Ambient Masthead tags

Friday, July 27, 2012

Letter from a Reader: Wrong Credit

Assunta de Rossi-Ledesma, 2012 SONA 

Assunta de Rossi-Ledesma, 2011 SONA

Dear Fashion PULIS,

I am an aspiring fashion designer. I built my clientele over the years thru referrals without using and hiring any PR to do it for me. I am a one-woman show.

I have no paid advertisement to any form of media except some features in Bridal Magazines. Those were struggling years indeed, that paid off eventually in the end.

It is a great experience and pride to get noticed by celebrities and other high-profile personalities and  get me to make clothes for them.

One of them is my friend Assunta de Rossi - Ledesma who tasked me to create gowns for her for the  SONA 2011 and 2012.

Both gowns were featured in Stylebible.ph, and I was quite proud of that. Being new in the fashion industry, having my creation featured in that fashion magazine was certainly big an achievement.  However an "error" was committed as the dress was credited in favor of Mr. Rajo Laurel.

I hate to think that this is a common practice done by some known and pompous designer towards a fellow designer of my status.

I am sharing this with you so that other designers will be forewarned. This negligence that has not been rectified may cause me to lose opportunities.

Thank you very much, Fashion PULIS for taking the time to accommodate this letter in your blog.

Respectfully yours,
Sheryl Vicente

102 comments:

  1. Fashion bullying?!?!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hala. Fashion bullying na agad? Di ba pwedeng honest mistake lang muna?

      Benefit of the doubt.

      Delete
    2. Honest mistake twice in a row? 2011-2012. Stylebible must issue an apology especially that RL is part of it. There's this thing called decency.

      Delete
    3. Hindi naman yata twice in a row. Mukang itong 2012 SONA lang yata ang hindi credited to Sheryl. Correct me if i'm wrong. Although, of course, an apology is definitely in order.

      Delete
  2. Ang hirap nito di ko ma-figure yung blind item...

    Sumasakit ulo ko! makatulog na lang kaya... :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hanudaw!!! Magbasa ka nga uli. Me blind item ba ditey?!?

      Delete
    2. Anon 8:20 AM - i hope you realize that the comment was just a sarcastic one. napaka-shunga mo kung di mo pa ma-isip.

      Delete
    3. hahahahahahaha!!!!

      Delete
  3. I dont like RJ! Overrated! Puro kopya! At may gana pa magmarunong at magmagaling sa PR. So much "pride" in his work eh nagmimintis naman at halata naman na nangongppya as per Fp's posts.

    And Sheryl, nice work!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think it was just an honest mistake on the part of style bible. I don't think it was intended that the credit be given to someone else. Maybe better to notify the site about it before jumping into conclusions.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Twice on different years?! Yeah right! Rajo Laurel and his team could have them corrected. Always a limelight grabber. Kaya di sinuot ni Jessica Sanchez mga damit nya eh. Next.

      Delete
    2. I agree. Twice on different years?! AND THIS IS SONA PEOPLE, SIGURO NAMAN IMPORTANTENG OCCASION TO. If they make a mistake on SONA, anong claseng site and trabaho to.

      Delete
    3. talaga? twice ba sabi?

      Delete
    4. Haller??? Tignan kasi mabuti bago mag assume! Anong twice dyan? The 2011 picture credits her naman noh!

      Delete
  5. OMG! Whose fault is this? Is this from stylebible.ph or from Rajo Laurel? Poor designer! :(

    ReplyDelete
  6. Baka naman typo lang

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. oo nga naman magka spelling ang Rajo at Sheryl

      Delete
    2. TYPO??? Buong name?!? Bwa ha ha ha!!!

      Delete
    3. Typo kamo anong letters ng keyboad niya chinese letters? Ang layo kaya ng name nila tapos tawaging typo error?

      Delete
    4. TYPO NGA SIGURO. MALAPIT ANG "r" sa "s"

      Delete
  7. Tsk tsk Style Bible should issue a public apology... very irresponsible...
    What about Rajo, he should also react or at least tweet about this misunderstanding!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rajo did not know about this wrong crediting done

      Delete
    2. I think its called erratum...

      Delete
  8. Masakit tlga yan. Naalala ko yung sa yearbook namin, yung "2nd Honorable Mention" napunta sa kasunod ko, tssssss...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ay ito ang pinaka masakit teh! ramdam kita! second honourable mention na nga lang, naging bato pa! at naitaga nga sa bato kasi forever na yun sa yearbook nyo! OUCH!

      Delete
    2. pak. haha.. sorry.

      Delete
  9. Malaki ba ang traffic ng Style Bible? Siguro mas makaka-affect ung na-report sa news na si Rajo ung designer.

    Well at least siguro naman the correction will be spread dahil pinadala ni Ms. vicente kay FP.

    Anyway, kudos to Ms. Vicente! Both of Assunta's gowns are just stunning. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think na-credit din kay Rajo yung gown sa news. Check the news vids. Tsk, tsk.

      Delete
  10. What does Assunta have to say about this?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Correct! Let's hear Assunta's side.

      Delete
  11. Yup Rajo and Assunta should have corrected this...

    I heard a story before na me time na nagpasalamat ang isang award winning actress for her make up courtesy of Fanny Serrano pero di naman si Fanny ang nag make up sa kanya. Kundi isang newbie din...

    ReplyDelete
  12. wow FP big help ka na now ha. thru your blog you can help some people to voice out their sentiments... bullying happens everywhere though

    ReplyDelete
  13. The site was updated already. Rajo's name was replaced.

    ReplyDelete
  14. The credit name's been changed to Sheryl Vicente @ Stylebible.ph. I just saw it

    ReplyDelete
  15. Good job on coursing it thru FP Ms Sheryl. Mas marami pa kasi readers si FP kesa stylebible.ph.

    ReplyDelete
  16. baka naman they took the picture from somewhere else lang, then stated that it was designed by RL? pero dapat naman nagtanong muna sila lalo na kay Assunta since sya lang naman may alam kung sino ang gumawa ng gown nya.

    But still, its the site's fault parin, typo or not. dapat kinontak ni Sheryl ang site before sharing it here, para walang gulo or issue.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I think its an honest mistake.

    Moving on, first gown is gorgeous and the second is HIDEOUS!!! Just saying.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not really hideous but not as eye catching as the first one.

      Delete
  18. Rajo Laurel is very active on twitter, he should at least
    inform stylebible.ph about this error.
    Stylebible.ph might be reading this already!

    ReplyDelete
  19. Grabe naman itey! Copycat's bible na nga, kumukuha pa ng credit kahit hindi sila ang gumawa! HA!HA!

    ReplyDelete
  20. Congrats! Sikat ka na ngayon =P

    ReplyDelete
  21. Baka naman wala pang nagsasabi sa Style Bible about this brouhaha kaya they're not doing anything about it.

    ReplyDelete
  22. sabotage!??! galing mo sheryll!! grabe nmn ang stylebible...dapat reliable ang source nila

    ReplyDelete
  23. If this is true, I feel for the designer. I was thinking if ever it happened the other way around, baka demanda ang ibandera ng lolo Rajo. The law should apply to all, otherwise to none.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Baka naman it's assunta's fault, maybe she gave the wrong name! I don't think it is rajo's fault, i mean, he has nothing to gain from it. It's not like assunta's such a big big superduperstar and designers are dying to design her e.g. Jessica sanchez tipong ganun

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jusko day! Big star na seo si Jessica Sanchez???? Kaloka ka

      Delete
  25. Dear AnonymousJuly 27, 2012 12:07 AM - Hindi ito blind item. naitama na ba yung credits? did she email stylebible so they could correct it? i think rajo laurel's voice should be heard, too. because what if he had no place in this "credit mistake" then to point finger at him steadfastly is improper and disrespectful. If this is stylebible editor's, copyrighter's and typers' faults then call their attention and order them to edit it.

    ReplyDelete
  26. actually when I saw Assunta's pic. sabi ko wow this is one of the best dresses that day.. then nakita ko "rajo laurel" sabi ko ah..kaya pala.. YUN PALA someone else (unknown) did it. ibig sabihin HINDI LANG SI RAJO ang TALENTED sa mundong ITO! Sheryl vicente, papagawa ako sayo ng damit!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. more power to Sheryl Vicente! Papagawa rin ako sayo!

      Delete
  27. Good for Sheryl Vicente to speak up. Sana magsalita din si Rajo para both sides ang marinig.

    ReplyDelete
  28. rajo, i think is part of fashion bible...

    why do designer, well known in ph fashion industry copies foreign or in this case bullies young designers, their creative juices had already dried up...

    imo, stick to designer who doesnt copy, switch to new designers empower them=)

    ReplyDelete
  29. Ok na Na-correct na ng StyleBible

    ReplyDelete
  30. FP, na address na po yung concern ni Ms. Sheryl. :) napalitan na po yung name ng designer sa picture ni Assunta. buti na lang nakita ni Ms. Sheryl.

    ReplyDelete
  31. I checked the pictures, na correct na details. Apology is indeed needed. From what i read above, may mga nakakita na at alam na si rajo nga. So may damage pa din. I googled. CHECK THIS LINK:

    http://www.pep.ph/photos/2455/Part_3%3A_Who_wore_what_at_the_2011_SONA/318

    Certain Heidi Mendoza daw.

    Kawawa nman to

    2nd time na nangyare

    ReplyDelete
  32. Even is the credit has been credited, stylebible should still acknowledge that a mistake was previously committed, why it was committed and apologize for it. More so since Rajo Laurel is PART of stylebible team. He has a blog on that website. In fact, Rajo posted an article about several designs he made for the SONA. Only 1 design "officially" made it to the shortlist.

    Again the facts that rajo is a part of stylebible and he benefited from a designer credit for a gown made by another designer...hard to believe the mistake was inadvertent. At the very least, stylebible and rajo owe Sheryl Vicente an apology and explanation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree. The least stylebible could do is to issue an erratum statement. Kahit sino naman masasaktan pang ung pinaghirapan mo ay ma-credit sa iba.

      Delete
    2. Very well said, Anon 12:44.

      An apology should be issued, regardless of the fact that it was corrected already.

      --mallrat

      Delete
  33. Masakit yan kase pinaghirapan niya ang gown. Kahit honest mistake. But I think it's better if style bible was alerted first. Fp should have been last recourse...But then again... Fp's blog is so sikat like that you know!

    ReplyDelete
  34. I think this letter was misplaced. The designer should have first called the attention of stylebible. If they haven't resolved the issue by penning an erratum message, then that's the time Ms. Vicente goes out to the public to air her loathing for the supposed "practice". Has she, actually gone out to call on stylebible for the mistake? She may be just jumping the gun here. Well, this could also be a PR stunt, who knows.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. so what if it's PR stunt! napaka SOP oriented mo day.

      Delete
  35. "I hate to think that this is a common practice done by some known and pompous designer towards a fellow designer of my status."

    Did Rajo say that it was his creation? Di naman yata. Para kasi ini-imply that there's a collusion between "pompous" (her words, not mine) designers and Stylebible (and other websites and fashion mags, I suppose), when it might have been just a simple mistake. It happens. Kahit pa part ng Stylebible si Rajo, it's not like he checks each article there.

    To me, ang dating tuloy is this designer is trying to drum up some noise by dragging Rajo's name.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. rajo is going down. who wants to be associated with him?

      Delete
    2. hi mareng rajo

      Delete
  36. So true!!! I agree with you!

    ReplyDelete
  37. I think some designers should stop copying creations from fellow/other designers may it be Local/Int'l as it doesn't do them justice. Coz people will just remember you as a copy cutter. Not good all.

    ReplyDelete
  38. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  39. True, credit should be given to whom it is due, pero feeling mo naman sinadya ni Rajo? Siya ba nag lay-out? Your letter is insinuating something malicious and negative. And why are you barking at the wrong tree? WHy not write to stylebible? Your letter was even worded in a way na parang ini-insinuate mo na parehong na-miscredit ang gown on two successive years. Kalurkey. If anything, you seem to be milking this issue for all it is worth. Napag-usapan ka tuloy. Clap clap clap.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^Oh hello there Rajo Laurel! ;)

      Delete
    2. Rajo, is that u?

      Delete
    3. May ovaries ako, si Rajo wala. And I doubt Rajo reads this site. Eh kayo, si Sheryl Vicente ba isa sa inyo?

      Delete
    4. Defensive Naman ni rajo! Malay niyo, sumulat muna si sheryl Vicente sa stylebible before sendin this to fp

      Delete
    5. Busy naman siguro si Rajo sa clients niya. lol. At balita ko siya gumawa ng damit ng entire Olympic delegate. Busy si Ateng. Walang panahon mag edit ng mga write up na anik-anik dahil di naman niya ata trabaho yun. Try ni Ms Vicente magreklamo sa editors ng stylebible. Yun nga lang baka badtrip na ang mga yun sa kaniya dahil sa pagpalaki niya ng issue na to. Baka wiz na siya mafeature dun again. lol

      Delete
    6. yup! anyway your attitude is totally crap rajo

      Delete
    7. im sure rajo reads this site. nagcocomment pa nga eh.

      Delete
  40. The gown is pretty, but not earthshaking or extraordinary in the design department. I think it's beauty has more to do with Assunta's ability to carry it off well. Napaka common nga ng design eh. A seamstress can make this. It's really unfortunate that someone got credited with the design first, and I feel bad for the actual designer, but for her to suggest na it was done intentionally, by the other designer no less, is laughable. What would it benefit him to be dragged into something like this? Surely he knows it would get corrected eventually and would just create unnecessary negativity on his part. Rajo Laurel is not a dumb duck to pull off something as juvenile as this. This is a perfect example of something blown out of proportion. Talk about over reacting. You will not survive the industry Sheryl if at this stage eh you're creating enemies. Don't always imagine that people are out to get you or steal your work. It's not like you're messiah of the fashion design industry. Just sayin'.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. rajo copies design form international designers and people knows it.. he is juvenile!

      Delete
  41. Bakit sa 2011 SONA dress ni Assunta eh by Heidi Mendoza naman nakalagay sa pep.ph?

    ReplyDelete
  42. masyoray ang mga creations mo teh.......................

    ReplyDelete
  43. Aminin na natin, marami talagang gumagawa niyan in favour of a popular designer. If they can get away with it, cool - especially like in this case one of the best dressed si Assunta. And if this is StyleBible's fault why would Rajo not correct them? A: Eh best dressed nga kasi eh. Sino sino bang dinamitan ni Rajo sa SONA2012, may napansin ba? Yes Rajo is very successful at the moment, but sure he has to keep the ball up as well. But not at the expense of others naman. Kawawa.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Pag sikat at nagawan ng error! Demanda agad. Pag mga ordinaryong tao lang OVER REACTING? Issue e pagkakamali ng stylebible . Bket di magawa ng style mag public apology??? Pero pag bigatin tinamaan nila baka gumawa pa ng Party yan. Mga sosyalera

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Demanda? Kaloka. Mayaman o mahirap, walang cause of action. Hinde kadema-demanda ang issue dito. Besides, si Rajo ang tinitira nung designer, eh according to you nga kasalanan naman to ng sylebible. Basahin mo yung letter teh. At bakit dito siya nagreklamo at di dun sa kinauukulan?

      Delete
    2. Kasi gustong sumikat.

      Delete
  45. Iyong sa 2nd dress, mas maganda iyong sketch kaysa actual... hehe.

    ReplyDelete
  46. The letter has served its purpose: publicity for the real designer. And along the way, badmouth the popular designer. Bravo. Great way to enter the fashion scene.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. nope, thats what you call responsible advertising bitch.

      Delete
    2. your a disgrace rajo.

      Delete
    3. si rajo ba to o mga tuta nya?

      Delete
    4. No more than you, Sheryl. LOL!

      Delete
  47. "si rajo ba to o mga tuta nya?"

    No, I'm neither Rajo nor his "pup." I'm merely a regular reader who'd call spade a spade. It's just that some people seem to think they can fool others of their true intentions. True, the dress was attributed to Rajo by Stylebible, why didn't the designer do the decent and civilized thing, that is, to contact Stylebible to have it corrected? I'm sure Stylebible wouldn't hesistate to correct it immediately, as they readily did when this issue was opened here. Why did she have to write to FP? Simple reason: She knows FP has wide readership and it's like an advertisement in itself. If you'd read the letter carefully, she was insistent on blaming Rajo, when in fact nowhere was it mentioned by Rajo that he made the gown. Stylebible corrected the name, and I agree that there must be some sort of erratum, but to do more than that is an overkill.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. wow dinibdib mo te? hahahha nahalata ka tuloy.

      Delete
    2. so what's your problem? thats what the designer felt so let it be.

      Delete
    3. overkill rin comments mo.

      Delete
    4. You are Rajos tuta. Stop lying to people around you!

      Delete
  48. ang pangit ng dinesign ni rajo laurel for the filipino athletes sa olympics!!!! have you heard from any of his friends praise his design??? ni isang blogger friend niya, wala!!!!!!! ni fashionpulis.com no mention nga about it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True! Sabay yata niyang dinesign yun sa mga guard ng Landmark. LOL

      Delete
  49. I really think as well this is OA.. we get where the designer is coming from but to write on this blog and blame and accuse RL and SB of a lot of negative things is just too much.

    why don't you try shooting 50-100 people, get their names and who they are wearing and put them all up on the internet the next day! Im sure one or two you'll (at the very least) misspell a name or (worst) credit wrong designers/brand. Just give it a try. If may mali, we'll put you on FP din! This is just unfair!

    Don't you think writing to StyleBible will be easier than ranting on blogs? Eh what if mademanda ka for wrong accusations? eeeeh for that, baka hindi ka na malagay sa StyleBible... wrong move

    ReplyDelete
  50. Nako. This isnt the first time Rajo grabbed credits from other designers' works. 

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kalerky. Style Bible nagkamali. Anong kasalanan nung tao?

      Delete
  51. mas masakit ung mali ung birth certificate mo tapos laki ng ginastos at pabalik balik mo sa maynila db ?

    ReplyDelete

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...