoured than men! They even take advantage of VAWC just to get what they want!

      Delete
    2. this is true.Also if they have a strong prenup.malabo yung nga conjugal assets lalo na nakapangalan sa corporation.Maggie shouldve been part of that corporation in order to own assets.Dapat ginawa siyang director etc

      Delete

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...