Sunday, August 12, 2018

Insta Scoop: Dingdong Dantes to Act on the Alleged Usage of Family Photos in 'Ang Probinsyano'

Image courtesy of Instagram: thedongyanatic

89 comments:

  1. Iba talaga ang mga faneys ng DongYan, tutok sa AP. Haha charot. Ang tatalas ng mga mata, amazing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 12:19 Hindi pwede may nag-sumbong kasi nung una okay pa pero nung ikalawa ginamit na ang mukha ng anak nila na which is very wrong wala namang problema kung humingi sila ng permiso na gamitin!Wala namang problema sa kanila yun

      Delete
    2. Kakatawa iyong kaF, pag product commercials na taga kaH ang endorsers ayaw iere tapos gumamit ng pics ng mga taga kaH ng walang pahintulot!

      Delete
    3. Ibang usapan pag ginamit ang picture ng bata without consent. Pwede makasuhan tama ba?

      Delete
  2. Picture perfect kasi ang Dongyan. But using Zia’s photo is very very wrong.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep kay zia sila may mali... Pwede sila makasuhan

      Delete
  3. yung mga damit lang pero yung face and background iba na

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ung kay Zia ginamit yung face mismo. Sa TvC or billboard nfa may bayad ang mukha. Lalo na may mga TVc na rin Zia

      Delete
    2. tawang tawa ako sayo baks. I don't know kung nagpapatawa ka. Well kung hindi, you're pathetically homurous.

      Delete
    3. Girl, kalat na yan at may clear copy. Inedit ng AP yung photo. Respeto naman sa tunay na may ari! Top rating show pero nagtitipid???

      Delete
    4. 12:42 lahat ng balita di pinapakita ang mukha ng bata pag minor bi-nu-blurred pero itong kay zia talagang bastusan na

      Delete
  4. Lisik na siguro mata ni Dong ngayon hahaha

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Atleast lisik mata n puro award at d bukbukin

      Delete
    2. Ang pagtatagpo nina Lisik mata at Bulol. LOL

      Delete
    3. hahaha si lisik mata at gigil mouth

      Delete
  5. I don’t think there’s any case you can file against AP because hindi naman binenta ang picture ni zia to earn profit. Too bad it was used without their permission but lahat ba ng TV shows and movies na May pinakitang picture ng artista na hindi kasama sa cast eh kailangan ihingi ng permission?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If they belong to different stations permission is needed. As if it's use to commercialize.

      Delete
    2. It’s respect, plain and simple. Parang lang yan sa facebook na magagalit ang magulang kung makita nilang ginamit ang picture ng anak nila na walang permission.

      Delete
    3. lahat ng nasa isang tv show o movie, dapat may clearance. maliit man o malaki. kung may makikita kang logo ng produkto. sa iba favorable yun kasi commercial. pero pag two years old, private citizen yun kahit celebrity baby, minor yun. mali talaga. dapat aminin ng managment ng AP ang pagkakamali.

      Delete
    4. Sabi na nga ba, ang mga Dantes pa ang lalabas na masama dito eh

      Delete
    5. 12:36 ang hina ng understanding skills mo sa mga bagay2 te. kaka-awa ka.

      Delete
    6. Wag na kayo magsayang ng oras magpaliwanag sa mga taong gaya ni 12:36. Di nya din naman maiintindihan. Ma HB lang kayo.

      Delete
    7. Ugali mo siguro gumamit ng gamit ng kapwa mo na hindi nagpapaalam.

      Delete
    8. Thats why they make u a sign media release form para pwede gamitin yung pic nila for that use. Obviously di nila ginawa. Ni hindi nga ata nagpaalam. Dami dami naman stock photos online, bat di nalang yun ginamit nila smh.

      Delete
    9. Ang Dongyan exclusive contract yan sa TV for GMA only.

      Delete
  6. Ung picture ng baby is a no.no.no.lagot,bakit hndi inedit lahat ksi..

    ReplyDelete
  7. Kung sila lang siguro ni Marian walang kaso but ginamit pa si Zia so a big No No

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bakit Hindi? E nasa Internet na e.

      Delete
    2. 7:05 mag aral k nga muna, un mga reason mo pang grade6 e.

      Delete
  8. If this will be brought to court i think this would be dismissed.. Kasi naman yung picture nila nakakalat sa internet. In this digital age mahirap na ipaglaban yang mga ganyan.waste of time move on na lang... But di ko pa nkita ang angng picture na si zia ang subject..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. kahit wag na natin tingnan muna ang legality, ang tanong, tama ba naman na mukha ni zia ang gamitin sa isang eksena na anak ni joko diaz ng walang permiso? ano ba naman yun bumisina naman kayo.

      Delete
    2. Hindi ko pa pala nakita makakuda ka na jan! Hahhaa kaloka utak mo teh @12:42

      Delete
    3. Sa mata ng mga tards ng kabila, ang biktima pa rin ang masama!

      Delete
    4. It will not be dismissed. Just because kalat does not mean AP did not violate copyrights. Putting it on a TV show which is obviously for profit makes it worse, its a textbook copyright infringement right there

      Delete
    5. 2:57 hindi kaloka ang utak ko te. Kung kaloka utak ko di sana hindi ako nasa law school. Lol according to one of our prof na labor arbiter minsan daw kung hindi naman worth it pag aksayahan ng time mas mabuti na mag move on na lang sa life rather than spending money and time and effort para lang sa isang case na masyadong mababaw ang rason. Sa tagal ng mga case hearing dito sa pinas minsan umaabot ng 10years before a final judgement is rendered... and worst daw sabi ni atta.pag malaking companya binabangga mo ey pagdating sa desisyon grabe nag influence ng bg company.. you know money talks.. i'm not siding with abs cbn ang akin lang lag na sayangin ni dongyan oras nila dito..ang dami pang pwdeng dapat gawin sa life life is too short make most out of it...

      Delete
    6. @1:30am kung ganyan utak ng mga law students ano na mangyayari sa future ng mga kasong ihahandle nyo. Move on move on na lang pag tingin nila di sila mananalo sa kalaban ganun? Haaay.

      Delete
    7. @1:30am kung ganyan utak ng mga law students ano na mangyayari sa future ng mga kasong ihahandle nyo. Move on move on na lang pag tingin nila di sila mananalo sa kalaban ganun? Haaay.

      Delete
    8. This is one instance where bragging about your level of education can backfire on you. Kapag may merito ang kaso at pursigido ang kliyente dapat ilaban 130.

      Delete
    9. 1:30 Migad. Srsly, law student ka? well, gudluck na lang sa mga future clients mo dahil tinuturuan mo sila maging DUWAG at hindi kayang ipaglaban ang justice na gusto nila, kahit pa minor offense lang yan. Where are your principles dear? Turuan mo na lang sila mag "move on"? ganun na lang yun?

      Delete
  9. Lagot,bakit kailangan ksi pati mukha ni zia pinakita.very wrong nman tlaga.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Knowing dong, edukadong tao yan at same with ap/abscbn mag-uusap lang yan. Si dong at ang abscbn/star cinema are very ok. Wag oa yung iba ha

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Still not a good excuse, unless abs cbn asked permission first from the dantes family. We are talking about invasion of personal property here and exploiting an innocent minor.

      Delete
  11. Personal photos pa kasi ginamit ng walang permiso kaya yan.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly. Personal. Tunay na kasal. Gagamitin pra mapagusapan?

      Delete
  12. First of all! Bakit kasi ginamit yung photo ng mag asawa at pati ung anak!?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Dapat punishable by law ang pag gamit ng pics ng minors online eh.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. true. sila dapat unang nakaka.alam nun diba nga, sa news nga pag may naka.capture na face ng bata blurred

      Delete
  14. I think for the sake of Zia na rin

    ReplyDelete
  15. Very wrong and unethical using babyZ's picture and the DY without consent. Really, action is needed so they won't do it again. They are lovely family and AP 's peg.

    ReplyDelete
  16. duh wala lang yan. dongdong is a good guy. magkaibigan sila ni coco at ng ABS so usap usap lang yan din konting sorry.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This ang iba kung maka comment parang may gyeta ng ganap. eh si dingong at coco pa na very diplomatic.

      Delete
    2. most likely mag uusap lang sila and settle it out of court. doesnt mean it was ok for AP to do that. mali sila kahit saang anggulo tignan.

      Delete
    3. alam naman nating mali pero yong iba parang sobrang dyosko pwede ba mag-uusap lang sila. \]

      Delete
  17. I think he will just ask for apology. Which they deserve.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Everything in public nowadays you can use it. Even the scenic beautiful photos now are being used. Dingdong should be elated pa nga.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. elated? baka kung anak mo yun maglululundag ka sa tuwa. not dingdong. nakaka-bad trip kaya ginawa nila na gawing part ng AP ang anak nila na wala silang kamalay malay.

      Delete
    2. 7:45 can be talk upon by two civilized people, much more friends in the industry duh kung maka react ang iba as if kung anong ginawa.

      Delete
    3. True, it’s alreayd public so that means the public can use it.

      Delete
    4. Ganito yan baks 3:51 and 8:51, halimbawa yung mga kanta na bagaman PUBLIC na (since kalat na sa internet and the likes) bawal pa ring ireproduce, i-distribute etc. or gamitin in any kind of work. Binibili pa rin yung rights pra gamitin as OST, jingle etc. Gets niyo na? At mabalik sa issue, tama pang pati yung bata eh isama sa picture? They could have edited it the least.

      Delete
    5. Katulad ng mga original designer bags bawal gumawa ng fake at ipagbili.

      Delete
  19. This is just a case of clumsiness of the staff. A sincere apology from ABS is enough.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree. mabuti na rin na point out. at baka maka tatlo pang offense ang staff nila.

      Delete
    2. I agree. Pero dapat mapag sabihan na ang staff niyan. Specially bata ang involve. They could have asked permission before using it. Or better yet, use the photo of their talents. Bakit from a rival network pa?

      Delete
  20. Nagtitipid kasi. Madami namang stock photos sa internet na pwedeng gamitin na pwedeng iphotoshop. Or yung photos ng anak mismo ng mga producers/editors.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Hahahaha....at least they changed the faces.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Well, that original picture has been circulatting on the net for a while so it’s already public domain.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You still dont get it. Public domain siya, pero pag walang permission from original owners at gagamitin for another public exposure is like nanghihiram ka lang ng gamit sa kaibigan mo ng walang paalam. Tama ba yan? At wag rin kalimutan na taga ibang network ang pinagkuhaan nila.

      Delete
    2. True, public property na yan.

      Delete
    3. Public property that should still own by some people, and cannot be reproduced. Para lang yan original dvd na dinuduplicate at pinipirata, which is unlawful.

      Delete
    4. iba ang sabihin ng public domain. halimbawa sa mga libro, bago maging public domain ang isang published na libro, may mga requirements na kailangan ma-meet kayulad ng kailangan patay na ng ganitong taon ang author, wala nang naghahabol ng copyright, kailangan ganito kahabang taon na ang lumipas mula nang ma-publish ang libro, etc. sa mga pictures naman, meron din public domain na picture, pero meron din na limited lang ang rights kahit pa sabihin na naka-publish online. kahit nasa online, hindi pwedeng i-edit, hindi pwedeng gamitin for comemrcial purposes, etc. so in short, hindi lahat nang nasa internet ay public domain.

      Delete
  23. naku lagot ka cardo=

    ReplyDelete
  24. promo promo lang. meron kasing bagong tv series si dingdong with dennis trillo. para naman mapag-usapan.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 11:02 ang babaw mo teh anong promo pinagsasabi mo dyan eh tlaga nman my pinaglalaban si dong sa ginawa nila

      Delete
    2. Hindi nga alam ni DD na ginamit ang mga photos nila.Basher at hater ka lang palibhasa sikat kaya inggit ka. Tinalo ang idol mo kung sino man iyon.

      Delete
  25. sa panahon ng fake news at photoshop, what's new? DD is very diplomatic and he will do what he could quietly. Coco must be annoyed at this as well. pero, nakakahiya ang ginawa ng staff ha.

    ReplyDelete
  26. That is the image of their daughter used in a teleserye that generates income. They should have asked permission and gave credit. Pinagkitaan pa din technically.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes and may mga commercials na yung bata, binabayaran yung image nya so no-no yan. ABS and AP shouldve known better

      Delete
  27. Ang mali ay mali wag ng ipangatwiran pa o ipagtanggol.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gaya nga ng sabi ng iba, yung gumawa pa ng mali ang ipinagtatanggol ng tards!

      Delete
  28. ginamit pala yung pic ni zia mas nagulat ako dun. hindi ko alam yon kasi hindi naman ako nanunuod ng probinsyano.

    ReplyDelete
  29. So sa tingin nyo ikababagsak ng AP yan?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Snabi ba na ikababagsak yan? Yun pnupunto dito, wala silang legal right gamitin yun image ng bata. Tard na tard lng sagutan e.

      Delete
    2. Honey, ang kamalian ng AP ang pinag uusapan dito. This is not about the ratings game or how good the show is. Kaloka ang logic mo. Kunsabagay, knowing dostards, yan kasi ang gawain niyo, ang manira, kaya takot kayo sa sarili niyong multo. smh

      Delete
  30. Sick and tired of Probinsyano. Sa totoo lang.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. true. baka ang susunod na kaso ni kardo ay hanapin ang salarin sa pagkawala ng diary sa mara clara

      Delete
  31. kwento recycled. actually naka ilang re-use na. Acting thame old ithyle of acting ni Coco. pati ba nmn ang picture recycled din. magkano b gagastusin nila sa pagbayad ng taga edit. World class dw sabi ng tards.
    anlaking tawa ko, nkakahiya. as in. LOL

    ReplyDelete

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...