Ambient Masthead tags

Showing posts with label Repost. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Repost. Show all posts

Saturday, May 17, 2025

Repost: Cassie Ventura's Explosive Revelations on Diddy's Case

Image courtesy of www.people.com

Casandra "Cassie" Ventura began testifying against her ex Sean "Diddy" Combs in his sex trafficking trial on May 13 in New York City.

On the first day of her testimony, Ventura got emotional while going into detail over her decade-long relationship with Combs and the abuse she allegedly suffered. Ventura, who is considered the prosecution's star witness, also spoke about the alleged "freak offs" Combs hosted, which were sex parties where he allegedly forced her and others to have sexual encounters with male sex workers while he watched.

Ventura, who is married to personal trainer Alex Fine and eight months pregnant with her third child, also shed insight into her personal relationship with Combs and recalled some of the moments Combs allegedly took advantage of their 17-year age gap. Ventura continued testifying against her ex on May 14.

The hip hop mogul was arrested and indicted on charges of sex trafficking, racketeering and transportation to engage in prostitution in September 2024. He pleaded not guilty and has vehemently denied all the charges.

Here's everything to know about what Cassie Ventura has said about her ex Sean "Diddy" Combs in his sex trafficking trial.

Ventura went into detail over Diddy’s alleged "Freak Offs"

During her first day of testimony on May 13, Ventura spoke at length about Combs' alleged "Freak Offs" — sex parties Combs allegedly orchestrated involving women having sexual encounters with male escorts.

“The [Freak Offs] performance involved watching Sean watch me with another person and direct us on what we were doing sexually," she said in court.

Ventura recalled feeling "confused and nervous" when Combs asked her to participate in a "Freak Off" for the first time after she had recently turned 22.

"I knew it was something he wanted to do. I just remember my stomach falling to my butt. I had just turned 22 — didn’t have a concept the Freak Offs would be a turn-on," she remembered thinking. "I was confused, nervous, but I loved him so much.”

At the time, Ventura felt like she didn't have an option on whether or not she could participate, because she "didn’t know what ‘no’ could be, or what ‘no’ could turn into,” she said in court.

Ventura further claimed that the "Freak Offs" could last days at a time, and told the courtroom, "The longest was four days or even more with breaks. Then I was recovering from the drugs, dehydration — just trying to stay awake all the time. The Freak Offs became a job."

In addition to "performing" in the alleged "Freak Offs," Ventura also said that she was taking drugs to disassociate from the sexual activities that Combs allegedly coerced her to do.

“During Freak Offs, I would take [pills] all the time. If we ran out, we would call friends, drug dealers," Ventura said, while later adding, "For me it was dissociative and numbing. I can’t imagine doing any of it without a buffer — it was emotionless. I didn’t want to have sex with a stranger.”

Ventura claimed that she got sick from the drugs during some of the "Freak Offs," but Combs allegedly continued to force her to perform even after she threw up from the drugs. The drugs varied, but Ventura listed cocaine, ketamine, GHB, MDMA, ecstasy and mushrooms as substances she took during the "Freak Offs."

After the "Freak Offs" had ended, Ventura claimed she was often in charge of cleaning up the hotel rooms, which were usually filled with blood and urine.

Ventura alleged that Diddy would urinate in her mouth during "Freak Offs"

In addition to discussing what allegedly took place during Combs' "Freak Offs," Ventura also shared some of the things she had to personally endure.

Ventura testified that Combs or one of the male escorts he hired for the "Freak Offs" — or sometimes both parties at the same time — "would urinate on me."

When Assistant U.S. Attorney Emily Johnson asked if Cassie wanted Combs or the escort to urinate on her, she replied, "No. But there was no conversation. It was a turn-on for (Combs), so it happened."

Ventura claimed that she found herself "choking" at certain points because there was "too much urine in my mouth."

"I don’t want anyone to urinate on me," she said. "Sean would urinate in my mouth — not super often but often enough.”

Even though she didn't want to participate in the act, Ventura was "high and in the moment." She added, "There is not a whole lot of control you have with two men standing over you peeing. I thought it was obvious I didn’t want to do it."

In addition to having to ingest urine, Ventura also alleged that Combs forced her to have sex with male escorts while she was on her period.

“I was expected to have freak offs on my period," she said. "Sean would expect it. I don’t think anyone wants to do that.”

She claimed Diddy "controlled a lot of my life"

Ventura and Combs were in an on-again, off-again relationship until 2018, and Ventura recalled feeling "controlled" for most of their relationship.

“He controlled a lot of my life,” she testified, while adding that she was "naive" and a "total people-pleaser" when they began dating.

As the relationship developed, Ventura claimed that he would control her appearance and connection to the outside world. When he was displeased with something Ventura did, she claimed that he would "punish" her by taking away her phone, computer or other electronics for "however long I was being punished for."

“Sean is a really polarizing person; he was charming,” Ventura said on the stand. “It’s hard to really be able to determine what you need when he’s telling you what he wants. I just didn’t know. I didn’t know what would happen.”

Ventura also claimed that Combs enforced a strict exercise regimen and wanted her to dress a certain way.

“Some days he would want me to be really sexy," she said, "and be his woman other days." 

She got emotional while recalling how Diddy "taught" her about oral sex

During her testimony, Ventura looked back on the start of their relationship and got emotional while speaking about one of their first encounters at the Trump International Hotel and Tower in Manhattan just after her 21st birthday.

“I wanted to be around Sean for the same reasons as everyone else at the time — this exciting, entertaining, fun guy who also happened to have my career in his hands," Ventura said while starting to get emotional.

Ventura, who signed a 10-album deal with Combs' Bad Boy Records in 2006, claimed that during the meetup, Combs introduced her to oral sex.

"Sean taught me how. He gave me oral sex, I did not reciprocate — I just went home," Ventura said. "I heard about it from him. He made me feel crazy for not reciprocating but I didn’t understand and I was in a relationship with someone else."

She continued saying, "I was so young and I didn’t have the vocabulary and was just trying to understand it. I was sexually inexperienced. Leaving him was always confusing. I felt special and not a lot of people got that time."

She claimed that she was not sober when she had sex with Diddy for the first time

While speaking about her personal relationship with the defendant, Ventura discussed the first time they had sex after Combs gave her ecstasy.

"I was drinking wine, then started to take drugs, a blue dolphin ecstasy pill," she said about the encounter in Miami. "Sean gave it to me, I had never taken it before. I was just out of it, laughing, didn't know what it was until a little bit later."

Ventura recalled feeling "euphoric” and “really high, sensitive to touch and all of your senses.”

When their relationship began, Ventura claimed that Combs was still in a relationship with Kim Porter and that Combs was careful not to make it "look bad."

Ventura claimed Diddy recorded her sexual encounters for "blackmail materials"

While Combs was allegedly forcing Ventura to participate in sex acts during "Freak Offs," he was also allegedly filming her and using them as "blackmail materials," Ventura testified.

Ventura said she lived in fear that he would release the footage in retaliation, as "he had many resources to do that."

During her second day of testimony on May 14, prosecutors further questioned Ventura over what the specific blackmail materials were. She explained that they were "Freak Off" videos that showed her doing things that made her look "not great," according to CBS News.

She testified that it was "common" for Combs to threaten to leak the tapes when he was "upset" or if she was dating someone new.

"When he was upset about something. It was just a pretty common thing," Ventura said of the threats to release the videos. "Would say he was going to release them and embarrass me and put my career in jeopardy."

Ventura alleged that Diddy asked her to get into a pool filled with baby oil

Ventura was speaking about her involvement in Combs' "Freak Offs" when she claimed that during one of the parties, Combs asked her to get into an inflatable pool filled with baby oil inside a hotel room.

During her testimony, Ventura said that she was fully clothed at the time and did not want to get into the pool. However, she also acknowledged that she was more scared of the possible repercussions she'd face if she didn't follow Combs' wishes.

“Something that Sean wanted to happen, that’s what was going to happen,” Ventura said.

After Combs was indicted in September 2024, authorities said that they found 1,000 bottles of baby oil in his Miami and Los Angeles homes. However, Combs' attorneys disputed the number and his lawyer, Tony Geragos, later told the jury during opening statements, "You may know of his love of baby oil. Is that a federal crime? No.”

She addressed the now-infamous footage of Combs assaulting her at a hotel in 2016

On the second day of testimony on May 14, Ventura discussed the now-infamous surveillance footage of Combs hitting and kicking her outside a hotel room in Los Angeles in March 2016.

Ventura told the court that she didn't fight back, because it "just made him more violent, made him stronger." She explained that in the past, she had tried to fight back, but it "surprised" him.

"He was surprised I was actually fighting back— it made him have more anger, more frustration," she claimed, while later adding, “I did [fight back] more on the early side [of their relationship] and make it worse for myself."

Ventura testified that the 2016 assault left her with a black eye, bruised and cut lip and several bruises on her arm and legs.

The video was initially released in May 2024 and showed Combs grabbing, shoving and kicking Ventura near the elevator banks outside their hotel room. Combs was seen chasing after Ventura and violently assaulting her while she lay on the ground.



Wednesday, March 26, 2025

Repost: Kim Sae Ron’s Husband Denies Assault, Blackmail, and Pregnancy Allegations

Image courtesy of www.koreaboo.com

On March 25, 2025, Kim Sae Ron‘s husband released a statement through Garo Sero Research Institute about his late wife. He denied previous allegations of assault and blackmail from YouTuber Lee Jin Ho and Kim Sae Ron’s ex-boyfriend.

He revealed a photo of their marriage certificate as proof.

Image courtesy of www.koreaboo.com

"Hello. This is the late Kim Sae Ron’s husband. I wondered if it was right for me to step up because I am still in pain, and unable to get out of my own feelings. I wondered if I would be causing damage to Sae Ron and her bereaved. Although I carefully considered it a few times, there have been so many distorted facts that are being spread, thanks to a couple of forces. I made the judgement that severe slander of the deceased was happening, and have written this statement in order to set the facts straight.

I was just living life as I did, an ordinary person, when I met Kim Sae Ron around mid-to-late November 2024, thanks to an introduction from an acquaintance. Thanks to having strong attraction to each other despite the short time, we got married legally in America, where I live, on January 12, 2025, with only witnesses present. Later, we decided to void the marriage upon agreement from both parties, due to the fact that we got married too quickly without serious consideration out of having fallen in love, as well as due to practical problems of a long-distance relationship, and differences in personalities."  — Kim Sae Ron’s husband

Kim Sae Ron’s husband claimed that his house in America made assault rather impossible. Furthermore, Kim Sae Ron visited him 3 times in America. He reasoned that if he was abusive, she could simply cease to visit.

1. Regarding Assault

"The house I am currently residing in, in America, is a quiet apartment complex with very weak soundproofing. It is built such that if assault had taken place, the floor below would immediately make a report. In addition, assault in America results in strong legal responsibility. I am someone who has received a thorough upbringing in America. After I met Kim Sae Ron for the first time, from November 2024 to February 2025, we have met up a total of 4 times. Apart from the irst time I met her in November 2024, as I have to go to work, the last three times were when she came to visit me in America every month. If assault and incarceration had taken place, why would Kim Sae Ron voluntarily come to America each time? For myself, I also felt sorry that she had to sit through a long flight and go through the strict immigrations procedure at the airport, so I did my best financially and emotionally for her, so that she would be content whenever she visited America.

They said they had photos of the physical abuse, and I urge them to publicize the photos if they have them. If necessary, I will undergo police investigations." — Kim Sae Ron’s husband

Kim Sae Ron’s husband admitted that they openly shared information such as their social media accounts with each other. He claimed that these were mutually agreed upon due to their long-distance relationship.

2. Regarding my monitoring of her

"As we were in a long-distance relationship, we did not restrict access to each other’s handphones and social media accounts in terms of passwords. In actuality, Kim Sae Ron used my phone to contact people many times, and we freely shared our passwords with each other, and more, in order to build trust as a married couple. I can tell you that in actuality, we exchanged our passwords, etc, through DMs, as well as wrote promises to each other as a couple, and were also open with other information as agreed between us mutually.

Whenever she was in America, she was always with me, and we shared everything with each other, without secrets. I am in suspicion how they portrayed this as me “monitoring her moves,” but I think that this is a mutually-agreeable choice you can make as a couple. I can prove this with a written agreement we made as a couple." — Kim Sae Ron’s husband

He furthered that she had never been pregnant, and he had never blackmailed her into marriage as such.

"Kim Sae Ron’s Husband Claims She Was Never Pregnant"

Last but not least, he had faced threats recently by an anonymous source who claimed to be Kim Sae Ron’s cousin. Upon threat of legal action, they immediately ceased contact.

"Lastly, on March 18, 2025, someone contacted me anonymously, claiming to be Kim Sae Ron’s acquaintance. I will show you the message I received from them. I continued to talk to them, as I believed them to be someone I knew, but they lied and said that they were her older male cousin, and tried to provoke me multiple times, asking me about falsehoods such as why I assaulted her, blackmailed her, etc. When I said that I would be taking legal actions, they immediately stopped contacting me. If needed, I will request for a fair and just police inspection. Please immediately cease the spread of falsehoods about a deceased person’s personal life." — Kim Sae Ron’s husband

He ends off beseeching Lee Jin Ho and the others who have spoken up, to stop the spread of alleged falsehoods against the late star. You can read more about the initial allegations made about her personal life below.

Friday, March 21, 2025

Repost: YouTuber Claims Kim Sae Ron Was Married and Got Pregnant Prior to Death

Images courtesy of Instagram: ron_sae


On March 19th, YouTuber Lee Jin Ho released a shocking video titled "The Truth Hidden by late Kim Sae Ron’s Family." In the video, Lee addressed the recent lawsuit filed against him by late Kim Sae Ron’s family, stating that he is willing to take responsibility and apologize if he is found at fault.

Recently, the YouTube channel Garo Sero Research Institute claimed that Lee Jin Ho created content about the late actress Kim Sae Ron under the direction of her former agency, Golden Medalist. However, Lee firmly denied these allegations, stating that he did not act under any instructions from Golden Medalist. Lee also addressed allegations that “over 100 media outlets were contacted about Kim Sae Ron’s situation, but none of them published an article.” He stated that this claim is false and misleading.

The most startling revelation in Lee’s video was the claim that Kim Sae Ron had been secretly married. He presented Kim’s January 8th Instagram post captioned “Marry” as evidence of this alleged marriage. At the time, Kim explained that the post was just a snapshot taken with a friend and denied being married. However, Lee claimed this was not true and proceeded to share an alleged recorded conversation between Kim Sae Ron and her agency representative.

Image courtesy of www.allkpop.com

In the recording, Kim was asked, “What’s with that picture?” to which she reportedly replied, “My boyfriend posted it, not me.” The agency representative allegedly responded, “Is he crazy? I’ve been denying this, so you need to give me a straight answer. He’s going to post it again, right? You’re coming back to Korea on the 10th, aren’t you?” Kim then answered, “I’m coming back to Korea on the 13th, so I’ll arrive on the 14th.”

The conversation allegedly continued with the agency representative asking, “Where are you?” and Kim replying, “My boyfriend lives in New York.” When pressed about whether she was in a relationship or married, Kim reportedly confirmed, “Yes, we already got married overseas.”

Kim also allegedly revealed that she had a previous relationship with an ex-boyfriend referred to as 'B,' which ended due to company issues. According to the recording, Kim said that she had become pregnant with her current boyfriend but later had an abortion, which ultimately led to their marriage. Her current boyfriend is said to be a corporate employee in New York, whom she met through a mutual acquaintance. Kim also allegedly stated that her boyfriend was managing her social media accounts, including Instagram, and had posted the “Marry” post without her full consent before deleting it.

Lee also claimed that Kim’s hospitalization following a suicide attempt resulted in medical expenses exceeding 20 million KRW (approximately $15,000), which were not covered by her family but instead by her agency. He urged late Kim’s family to clarify the facts surrounding this matter.

Lee Jin Ho concluded by revealing that Kim’s family had also raised issues about her past relationship with actor Kim Soo Hyun. However, he emphasized that Kim had married her current boyfriend in the United States and suggested that more transparency was needed from late Kim’s family regarding the situation.

The allegations and revelations made by Lee Jin Ho have sparked significant public interest and controversy. Late Kim Sae Ron’s family and her former agency have yet to respond to Lee’s claims.

Video courtesy of YouTube: 연예 뒤통령이진호

Wednesday, March 19, 2025

Repost: Kim Sae Ron's Family Requests Apology From Kim Soo Hyun + Files Lawsuit Against YouTuber and Actor's Agency's Statement

Image courtesy of www.soompi.com

Image courtesy of www.soompi.com


On March 18, Kim Soo Hyun’s agency GOLDMEDALIST released a lengthy statement denying the recent allegations concerning late actress Kim Sae Ron.

GOLDMEDALIST’s full statement is as follows:

Hello, this is GOLDMEDALIST.

We would like to address the claims stated at the press conference held by the family of the late Kim Sae Ron in collaboration with HoverLab Inc. (hereafter referred to as HoverLab) as well as HoverLab’s YouTube channel.

We state our position regarding the second certification of contents.

During the press conference, the family claimed that our company’s second certification of contents sent on March 25, 2024 stated, “The notice includes that if you post a photo similar to the one posted on March 24 on social media, contact any of the actors from the agency, or if ‘Queen of Tears’ suffers any damages, you will be liable for full compensation.” In response, we are attaching the original text of the certification of contents to this statement.

As can be confirmed through the certification of contents, our company did not demand any compensation from Kim Sae Ron for damages related to [the drama]. It is also impossible to claim compensation for damages for posting photos on social media or contacting agency actors.

The reason we sent the second certification of contents was to provide Kim Sae Ron with a more accurate explanation of the certification of contents. As stated in our previous statement, we sent a notice by mail to inform Kim Sae Ron that our claims against her were in a “non-recoverable” state, allowing us to write off the debt and eliminate any potential for occupational breach of trust by our executives. This was the first certification of contents sent on March 15, 2024.

However, as is known, Kim Sae Ron sent a text to Kim Soo Hyun regarding this matter and posted a photo of the two on social media on March 24. The certification of contents sent on March 25 was intended to alleviate Kim Sae Ron’s concerns and explain the reasons for urging debt repayment, as well as to express our willingness to negotiate positively regarding the repayment. As explained in the attached second certification of contents, we informed Kim Sae Ron that “if the company does not claim the repayment of your loan despite the due date having arrived, there is a possibility that the executives of the client company could be liable for breach of trust,” and we expressed our “willingness to negotiate the method and timing of the debt repayment.”

The family claims that the second certification of contents effectively “demanded that the deceased repay her debt within a given period.” However, as previously explained, the second certification of contents merely states that we are willing to negotiate the method and timing of the debt repayment with Kim Sae Ron and requests that she inform her legal representative of a possible repayment schedule. There is no content urging repayment at all. The reason for including the request to “inform her legal representative of a possible repayment schedule” is that the purpose of the notice itself is to prove that “despite urging repayment, we were unable to recover it,” and therefore, it could not include any statement suggesting that “the debt does not need to be repaid.” If we explicitly stated that the debt does not need to be repaid, it would imply a debt waiver for Kim Sae Ron, which could lead to issues regarding a gift tax.

In fact, the day after sending the second certification of contents, on March 26, our legal representative communicated with Kim Sae Ron’s management agency to explain the purpose of the mailed certification of contents. In response, Kim Sae Ron expressed [through the legal representative], “We would like to express our gratitude for the sincerity your company has shown to our client over the past period, and along with this, we wish to convey our intention to take responsibility for the damages your company has incurred. With the determination of the amount of damages the client is liable for, we hope to coordinate and adjust the future repayment plan through mutual agreement.”

As stated in our previous statement, this effectively concluded the creditor-debtor relationship between our company and actress Kim Sae Ron. Subsequently, we would like to clarify once again that we processed the entire amount of the claim against Kim Sae Ron as an uncollectible accounts expense without any further demands or repayment negotiations immediately after (upon receiving the audit report on April 1, 2024). This indicates that our company never intended to pressure the late Kim Sae Ron for repayment of the debt from the beginning, and neither the deceased nor the family made any attempts to repay the debt afterward.

Furthermore, the creditor-debtor relationship between our company and Kim Sae Ron is entirely a matter under our agency’s jurisdiction. Kim Soo Hyun does not have the authority to comment on this matter. Therefore, we had to officially request [Kim Sae Ron] through the certification of contents that she refrain from contacting Kim Soo Hyun regarding the debt. We clarified to Kim Sae Ron that “debt repayment is not the responsibility of the employees or actors of the client company but rather a matter under the jurisdiction of the client company” and requested that she communicate only with the lawyers from our law firm who have been authorized to negotiate regarding the debt. There is certainly no content with statements such as contacting the client company’s actor would result in liability for damages. Nevertheless, HoverLab distorted the meaning in their report on March 17, claiming that we were “threatening to not contact not only Kim Soo Hyun but also anyone from GOLDMEDALIST.” However, we have never made such demands to our agency’s actors, and afterward, Kim Sae Ron continued to communicate freely with the agency’s actors.

When Kim Sae Ron posted the photo on social media on March 24, the drama “Queen of Tears,” in which Kim Soo Hyun was starring, was airing. Following this, from 2:14 a.m. when the photo was posted until around 11 a.m. when we issued our official statement, over 50 articles were published. Therefore, we felt the need to inform Kim Sae Ron that such sudden actions could impact the drama production company, the cast and crew, the broadcasting station, and all related parties. We reiterate that we did not pressure Kim Sae Ron regarding compensation for damages.

Our position regarding YouTuber A

Kim Sae Ron’s contract with GOLDMEDALIST expired in November 2022. After that, she was working with another entertainment company. The manager, who was claimed by HoverLab to have a relationship with YouTuber Lee Jin Ho, is associated with that other company and is not an employee of GOLDMEDALIST. Nevertheless, HoverLab distorted the facts by using statements that cleverly avoid legal responsibility, such as “We are at the stage of suspecting that person A, who said they are close friends, is a manager of Kim Soo Hyun’s agency.”

Our position regarding false claims related to actress Seo Yea Ji

HoverLab claimed on March 17 that our company conspired with media outlets to defame Seo Yea Ji based on an anonymous informant. This claim is a false assertion led by an anonymous informant, and even the manager who was in charge of Seo Yea Ji at the time, who has since left the company, contacted us in disbelief. We ask that they stop spreading false information without any basis or accountability.

We urge the bereaved family to cease the continuous circulation of false information.

In addition, the family has made many false claims against GOLDMEDALIST and Kim Soo Hyun. For example, they claimed that our company did not attend the deceased’s funeral. However, we visited the funeral hall on February 17 and February 19, 2025, to meet the family, offer our condolences, and leave a wreath and condolence money.

[A condolence wreath sent by GOLDMEDALIST to the late Kim Sae Ron’s funeral hall.]

HoverLab referred to the informant who leaked Kim Soo Hyun’s private life as “Kim Sae Ron’s aunt.” However, articles emerged stating that the informant is not an aunt. During today’s press conference, the family stated regarding the informant, “The mother (of the deceased) does not have a married sister. The aunt, who is more like a real mother to Sae Ron, is the one who recently gave an interview,” and described her as “someone who is more like a real aunt than a biological aunt.” It is common sense that when someone identifies themselves as an “aunt” in the media, they should mean the biological sister of the mother. The public’s trust in whether the informant is a real relative or a close acquaintance can differ based on media portrayal. However, the family ambiguously expressed whether the informant is a real relative or a close acquaintance during the press conference. Recently, many industry insiders have informed us that the informant is the mother of a certain actress.

The most important aspect of an informant is the truth of the information provided, not the identity of the informant. Our company is also clearly aware of this. However, we are mentioning the informant’s identity because the family stated during the press conference that “it is a very big mistake to involve family members” in relation to leaking photos containing Kim Soo Hyun’s private life. The photo in question, as revealed in past broadcasts featuring Kim Sae Ron, is of a home that Kim Sae Ron obtained after becoming an adult. It is unrelated to the timeline of the relationship claimed by the family. Nevertheless, they leaked Kim Soo Hyun’s private life under the pretext of “a very big mistake.” HoverLab has repeatedly hinted at the release of this photo, sensationalizing it with provocative language. The family cites the sensational reporting of Kim Sae Ron’s private life as one of the reasons for her passing. Therefore, we would like to ask what these actions are that the family and HoverLab are currently taking against Kim Soo Hyun.

HoverLab once again claimed through their YouTube channel that Kim Soo Hyun dated Kim Sae Ron during her minor years based on a photo posted on June 23, 2017 by a fan of Kim Sae Ron on social media. However, the person in the photo is not Kim Soo Hyun but someone else. HoverLab claimed that the outfit worn by the person in the photo is similar to a product that Kim Soo Hyun advertised in the past. However, the outfit in the photo is from a different brand than the one Kim Soo Hyun advertised.

[The person in the photo posted on Kim Sae Ron’s fan social media account is not Kim Soo Hyun but someone else.]

We believe it is unnecessary for our company to respond to baseless allegations based on a photo posted on a fan account, where the face is not even visible, that was brought to light. However, the family has made new claims that Kim Soo Hyun frequently visited the apartment where Kim Sae Ron lived with her family and secretly met when her family was not home based on this photo that does not even show a face. Kim Soo Hyun has never been to the location that HoverLab directly pointed out as “this elevator.” It was HoverLab that went there, not Kim Soo Hyun.

The family has publicly disclosed Kim Soo Hyun’s private life under the pretext of mentioning “more like a real aunt than a biological aunt.” Yet, they had never made claims that Kim Soo Hyun frequently visited Kim Sae Ron’s family home and had secret meetings during her minor years until now. However, after the photo from the fan account became known, the family suddenly began making such claims. We urge them to stop the act of attributing all sorts of non-existent lies based on a single photo unrelated to the essence of the incident or a post found online.

Friday, January 3, 2025

Repost: Park Sung Hoon’s Agency Clarifies Actor's Posting of Parody Poster of ‘Squid Game’

Image courtesy of www.allkpop.com

New information has just come to light in regards to the recent scandal involving actor Park Sung Hoon mistakenly posting an explicit parody poster to his social media. The 'Squid Game' actor briefly posted an explicit AV poster depicting a graphic parody of 'Squid Game,' but took the post down within a minute after uploading it.

Park Sung Hoon apologized soon after, with his agency, BH Entertainment, providing the explanation that the explicit poster had been sent to his DMs, resulting in him accidentally uploading it without realizing what it was. His representatives stated, "Park Sung Hoon received an overwhelming number of direct messages (DMs) on his social media. While checking the DMs, he accidentally uploaded the image.”

However, only a day later, Park Sung Hoon's agency has come forward with more accurate information regarding the incident. BH Entertainment issued the following statement:

"Actor Park Sung Hoon said yesterday, 'It was uploaded due to a mistake while checking the DMs,' but we would like to explain in more detail.

Park Sung Hoon received it (the Japanese AV cover) as a direct message, but he felt it was problematic, so he downloaded the photo in question with the intention of sending it to the company manager. He should have saved it, sent it to the manager, and then deleted it right away, but it was uploaded by mistake."

When asked why Park Sung Hoon would feel the need to report such a DM to his manager, BH Entertainment's representative answered: "I think he decided to send it because he thought it would be a problem that such strange things were floating around about his work."

In the wake of this recent incident, controversy has erupted surrounding Park Sung Hoon's future work. The actor is scheduled to star in the upcoming drama 'The Tyrant's Chef' alongside Girls' Generation's Yoona, but many netizens are now calling for Park Sung Hoon to step down from the role.

Tuesday, December 10, 2024

Repost: Jay-Z Denies SA Allegations of Teen Girl in 2000

Image courtesy of www.edition.cnn.com

A woman who alleges she was sexually assaulted by Sean “Diddy” Combs has amended her lawsuit to include allegations that she was also assaulted by Jay-Z at the same party.

The lawsuit was initially filed against Combs in October, but on Sunday the woman added Shawn Carter, the rapper and businessman known as Jay-Z, as a defendant in the civil lawsuit.

Carter is the first celebrity to be accused of sexual assault in connection to Combs.

In a statement addressed to CNN, Carter called the allegations “so heinous in nature that I implore you to file a criminal complaint, not a civil one!! Whomever would commit such a crime against a minor should be locked away, would you not agree?”

Combs was indicted in September on charges of sex trafficking, racketeering conspiracy and prostitution related charges. He pleaded not guilty to the charges and has denied all wrongdoing in roughly 30 civil lawsuits that have been filed against him.

The woman, who is identified as a Jane Doe, says she was 13 years old at the time she was allegedly assaulted by Combs and Carter at an after party following the Video Music Awards in 2000. The woman alleges she began to feel woozy after consuming a drink at the party and wandered into a nearby bedroom. The woman alleges Carter raped her first, followed by Combs. The woman says she hit Combs and ran out of the party, according to the amended lawsuit.

Carter was identified in the initial lawsuit as Celebrity A.

News of the lawsuit was first reported by NBC.

According to the lawsuit, Doe’s attorneys reached out to Carter to request “a mediation to resolve this matter.”

“Upon present information and belief, Jay-Z responded to said letter by not only filing an utterly frivolous lawsuit, but by also orchestrating a conspiracy of harassment, bullying and intimidation against Plaintiff’s lawyers, their families, employees and former associates in an attempt to silence Plaintiff from naming Jay-Z herein. This effort was meant to scare Plaintiff and to discredit her counsel. That effort failed. Indeed, Plaintiff chose to file this amendment as a result of the egregious conduct perpetuated by Carter,” according to the lawsuit.

In his response sent to CNN on Sunday, which was addressed to Doe’s attorney Tony Buzbee, Carter called the mediation request a “blackmail attempt.” Carter also said this lawyer, “who I have done a bit of research on, seems to have a pattern of these type of theatrics!”

In a statement from Houston-based Buzbee, he wrote, “The pleading speaks for itself. This is a very serious matter that will be litigated in court.”

Carter added in his statement that his “only heartbreak” is for his family: “My wife and I will have to sit our children down, one of whom is at the age where her friends will surely see the press and ask questions about the nature of these claims, and explain the cruelty and greed of people. I mourn yet another loss of innocence. Children should not have to endure such at their young age.”

CNN has also reached out to Jay-Z’s wife Beyoncé Knowles for comment.

CNN reported in November that an anonymous male celebrity filed a lawsuit against the Texas attorney representing the Doe, alleging he was the victim of an extortion scheme.

The celebrity accused Buzbee and his firm of “shamelessly attempting to extort exorbitant sums from him or else publicly file wildly false horrific allegations against him.”

Attorneys for the unnamed celebrity claimed further that Buzbee had “threatened to unleash entirely fabricated and salacious allegations of sexual assault” that included “multiple instances of rape of a minor, both male and female” if their client “refuses to comply with their demands.”

Buzbee denied the extortion claims against him, in an Instagram post in which he wrote that his firm “won’t allow the powerful and their high-dollar lawyers to intimidate or silence sexual assault survivors,” and in a statement to CNN.

“If you are trying to hide your identity and you claim you did nothing wrong, doesn’t seem very smart to take this approach,” Buzbee told CNN in an email at the time. “We will address it in due course.”

“I have confidence that with full public disclosure all of this will sort itself out,” Buzbee wrote.

On Sunday, Buzbee responded on social media to Carter’s statement, saying that the alleged victim “never demanded a penny from him,” claiming they only sought confidential mediation. Buzbee added, “She is emboldened. I’m very proud of her resolve.”

Friday, July 12, 2024

Repost: Bobby Yan Says Family Will Not Issue a Statement on Visits to Rico Yan's Tomb as Long as Visitors are Still Manageable

Image courtesy of www.news.abs-cbn.com


The late Rico Yan has become a trending topic on the video-interactive streaming platform TikTok. Some netizens, mostly Gen Zs who just caught up with Yan’s impact in the industry when he was still alive, have been uploading and posting past video clips and photos of the late actor.

There are also videos of fans, visiting and having their photos taken at Yan’s tomb at the Manila Memorial Park.

Some fans, from the more senior generations, found this a bit odd, disturbing and felt a sense of disrespect, especially for those who used the actor’s resting place for content.

ABS-CBN News sought the reaction of Yan’s family and exchanged messages with the actor’s older brother Bobby Yan. He said the family will not issue any statement for now, but they have spoken to the caretaker of Yan’s tomb and he was told that "it’s nothing to be concerned about, for now." He added that if things get bothersome to the neighboring mausoleums at the cemetery, then they will take action.

But for now, Bobby Yan said, “We welcome po anyone from anywhere. We have visitors from abroad visit Rico's tomb and there are visitors weekly since 22 years ago.”

Being a youth ambassador, Yan’s heart was for the youth, that is why the family believes that he won’t turn the Gen Zs away.

Yan passed away in March 2002, at the age of 27, due to acute hemorrhagic pancreatitis.

Thursday, June 20, 2024

Repost: Justin Timberlake Arrested for Drunk Driving, Released from Police Custody, Hearing Set

Image courtesy of www.edition.cnn.com, Sag Harbor Police Department

Justin Timberlake was arraigned on one count of driving while intoxicated and released from police custody in New York, according to his attorney.

According to police, the singer was observed around 12:37 a.m. Tuesday morning “operating his vehicle in an intoxicated condition,” in Sag Harbor, New York. Timberlake was driving a 2025 BMW when he allegedly failed to stop at a stop sign and failed to maintain in his lane of travel, a statement from Sag Harbor Police reads.

An officer initiated a traffic stop, Timberlake told police he “had one martini and I followed my friends home,” according to court records.

Timberlake’s eyes were “bloodshot and glassy“ and there was a “strong odor of an alcoholic beverage” emanating from his breath, its alleged in court records.

A Sag Harbor Village Police Department officer described him as “unable to divide attention,” adding “he had slowed speech, he was unsteady afoot and he performed poorly on all standardized field sobriety tests.”

Timberlake also rejected a chemical test three times, the first time saying, “No, I’m not doing a chemical test.”

The report contains details of his field sobriety tests. He was placed under arrest and held overnight for arraignment, according to police. He was also cited for running the stop sign and failure to keep in his lane, his attorney Ed Burke told CNN.

Timberlake was released without bail. His next court appearance is scheduled for July 26, the Suffolk County district attorney’s office told CNN. The appearance is expected to be virtual.

Sag Harbor is a village located in the Hamptons on eastern Long Island. Timberlake left the American Hotel in the area shortly before he was arrested, according to a source with knowledge of the matter.

Timberlake is currently on tour with his most recent album, “Everything I Thought It Was.” He is next scheduled to perform in Chicago at the United Center on Friday.

Over the weekend, Timberlake wrote a tribute to his two sons and shared his plans for Father’s Day in a post Instagram.

“My 2 greatest gifts. I learn more about myself everyday just because you both chose me to be your Daddy. I will always be there for you through your peaks and valleys… to lift you up and show you how high you can take this life and to pick you up when you fall. And, of course, to flood you with insufferable Dad-jokes all along the way. I love you both so much. Thank you for giving me my biggest purpose,” Timberlake wrote. “Now… for today: let’s play a game where we all just chill and let Dad watch the final round of The US Open.”

Timberlake, 43, is married to producer and actor Jessica Biel. The couple married in 2012 and are parents to Silas, 9, and Phineas, 3.

Thursday, May 23, 2024

Repost: As Per NY Post, Daughter of Kim Atienza Received Academic Sanction from UPenn after Joining Anti-Israel Encampment

Images courtesy of www.nypost.com

A University of Pennsylvania student who claimed she was left “homeless” when administrators kicked her off campus for participating in an anti-Israel encampment is the daughter of a wealthy Filipino family.

Eliana Atienza, 19 — who told the Philadelphia Inquirer she had nobody to turn to for help in the US after she was kicked off campus in early May — is the daughter of Kim Atienza, a prominent media personality in the Philippines who is partial to showing off his extravagant lifestyle online.

Her mother, Felicia Atienza, graduated from the Wharton Business School and has served as the president and CEO of several international schools over the years, according to the Washington Free Beacon.

The family enjoys flaunting their wealth on social media, with posts showing their extensive motorcycle collection, first-class flights with private showers and caviar service and hobnobbing with celebrities.

Despite being supposedly destitute herself, Atienza recently took a trip to Antarctica, according to posts from her own social media, and has traveled across the world to the likes of Alaska and Paris.

Nevertheless, Atienza claimed in an interview with KYW Newsradio that UPenn administrators had left her cast out on the street with nowhere to turn.

“I don’t have any family to go back home to here,” she told the outlet.

She was one of six students suspended from campus on May 9 for participating in an anti-Israel encampment that had taken up a campus green to protest Israel and its war against Hamas following its deadly Oct. 7 terror attack.

Police began breaking up the encampment the following day.

Atienza participated in unsuccessful negotiations with school administrators over the demonstrators’ desires to have the university divest itself of any investments connected to Israel.

She is also a part of Fossil Free Penn — devoted to having the school divest investments in fossil fuel companies — which co-signed a letter in support of “Palestinians who are fighting to liberate their lands from the Israeli Occupation,” published just days after Oct. 7.

Atienza did not respond to requests for comment.

Thursday, May 2, 2024

Repost: Angeli Khang Belies Any Involvement in Breakup of Bea Alonzo and Dominic Roque

Images courtesy of Instagram: angelikhang_, dominicroque


Angeli Khang has addressed the issue involving her in the breakup of Bea Alonzo and Dominic Roque.

In an episode of "Updated With Nelson Canlas," the actress denied that she was the reason behind the former couple's split. 

"Fake news po, fake news siya," Angeli said, adding that she has never worked with Bea and Dominic and hopes to work with them "soon." 

She also said that she and Dominic don't know each other personally.

"Tingin sa akin ng mga tao pag lumalabas ako na taray na taray talaga sa akin, parang ako talaga yung reason ng breakup nila. Gusto kong mag-explain sa kanila, wait hindi po, hindi po kami magkakilala," Angeli said. 

Angeli also admitted that she got a lot of hate from people after her name was linked to Bea and Dominic's breakup.

"Every time po na lumalabas ako, nakikita ko 'yung mga tingin sa 'kin ng mga tao na parang hate na hate nila ako. Kaya nung time na 'yun hindi muna ako lumabas ng one week. Hindi muna ako nagpakita sa lahat," Angeli said.

Bea and Dominic began dating in January 2021. They got engaged in July last year and planned to hold the wedding ceremony this year.

However, breakup rumors surrounded the couple in January. In February, they released a statement several days after Boy Abunda confirmed their breakup, announcing that they had decided to end their engagement.

Earlier this April, Bea removed all of her pictures with Dominic on Intstagram.

Meanwhile, Angeli is the the latest star to join the cast of "Black Rider."

"Black Rider" airs weekdays on GMA Prime at 8 p.m. after "24 Oras."

Sunday, March 31, 2024

Repost: Han So Hee and Ryu Jun Yeol Confirm Breakup

Image courtesy of www.soompi.com

Han So Hee and Ryu Jun Yeol have ended their relationship.

On March 30, Edaily reported that the two stars recently broke up. In response to the report, a source from Ryu Jun Yeol’s agency C-JeS Studio confirmed, “It is true that Ryu Jun Yeol and Han So Hee broke up.”

A representative of Han So Hee’s agency 9ato Entertainment further revealed, “Han So Hee and actor Ryu Jun Yeol have broken up. The two both found their roles as actors to be more important. They promised to no longer emotionally exhaust with their personal life.” They added, “Han So Hee gave herself and the public a difficult time due to her personal emotions. Her method of communication was incorrect. She will accept any criticism. Above all, the agency is greatly responsible for not looking after its actor. The agency is reflecting on failing to properly play its role. Although it is very late, we will go on to right things from now on. Please continue to watch with a warm gaze.”

Earlier in March, Han So Hee confirmed her relationship with Ryu Jun Yeol, and Ryu Jun Yeol’s agency further released a statement regarding their relationship at the time.

Wednesday, March 20, 2024

Repost: Rose Hanbury Denies Being Prince William's Other Woman Amidst Rumors on 'Missing' Kate Middleton

Image from Getty Images

In a new statement from her lawyers, Hanbury denied having an illicit affair with the next-in-line for the throne.

Rose Hanbury is denying that she had an affair with Prince William amid rampant conspiracy theories regarding the whereabouts of Kate Middleton.

The 40-year-old former British model -- born Sarah Rose Hanbury -- recently released a statement to Business Insider through her lawyers, denying any and all impropriety between herself and the royal, who is next in line to the British throne. 

"The rumors are completely false," Hanbury's lawyers told the outlet.

Kensington Palace, meanwhile, has repeatedly denied commenting on the rumors about an alleged affair between William, 41, and the Marchioness of Cholmondeley. 

Hanbury's name has been thrown around in recent weeks both on social media by those looking into "Katespiracy" -- the nickname given to the search for the absent Princess of Wales, 42 -- and by big-name celebrities and media organizations resurfacing theories about a forbidden amour from the late 2010s. 

Most notably, she was recently catapulted into the spotlight after Stephen Colbert name-dropped her during his opening monologue last week. On his show, Colbert, 59, was discussing Kate's sudden disappearance after the holidays -- which the palace has attributed to recovery from a January abdominal surgery -- when he called out the Hanbury theory. 

"The kingdom has been all aflutter by the seeming disappearance of Kate Middleton. Well now, internet sleuths are guessing that Kate’s absence may be related to her husband and the future king of England, William, having an affair," the late-night comedian said during the March 12 episode of The Late Show With Stephen Colbert. 

"I think we all know who the alleged other woman is, say it with me, The Marchioness of Cholmondeley," Colbert continued. "Now there have been rumors of an affair between William and [Hanbury] since 2019. According to tabloids, back then, when Kate supposedly confronted him about it, he 'laughed it off, saying there was nothing to it.' Aha, always a good response when your wife accuses you of cheating."

Rumors and speculation have only since spiraled since Colbert's not-so-subtle reference to the wife of David Rocksavage, the 63-year-old Marquess of Cholmondeley. Together, they share three children, twins Alexander and Oliver, 14, and Iris, 8. 

The Cholmondeley family runs in the same inner circle as William and Kate, with Oliver even serving as a Page of Honor at the coronation of William's father, King Charles III, in May 2023. Photos from the balcony at Buckingham Palace after the event show the young boy smiling and waving next to the Prince and Princess of Wales, as well as their eldest son, 10-year-old Prince George. Kate and William also share Princess Charlotte, 8, and Prince Louis, 5. 

When Kensington Palace first reported that the Princess of Wales had undergone a procedure, they shared that she would most likely not return to her duties as a senior royal family member until at least Easter (March 31). The Palace also noted that they would only be providing an update on the princess' condition if it was "significant."

Spooked by the sudden and uncommon lack of photos, however, the public immediately began sharing their concerns and speculating wildly about Kate's true location and status. 

Theories have ranged from bizarre (Kate is on this season of The Masked Singer) to hilarious (the Princess of Wales got bangs and she's just growing them out) to more serious and sinister theories ranging from a royal divorce or a death being covered up. It's important to note that the Palace has refused to give any legitimacy to these theories and maintains that she is simply taking her time recovering before returning to work. 

In a follow-up statement following the initial murmurs of "Katespiracy," Kensington Palace reiterated to ET the message of privacy amid her recovery.

"We gave guidance two days ago that the Princess of Wales continues to be doing well," the Feb. 29 statement read. "As we have been clear since our initial statement in January, we shall not be providing a running commentary or providing daily updates."

The speculation hit another level earlier this month after Kensington Palace shared a sweet Mother's Day post of Kate and her three children, only for fans to quickly spot and point out some obvious signs of Photoshop and picture manipulation. The photo was even given a rare kill order by the Associated Press after the fact. 

In a statement the next day, Kate copped to altering the photo and apologized for any confusion the photo and the amateur Photoshop job created.

"Like many amateur photographers, I do occasionally experiment with editing. I wanted to express my apologies for any confusion the family photograph we shared yesterday caused. I hope everyone celebrating had a very happy Mother's Day," she wrote in a statement posted to X. 

In recent weeks, the Princess of Wales has become more visible, making several outings including one with her mother, Carole Middleton, in which she is seen in the passenger seat of a black SUV.

An eyewitness told ET at the time that Kate and her mother were photographed in their vehicle around 9 a.m. just outside London. "The princess was low-key, looking out the window as her mother paid attention to the road," the eyewitness said. 

Just days later, Kate was spotted in the car with her husband on her way to an appointment near their home in Windsor, England. 

Additionally, she was seen out and about on March 16, visiting a farm shop with William a mile from their home, as seen in video footage obtained by TMZ. She appeared to be smiling and happy as she and her husband strolled around the Windsor Farm Shop.

Tuesday, March 12, 2024

Repost: Christopher Nolan’s 'Oppenheimer,' Big Winner at the Oscars 2024

Image courtesy of  AP Photo/Chris Pizzello

Source: www.bbc.com

Best picture
Winner: Oppenheimer

American Fiction
Anatomy of a Fall
Barbie
The Holdovers
Killers of the Flower Moon
Maestro
Past Lives
Poor Things
The Zone of Interest

Best actress
Winner: Emma Stone - Poor Things

Annette Bening - Nyad
Lily Gladstone - Killers of the Flower Moon
Sandra Huller - Anatomy of a Fall
Carey Mulligan - Maestro

Best actor
Winner: Cillian Murphy - Oppenheimer

Bradley Cooper - Maestro
Colman Domingo - Rustin
Paul Giamatti - The Holdovers
Jeffrey Wright - American Fiction

Best supporting actress
Winner: Da'Vine Joy Randolph - The Holdovers

Emily Blunt - Oppenheimer
Danielle Brooks - The Color Purple
America Ferrera - Barbie
Jodie Foster - Nyad

Best supporting actor
Winner: Robert Downey Jr - Oppenheimer

Sterling K Brown - American Fiction
Robert De Niro - Killers of the Flower Moon
Ryan Gosling - Barbie
Mark Ruffalo - Poor Things

Best director
Winner: Oppenheimer - Christopher Nolan

Anatomy of a Fall - Justine Triet
Killers of the Flower Moon - Martin Scorsese
Poor Things - Yorgos Lanthimos
The Zone of Interest - Jonathan Glazer

Best original song
Winner: What Was I Made For? - Barbie (Billie Eilish, Finneas O'Connell)

The Fire Inside - Flamin' Hot (Diane Warren)
I'm Just Ken - Barbie (Mark Ronson, Andrew Wyatt)
It Never Went Away - American Symphony (Jon Batiste, Dan Wilson)
Wahzhazhe (A Song For My People) - Killers of the Flower Moon (Scott George)

Best original score
Winner: Oppenheimer

American Fiction
Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny
Killers of the Flower Moon
Poor Things

Best adapted screenplay
Winner: American Fiction

Barbie
Oppenheimer
Poor Things
The Zone of Interest

Best original screenplay
Winner: Anatomy of a Fall

The Holdovers
Maestro
May December
Past Lives

Best international feature
Winner: The Zone of Interest

Io Capitano
Perfect Days
Society of the Snow
The Teachers' Lounge

Best animated feature
Winner: The Boy and the Heron

Elemental
Nimona
Robot Dreams
Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse

Best documentary feature
Winner: 20 Days in Mariupol

Bobi Wine: The People's President
The Eternal Memory
Four Daughters
To Kill a Tiger

Best cinematography
Winner: Oppenheimer

El Conde
Killers of the Flower Moon
Maestro
Poor Things

Best sound
Winner: The Zone of Interest

The Creator
Maestro
Mission: Impossible - Dead Reckoning Part One
Oppenheimer

Best film editing
Winner: Oppenheimer

Anatomy of a Fall
The Holdovers
Killers of the Flower Moon
Poor Things

Best visual effects
Winner: Godzilla Minus One

The Creator
Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3
Mission: Impossible - Dead Reckoning Part One
Napoleon

Best costume design
Winner: Poor Things

Barbie
Killers of the Flower Moon
Napoleon
Oppenheimer

Best production design
Winner: Poor Things

Barbie
Killers of the Flower Moon
Napoleon
Oppenheimer

Best make-up and hairstyling
Winner: Poor Things

Golda
Maestro
Oppenheimer
Society of the Snow

Best animated short
Winner: War Is Over! Inspired by the Music of John & Yoko

Letter to a Pig
Ninety-Five Senses
Our Uniform
Pachyderme

Best documentary short
Winner: The Last Repair Shop

The ABCs of Book Banning
The Barber of Little Rock
Island In Between
Nǎi Nai and Wài Pó

Best live action short
Winner: The Wonderful Story of Henry Sugar

The After
Invincible
Knight of Fortune
Red, White and Blue

Monday, February 12, 2024

Repost: Gillian Vicencio Speaks Up, Surprised at Being Dragged in KathNiel Breakup

Images courtesy of www.news.abs-cbn.com, Instagram: supremo_dp

Kapamilya actress Gillian Vicencio has broken her silence about her alleged involvement in the breakup of Daniel Padilla and Kathryn Bernardo, denying all the allegations and clearing her name.

In a rare interview, she said, “Nagulat po ako. Wala naman pong nangyari na ganun. First time ko po magkaroon ng ganung issue.”

“Hindi ko po alam kung saan nanggagaling. Nag-message po ako sa kanya (Bernardo) at hindi pa po kasi kami nakakapagkita ulit ng personal,” the young actress added.

She also said that if there’s a project with either Bernardo or Padilla, she would accept it.

“Project po ‘yun. Kailangan ng pera. Oo naman, kasi wala naman (malice),” she said.

Asked of the last time she texted or DM'd Padilla, she confidently said, “Hindi naman po kami nag-uusap. Matagal na rin po kaming hindi nag-uusap after nung taping. Nung taping lang talaga kami nakakapag-usap (as a group).”

Vicencio was part of the cast of last year's series "2 Good 2 Be True," starring Padilla and Bernardo.

Recalling the issue and the bashing she supposedly received, Vicencio admitted: “Hindi maiiwasan na makaramdam ka ng trauma. Hindi ko na matandaan ‘yung pinakamasakit na comment kasi marami po.”

How is she now? “Siyempre maaapektuhan ka naman talaga. Hindi maganda ang mga sinasabi. Dahil sa family and friends ko na hindi ako iniwan kaya medyo okay-okay naman po ako ngayon.”

Asked for her message to her bashers: “I cannot control the minds of other people. At least I know myself and my truth.”

Vicencio also shared her latest project “What’s Wrong With Secretary Kim” as well as a movie.

“Thank you, Lord, kasi mayroong blessings na dumarating. Mayroon akong tine-tape na series na 'What’s Wrong With Secretary Kim' and na-shoot na movie with Joem Bascon and other magagaling na indie artists.”

She ended the interview by thanking her defender and friend DJ JhaiHo.

“Sobrang thankful ako kay Mama Jhai kasi hindi niya ako ever iniwan. Andiyan siya to guide me,” she said.

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...