Ambient Masthead tags

Saturday, June 1, 2024

Tweet Scoop: Anne Curtis Notes Anti-Divorce Senators in Preliminary Survey of Jinggoy Estrada are All Male



Images courtesy of Instagram/X: annecurtissmith, inquirerdotnet

194 comments:

  1. Si Chiz ba anulled na 1st marriage nya? Kay Heart siguro gusto nya for keeps na kaya ayaw na sa divorce.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. hello?! he shouldnt be thinking of himself lang no!

      Delete
    2. Basta si cynthia villar happy ang love life at nagulat na pumasa na ang divorce sa congress. sya na ang matandang hukluban.

      Delete
    3. Read other articles, he said no kasi it's not affordable.

      Delete
    4. Oh eh ano naman pakelam ng ibang tao kung for keeps na sila ni Heart??? Di naman ibig sabihin oag nag yes sya sa divorce bill eh kelangan nila maghiwalay ni Heart. Anong logic yan???

      Delete
    5. Hipokrito naman ng Chiz na yan, di ba hiwalay sa ex yan kaya nakapagpakasal kay Heart?

      Delete
    6. Di nmn nya pede pakasalan si heart ng di sya annuled so malamang di ba

      Delete
    7. 6:09 hindi lovestory ito, he's in the business of legislating laws for the millions of filipinos.

      Delete
    8. Good job Anne for using your voice. It’s about time more celebrities use their platform to support this cause.

      Delete
    9. 9:13, that's exactly the point. Pro annulment but no to divorce? Otherwise, make annulment affordable and fast na lang kesa silang mayayaman lang may privilege sa mabilis na proseso ng annulment.

      Delete
    10. Feeling ko factor din na kaya sila nagNO dahil bawas support from religious groups. Again.. Politics.

      Delete
    11. 9:06 Hoy Bruha kumalma ka! Anong masama sa sinabi ko na kay Heart gusto na ni Chiz na for keeps. Ang point ko dun sa unang asawa nya anulled ba sila kasi kung oo ang hypocrite nya this time. Umayos ka sumagot ha ang OA ng reaction mo.

      Delete
    12. Wala siyang kwenta if he is voting based on his personal preference rather than for the best of the country and its people.

      Delete
    13. Political move yan. Religious sects will not vote for him in the future pag nag yes siya

      Delete
    14. 12:55 it doesn't mean anything. They can pay for another annulment if they want to

      Delete
    15. sen chiz had an interview a fee days before na the bill needs more provisions for the poor, he also mentioned na PAO should be allowed to take cases for divorce para sa mga kababayan natin na di afford maghire ng sariling abogado kaya sya nag-NO. ewan ko na lang sa iba.

      Delete
    16. Start with the solid law, eligibility criteria then amend the function of the PAO if needed.

      Make it easier for those couples who are in agreement to separate. Bring in lawyers only for special cases such as abuse and abandonment.

      Point is, focus on the law first!

      Delete
    17. Yung mga nag NO ay buo ang pamilya.

      Delete
    18. Si Anne na nag-NO dun idea na hayaan ang mga teenager na may crime na makulong

      Delete
  2. Takot sa hatian ng property at sa sustento.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly! Iyan ang kinatatakot nila. Sa annulment kasi ay null and void from the start, so walang hatian at sustento sa naging asawa. Sa divorce kasi ay may hatian sa properties at may sustentong kasama.

      Delete
    2. Exactly what I’m thinking lol

      Delete
    3. sexist tong anne curtis na to.

      Delete
    4. How is Ann sexist? Paki explain.

      Delete
    5. 1105 panong sexist eh she's merely stating a FACT. jeske!

      Delete
  3. No to divorce ang mga abusive egoistic husband/wife at mga religious na feeling tama at sila lang makakarating sa langit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm grossed out by the hypocrisy and I'm a conservative

      Delete
    2. Walang abuser kung walang nagpapa abuse. Dapat simula pa lang ng relationship or bago magpakasal tiniyak na ng both parties na hindi sila maaagrabyado at kung mahal ba talaga sila. Wala sana problema.

      Delete
    3. 5:08 kahit 10 yrs mabait na asawa sad to say over the years may mga tao talagang nagbabago at naghahanap ng iba

      Delete
    4. 5:08 anong pinagsasabi mo?

      Delete
    5. 508 Uy kahit masama daw ang live in ginagawa ng iba pero may iba talaga na pagkinasal nagiiba na.

      Delete
    6. 5:08 tiniyak ? Saang planeta ka Naka Tira.

      Delete
  4. Mga takot sa alimony kasi

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Takot din sa hatian ng kayamanan. Hahaha

      Delete
    2. Sa annulment ba wala?

      Delete
    3. 12:09 Sa divorce, the legal wife has the right to ask for spousal support regardless kung may prenup. At pwedeng habangbuhay kang makakatanggap ng sustento sa ex husband/wife mo. Gaya na lang ni Jamie Chua, the famous birkin collector na nakpangasawa ng mayaman. Iba ang alimony sa hatian ng assets.

      Delete
    4. Walang alimony sa annulment dahil null and void from the start ang marriage. Ibig sabihin ay walang bisa umpisa pa lang.

      Delete
    5. Kung gagawin nilang easy ang divorce so people can get access to the alimony part, nakakatakot talaga dahil magbabayad ka kahit wala kang kasalanan. Kung 'yan ang goal, wala ng lalaking gustong mag-asawa.

      Delete
    6. Wala. Kasi the marriage is null and void at the start, as if it never happened. Walang alimony. At makalat ang separstion of assets, kasi nga, there was no marriage to begin with.

      And we all know how pathetic child support enforcement is.

      So yeah, YES to divorce.

      Delete
    7. $332,000 ang monthly sustento kay Jamie Chua ng ex-husband niya since 2011. Sanaol. Hahaha

      Delete
  5. Chiz? Eh annulled ka nga. Hiwalay din naman ang ending nun.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe it was his wife who divorced him and he wanted to save the marriage? Look at how Heart and him worked hard to save their marriage so it comes as no surprise.

      Delete
    2. Hindi porke available ang divorce ay kailangan din nilang mag-divorce.

      Delete
    3. Yun ex wife mag problema siguro kasi bali-balita na dati pa na may ibang guy involved sa hiwalayan, si Jason Zamora ng Manoueveres dance group

      Delete
    4. yun nga nga. kung nakuha sa annulment bakit pa maggagawa ng divorce law. di bala?

      Delete
    5. Walang divorce sa pinas, so no, Christine did not divorce Chiz.

      And echoserong froggers lang, if you knew the reason of their separation, you would also know why chiz did not save that marriage

      Delete
    6. 12:37 ang init naman ng ulo sis! Hahaha chill ka lang.

      Delete
  6. We are all aware na sacred ang marriage pero maraming tao sa Pinas ay living in sin. May mga public servants at ordinaryong mamamayan na kaliwa’t kanan ang side chicks and illegitimate children. Asan ang pagiging sacred ng kasal sa sitwasyon na ganon. If they are against divorce maybe it’s about time na i-revised nila ang proseso ng annulment sa Pinas. Hindi porke’t masaya ang married life nila eh sila lang ang may K maging masaya.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you are concern sa sacredness, Church is against divorce. Church doesn’t recognize ang divorce lang. Need mo din mag annul sa Church if you want to get married in the Church again.

      Delete
    2. I don’t care about the church. Im not Catholic!

      Delete
    3. Those who are religious, get married in church and follow your rules, sanctity, spirituality and all.

      Those who opt to get married outside Catholic or Christian churches should have the legal means to get out of that legal contract. And the laws have to cater for this. Wag tayong plastic, zealot o hypokrito.

      Delete
    4. Nasa constitution ang separation between church and state so sanctity of marriage shouldn't even be brought up here

      Delete
    5. 10:49 hindi lang Catholic ang may church πŸ˜‚

      Delete
  7. tatandaan ko kayong lahat na nag no

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. tatandaan din namin yung mga nag yes.

      Delete
    2. 11:07 Ang labo mo kasi yung mga nag yes are not saying na idivorce niyo na mga asawa niyo kahit masaya pagsasama niyo. Tuloy parin naman buhay mo diba? Pero yung mga nasa loveless and abusive marriage, mabibigyan sila ng second chance. If it's not for you, why would you deny it to others?

      Delete
  8. Thanks Anne for using your platform to help promote awareness about which senators are favor or against a very important bill. I hope ppl use these facts as basis when deciding who to vote for in the next election.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Ganito kasi yan. Pang mayamang batas kasi yan. Di hamak na mas marami ang mahihirap na botante na walang pake sa divorce at di rin afford yan kaya No ang vote nila.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I’m surprised at sen Chiz! What a shame. SP pa yan ha. why o why? Kasi if it’s passed may habol yung ex wife? Annulled naman na sila so I don’t know, so selfish of these guys to just think of themselves and not the best interests of the people. Masaya kayo sa marriage nyo but this bill is for people who are in an abusive relationship. Divorce is a basic human right if you think about it. It gives people their life back, a chance to be happy again and it allows the kids to live in a home free from toxic relationships. Sa tingin nila kawawa mga bata pag hiwalay parents? Sa totoo lang, mas traumatic for the kids to live under the same roof as their parents who are always fighting. Parents will be better parents sometimes if they’re separated. Kaloka tong mga senators, Kala ko ba matatalino sila lalo na si chiz? Takot ka bang hiwalayan ni Heart? In all honestly naman kasi, H deserves better…

    ReplyDelete
  11. Grabe... Tatandaan ko lahat kayong nag NO.
    Ako kasal sa Korean national na iniwan din ako after a year at hindi na ako binalikan... Ni hindi ko na mahagilap...
    12 years later eto ako... Nakatali sa kasal namin, ni hindi ko mailagay sa dependents ko si lip dahil kailangan ng cenomar... 😒

    YES to divorce!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Under Article 41 of the Family Code of the Philippines, if a spouse has been absent for four (4) consecutive years and the spouse present had a well-founded belief that the absent spouse was already dead, he or she can file a summary proceeding to have the absent spouse declared presumptively dead, in order to remarry.

      I hope this helps.

      Delete
    2. Baks di mo talaga mahagilap? Pagawa ka ng MISSING person eme haha tas pag hndi talaga nagpakita pde na ifile na patay na si koreano para pde ka na mag asawa ulit. Deseeve mo maging masaya baks

      Delete
    3. Sa absolute divorce law, ground ang separation of the spouses for at least five years.

      Delete
    4. 1:15 this! Naunahan mo ko

      7:59 you should consult a lawyer. Masyado na kayong matagal estranged ni husband.

      Delete
    5. Minsan naman ay hindi ka lang sasagutin kapag tumawag ka, so ibig sabihin ay buhay pa rin.

      Delete
    6. Will ang sagot sa problema mo kung bahay, lupa or business ang pinag-uusapan. For insurance policies and pensions, you can put anybody as your beneficiary regardless of familial ties.

      Delete
    7. Girl, you deserve to be happy. Lawyer up and get rid of him legally in your life. He's basically nonexistent in your family anyway

      Delete
  12. Nice wan πŸ˜€

    ReplyDelete
  13. Wow! Good job kay Anne hindi sya takot mag voice out kahit na madami syang contracts

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ano po ba stand ng idol mo abt divorce? Nagtweet lng ng ganun, di na agad takot magvoice out?? Ng ano??? Pagcallout ba
      TAwag jan???πŸ˜‚ e fact naman na puro lalake nag No, bat parang bravery ata perception ng mga netizens janπŸ˜†

      Delete
  14. Yung mga walang paghahatiang properties wala namang pakialam lalo na kung may kanya-kanya na rin namang partner nadadaan na lang sa usapan na wala ng pakialaman. Kaya with or without divorce kung gusto na talagang maghiwalay gagawin din naman ng magasawa

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What it may kanya kanya na nga silang buhay but not yet divorced? All of a sudden, biglang yaman nung isa dahil tumama ng milyones sa lottery. Pag namatay yung isa, dun sa ex mapupunta mga assets nya kase di sila divorced regardless kung may mga bago na silang pamilya.

      Delete
    2. Kelan pa nangyari yung biglang yumayaman ang mahirap? Lol. Yung mga nananalo sa lotto, bihira lng nanalo mahirap jan. Madalas jan mayayaman din marami pangtayaπŸ˜‚ lahat ng mayaman either pinanganak ng mayaman or nagsikap.

      Delete
    3. kaya marami illegitimate children dahil sa ganyan mindset.

      Delete
    4. 12:07, masyado mo sineryoso yung example ni 11:28. In real life nangyayari yan. Naghiwalay pero di annuled, umasenso yung isa at namatay. Pero dahil hindi annuled, sa legal spouse mapupunta ang naiwang assets.

      Delete
    5. 12:07 uy nangyayari yan, mahirap na nagsikap bilang single mom after mahiwalay. Umunlad ang negosyo. Technically, conjugal property parin dahil nga walang divorce kahit na matagal nang hiwalay. This is why we need divorce.

      Delete
  15. Stop making this a gender issue.
    Marami rin kababaihan ang may ayaw sa Divorce at marami rin kalalakihan ang Pro-Divorce.
    Yung mga ganitong comment ng mga popular personalities ang nagiging dahilan kaya nagkakaroon ng gender stigma.
    This way of thinking should be halted ❗️

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yun nga din napansin ko, sana nag-concentrate na lang si Anne sa listahan ng senators. By emphasizing kasi the gender thing hindi na rin mabibigyan ng credit yung mga tumindig sa divorce na senators, mapa-lalaki or babae man sila.

      Delete
    2. Kaya nga. Sa senate nagkataon lang na maraming lalaki ang may ayaw sa Divorce pero hindi ibig sabihin na ganyan din outside the Senate or in the real world.

      Delete
    3. Chill lang at konting reading comprehension. This is not a gender issue but an astute observation, esp dun sa post ni Anne.

      Delete
    4. 8:40 ano pinagsasabi mo, ibinase ni anne ang comment nya sa mga senators na nag-no. SENATORS! huwag kang masyadong overthinker.

      Delete
    5. Pero fact naman yung sinabi niya. May babae ba sa nag NO? Yes or no?

      Delete
    6. Her comment is stating a fact!!!

      Delete
    7. Nakikita ko sa social media na ang mga against naman talaga eh mga lalaki at mga middle aged to matatanda ng kababaihan. Sabi pa, sila daw kung sila daw natiis nila, magtiis din daw tayo. Meron pa sabi, kahit magdusa sila, hinding hindi nila bibigyan ng kaligayahan mga kabit ng asawa nila. Ano kaya buhay nila at mga anak nila sa loob ng pamilyang ganyan? Anyare sa mental health at pagpapahalaga sa sarili?

      Delete
    8. lol. sana nagiisip ka muna bago magcomment. yun post ni Anne na puro ay lalaki ay pertaining sa gender ng mga nag No sa Senate. not the pertaining in general na lahat ng lalaki ay no sa divorce and vice versa.

      Delete
    9. For lawmakers, interesting na lahat ng babae and a muslim is pro divorce. Pero yung mga lalake, no.

      It is a gender issue. Our laws were made by people without uteruses hence lugi ang babae lagi. Hello from Maggie Wilson on Concubinage versus Adultery, no? Kamusta ang walang silbing child support, kaya maraming nagba-Baguio as a friend? And the pathetic laws on inheritance na nasa patriarchial line mapupunta ang kayamanan ng isang babae na walang will?

      Now na lumalakas ang presence ng females sa congress at senate, nagkaka-progressive laws na. Slow pero at least meron.

      Kaya yan Pilipinas! Yes to divorce!

      Delete
    10. It’s a valid, you woke should stop labeling everything according to what’s trending. Shezzz kalma. It’s a demographic that is glaring to be MEN! It’s not sexism, it’s reality.

      Delete
  16. Ang ironic ng NO ni chiz.

    Heller sya nga 2nd marriage na nya.
    Bigyan naman din nya ng opportunity ung iba na magkaroon ng 2nd chance!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 900PM,true,makasarili yan g mambabatas na yan.

      Delete
    2. walang ironic duon accla. kung puedi naman makawala sa kasal tru annulment, bakit pa magpapasa ng batas sa diborsyo. ganun.

      Delete
    3. Ironic by Alanis Morisette ata favorite song ni Chiz ngayon...

      Delete
    4. 11:09 accla check difference of annulment and divorce. Libre google. Thank me later.

      Delete
    5. 11:09, hindi lahat afford niyan at napakahaba ng proseso. Kaya nga mayayaman lang may access jan.

      Delete
    6. di rin, kapitbahay namin nakapagpa annulment naman kahit parehong teachers lang sweldo. kung talagang pasok sa requirements ma a-annuled yung kasal. yung mga gumagastos ng malaki yung pinagpipilitan na pasok sa requirement ng annulment yung sitwasyon nila, maghahire ng mga expert witness para lang magpatunay kuno sa mga non exixtent na mga reasons. kaya napapagastos.

      Delete
    7. 1:01 bat ung kapitbahay namin, nanlalaki si wife, iniwan ang mga maliliit na anak kay husband at sumama sa iba. Bat hindi pa din ma-approve ang annulment? 5 yrs bago nadismiss, hindi nagrant ung annulment

      Delete
  17. Tandaan ko ang mga senators na nag NO but I won't vote for Robin Padilla. He is a big Joke in the senate at yung ginawa ng asawa nya sa senate office. Never forget mga kababayans.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What did she do

      Delete
    2. yung mga nag YES din tatandaan namin, at madami kami. hello midterm elections 2025.

      Delete
  18. Ano relevance ng gender? Ano gusto iimply ng nagpapakawitty jan? Lol.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 9:14 hanggat di natatapos ang pag-ulit mo tungkol sa gender, di kita tatantanan 8:40. di mo ba gets na mga senador ang usapan dito??!! hina mo naman, you should be halted.LOL

      Delete
    2. Takot kasi ang lalake sa alimony. Plus division of estate esp sa mga may pera.

      Delete
    3. kapag hindi no fault ang divorce, ung may mga side chicks at 2nd 3rd 4th family lagot pag nagdivorce. hati lahat ng properties nun at ang laki ng babayadang alimony. kaya madaming powerful men (politicians) na ayaw sa divorce. malaking pera mawawala sa kanila

      Delete
    4. Goodbye, lifestyles of the playboys and the kabitchinas! Can't wait!

      Delete
    5. 12:48pm you can wait till kingdom come.

      Delete
  19. Gawin nlng mabilis at mura ang annulment kung ayaw ng divorce

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Parang ewan lang kasi annulment, pinipilit nyo na umpisa palang null and void na ang marriage to begin with. Unlike divorce na malinaw ang grounds.

      Delete
  20. Dear AC, voting has consequences :D :D :D Next time kasi, vote wisely ;) ;) ;) Puro babaero ang gusto nyong ilagay sa gobyerno ha ha :D :D :D

    ReplyDelete
  21. Sorry mabilis kasi ang processing ng divorce kesa sa annulment. Kaya sa NO din ako! Hahayaan ko mamatay sa inggit ang babae ng asawa ko na 8 years na hindi parin magamit apelyido ng asawa ko. Wala akong pake kahit dala dala ko pangalan niya. Hindi lng ako nasaktan hindi lng magulang ko hindi lng mga anak ko dalawang beses ako na stroke at na M.I. pa ako sa sama ng loob sa kanila tapos hihingin ng pirma kofor annulment? NO! Magdusa kayo!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lol tapos pag bed ridden na asawa mo, ibabalik sayo kasi ikaw ang legal keme hahaha

      Delete
    2. Kung may divorce, don't just get mad, get it all. Hit them where it hurts the most, sa bulsa nila.

      Delete
  22. Ang kapal lang mag NO ni Sen. Chiz. Dapat pala nag stick siya sa first wife niya!

    ReplyDelete
  23. Iiwan kasi sila ng mga asawa nila pag may divorce. 🀭

    ReplyDelete
  24. Chiz said NO because he wanted to make sure na fair for ALL and afford ng mga hindi mayaman. Pls get facts straight first. Hindi lang simple yes or no question eto. There's more to it. What's the point of making a new law and allowing divorce kung hindi fair for all yung law.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah right. So no because hindi accessible sa mahihirap? Pass the bill first, then create an agency that will help spouses who are abused or those who need help after…create means for those who don’t have money to file for a divorce… kung may public school baka pwede rin naman sila gumawa ng ahensya na na pwede makatulong… what matters most is maipasa yung bill. This is actually a no brainer because all the people in the world except those in Vatican, have the right to divorce. Why deny it to the Filipinos? He’s just looking for an alibi I think… no because hindi makikinabang yung mga mahihirap? E pano naman yung mga may kaya? marami rin naman na may kaya ang need ng divorce…yung mga mayayaman nga mas manipulative pa so the wives or husbands also deserve divorce.

      Delete
  25. Takot sa alimony and child support.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Catholic ako, pero yes to divorce ako. Wala pa ako asawa ha. Pero Matagal Tagal pa ito ma approved sad to say :(

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Girl, pag naapprove yan lado kang di makapagasawa, day.. dahil aagawin at papakasalan nag divorciada ang husband mo sana

      Delete
    2. 12:21 ay ang insecure mo nmn po

      Delete
    3. 12.21 baka kamo walang siyang makukuhang pera kapag nagdivorce dahil he will put all his money under the name of other people because of that dreading irreconcilable differences bs na 'yan.

      Delete
  27. The vote for the passing of Divorce should be elevated at the national referendum level. Let each individual be heard, not just politicians who are heavily ‘indebted’ and currying favor for different institutional interests. It is about time that alimony and child support should be front and center in the debate. Philippines touted as predominantly Catholic, and yet, there is the proliferation of children out of wedlock, mistresses, 2nd/3rd families, etc. Shamefully hypocritical.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. trulagen. basta walang maniobrahan ng results ah. naniniwala akong madami pa ding pinoy ang conservatives na ayaw sa diborsyo. yung mga liberated bullies at maiingay hanggang social media nalang kayo.

      Delete
    2. Medyo hindi mo nageta si OP. English kasi hahaha

      Delete
    3. Especially the irreconcilable differences. Personally, I don't like that to be included in the grounds for divorce because there is a big chance that people will use that to extort alimony.

      Delete
    4. hindi kami matitinag sa mga argumentum ad hominem nyong mga liberal bullies. kaya hahaha din 8:38pm

      Delete
  28. Say yes na. Maggie Wilson deserves it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And her husband too! He deserves freedom from her!

      Delete
    2. Eh di sana hindi na lang nagpakasal.

      Delete
    3. 5:06 I'm willing to bet they would consider going back in time & take it back if they have the option to time travel. But people get married with the best of intentions & no matter how much you try to know the person beforehand sometimes you just can't tell the future. The most the government can do for people in dysfunctional relationships is give them the option to restart their lives and move on. Not just dismiss their situation with "edi sana di ka nagpakasal" and leave them to languish.

      Delete
    4. As if naman walang options sa batas. May petitions for declaration of nullity, annulment, legal separation. E di iamend niyo yung family code to add grounds para malinaw kung ano yang dinadagdag as grounds to dissolve the marriage or separate. I’m sure kaya pinipilit yang divorce para sa ground na irreconcilable differences. My foot. Gagawin nyo lang convenient for philanderers. Akala mo nagpapalit lang ng damit kung magpalit bg asawa. Waiting na ang mga homewreckers na maipasa yan.

      Delete
    5. 11.15 I don't like that irreconcilable differences as well. Because it sounds like anybody who wants out can just make any reason just to get divorce. And the person who did not cheat nor hit the other party physically, will pay alimony. That is unfair. Divorce should NOT be a way for extortion! Congress should have done some research on the countries that have high divorce rates. Pero wala kasi instead of attacking the grounds of this proposed divorce bill, they tackled about the religion. WTH! Hay naku! Kung ganyan din lang pala wala ng mag-aasawa or maybe those people who still wants to get married will just put their properties to other people's name para walang mahuthut 'yong fraudster.

      Delete
    6. 11:15, ang ayaw ng divorce ay dahil takot sa hatian ng properties at spousal support. Lahat ng sinabi mo ay dahilan lang kunwari, pero hindi iyan ang totoong reason nila.

      Delete
  29. mga lalakeng takot mawalan ng comfort zone pero di nmn loyal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. loyal sila kaya nga ayaw ng divorce, pero hindi nila kaya maging faithful

      Delete
  30. Spain nga may divorced e e diba sila ang nag ano ng isang religion sa Pinas, e ang pinas feeling naman LOL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ano naman. isn't it the pount kaya nakipaglaban si bonfacio at nagpaka martyr si rizal sa luneta so that pinoys wouldn't have to care what spanish think. so yeah feeling talaga kasi may sarili kaming opinyon.

      Delete
    2. 11:18 Dinamay mo na rin lang si Rizal, sana inalam mo na rin stance nya. He NEVER wanted freedom from Spain. Ang gusto nya ay maging probinsya ng Espanya ang Pilipilinas para technically speaking eh Espanyol na rin tayo. At dahil may divorce sa Spain, magkaka-divorce din sa Pinas kung nasunod ang gusto ni Rizal.

      Delete
    3. but his martyrdom coupled with his writings paves the way for the struggle and eventual war for independence. di bala?

      Delete
  31. If they dont want divorce in the Phil, at least address sana other marital issues and make it pro women den, revise certain laws that make ut fair for both men and women

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Make it fair for men and women pero make it pro women? Ano ba talaga, tita?

      Delete
  32. I get that other people dont want divorce, especially religious sects, expected yan ke Villanueva na mag no, pero sana give other options, say no to divorce all you want but offer some options nmn or make a law that fair to both men and women.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Really crazy Philippine system like wth 🀦‍♀️ mga bwesit arghhhhhh!!!

    ReplyDelete
  34. I think nag no si chiz kasi May mga kailangan pang baguhin sa bill ngayon like about the pao lawyers.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Bakit ba kasi nagpapakasal tapos magdidivorce? Wg kayo magpakasal diba kung maghihiwalay din. Dpat ilista nyo na red flags na mga karelasyon nyo bago kayo pakasal!

    ReplyDelete
  36. As lawmakers, hindi dapat subjective ang vote nila. Kung anong sigaw ng mamamayan yun ang pakinggan nila. Sa mga nag-no, you are freaking lucky to have a happy and healthy marriage. But what about those who are abused in any form? Naisip nyo ba yon?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. yung sigaw ng maiiingay sa social media katulad mo? wala pa kayo sa 20% buong populasyon ng pilipinas. ee-impose nyo na naman yang liberalidad ninyo sa buong pilipinas?

      Delete
  37. Kunti lang naman mga babaeng senador.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Kawawa tayo dito sa PH naiiyak nalang ako . Walang kwentang mga pulitiko puro sariling kapakanan ng iniisip

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ikaw din sariling kapakanan din naman iniisip mo diba. gusto mo divorce para easy peasy ang kasalan at hiwalayan. easy way out. e di pansariling kapakanan din yun. huli sa sariling bibig ang isdang to.

      Delete
  39. My mom now 70 years old was married to my emotionally abusive father, he always borrow my mom’s money because he had another family (8 kids) and never paid it back. Come year 2000 my mom was really fed up and had the guts to check if their marriage was valid. She found out my dad was already married first to the his other wife. So she kicked him out of the house! It was a good thing their marriage was null and void. So We need divorce here in PH

    ReplyDelete
  40. Tanong lang. Pag naapprovahan ang divorce bill ibig sabihin pwede na maging malaya diba don sa unang kasal tapos pwede magpakasal ulit.. paano pag pangalawa na or pangatlo and so on, magdivorce ulit para bang paulit ulit lang na kinasal tapos divorce kasi may problema, pwede ba yun? Unlimited ang kasal?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kailangan pa rin ang hatian ng properties at spousal support sa lahat. Kaya nga takot ang mga politicians.

      Delete
    2. Yes. Pero siguro naman if twice divorced na yung lalaki mag-iisip na yung soon-to-be 3rd wife di ba?

      Delete
    3. Womanizer < Money and Properties.

      ganon pala mga lalaki.

      Delete
    4. ay di na mag iisip si soon to be 3rd wife. may divorce naman, may pa alimony pa. shala.

      Delete
  41. If the grounds for divorce are physical violence, homosexuality of the respondent, marital infidelity, concealing a sexually transmitted disease at the time of marriage, there is a big chance that it will become law.

    Pero kung dadagdagan ng irreconcilable differences, drug addiction, alcoholism, chronic gambling, I'm afraid it won't get passed.

    Well, there's an annulment though. They just need to add some of the grounds that I mentioned in the first paragraph to make it accessible to many people.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Kudos s amga kalalakihan na ayaw sa divorce kasi may takot sila sa Diyos alam nila na banal ang kasal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Takot mabawasan ang kayamanan nila kaya ayaw nila.

      Delete
    2. Pffft hindi naman takot sa Diyos majority ng mga lalake na yan. Sabihin mo they want to have their Cake and eat it too! Andyan si Misis to take care of him, his home, and the kids. Tapos meron din syang side chick. Kasi Pag may divorce baka mag expect pa Yun side chick na papakasalan sya. And Pag may divorce baka natauhan si Misis and Iwan sya! Hard Facts!

      Delete
    3. 11:20 bawal yang sa huli ang pagsisisi dapat hindi nalang nya pinakasalan in the first place at wg sya paanak!

      Delete
  43. Pag kasal na kayo wag na maghiwalay kaya nga binigyan kayo ng Diyos ng kalayaan kahit pa kasalanan gawin nyo nagagawa nyo naman.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. u mean wag na pakasal sa iba

      Delete
  44. Dapat once lang puede magasawa isang tao unless namatay na spouse. No to divorce

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. wala kang puso. daming nabubugbog na di makalaya

      Delete
    2. Hahahhahaha sana di ka totoo

      Delete
    3. 2:23 Ano yuck dun eh yan naman talaga ang tama dahil ang marriage whether or not ginawa sa church should be regarded inviolable. Kaya nga nagpapakasal diba?

      Delete
    4. o edi good luck galingan mo ha wag na wag kang magkakamali napakagaling mo e

      Delete
    5. at talaga. di na ako magpapakasal if not sure ako sa partner ko.

      Delete
    6. 12:19 Tama ito. Yung mga nag yuck, kayo ang nasa maling pananaw. Mas lalong wala ng seseryoso sa sagradong pagsasama dahil may easy ticket way out na.

      Delete
  45. Pag boto sa divorce wag na magsimba

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sus dami palasimba pero may mga kabit.

      Delete
  46. I can't wait for penas to pass this bill :D :D :D It will be fun watching people divorcing left and right ;) ;) ;) Got bored with your marriage?? :) :) :) Divorced :D :D :D Want to hook up with the rich neighbor? Divorced :D :D :D Want to trade in for a younger version? Divorced :) :) :) Its like opening Pandora's box :) :) :) Let's go penas :D :D :D

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oo sarap panuorin.pinaka madaming kinakasal, sa Pinas at pinaka madaming naghihiwalay at the same time pinaka relihiyosong bansa. Talagang piliin mo ang Pilipinas sabi nga sa kanta. LOL

      Delete
    2. syempre hindi naman ganon kadali yon, may pera din involved for sure at sa pinas pa ba na napakabagal ng processing, baka abutin din ng taon. Meron or walang divorced marami pa din naman kumakabit, nagloloko, at nanakit.

      Delete
  47. NO TO DIVORCE. Ang pag-aasawa hindi parang mainit na kanin na pag isinubo mo at napaso ka pwede mo iluwa. Pinasok mo pangatawanan mo. Gusto palagi may easy way out. Hindi divorce ang sagot sa katigasan ng ulo. Mag-aral at makinig sa pangaral ng magulang!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @1016 wala na say Yun mga magulang sa pagsasama ng mag asawa.

      Delete
    2. 10∶16,aysus,sige nga iharang mo yung katawan mo kapag tinopak yung mister na nambubugbog,pati anak nyo di rin pinatawad dahil pinagbubuhatan din ng kamay.

      Delete
  48. 11:27 they can add domestic abuse as a ground for annulment. other grounds for divorce bill are flimsy. divorce is being pushed by many to address shortcomings of existing remedies, including cost and length of process. that’s failure of system that can be addressed without need to pass another law

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Walang hatian ng properties sa annulment.

      Delete
  49. paano pala yung mga anak pag nag divorce?lalo kung mga bata pa. magiging illegitimate child na din?

    ReplyDelete
  50. Bakit hindi pasimplehan ang Annulment process kesa magpasa ng Divorce bill? Kasi mga Pilipino, sorry ha maraming unfaithful!!! Gagasgasin lang ang bill na yan at ang church ay hindi na magiging sagrado.

    ReplyDelete
  51. yang mga nag NO pag yan pumasa, sila una magpapadivorce...

    ReplyDelete
  52. serioso ako don sa tanong ko kanina ano mangyayri don sa anak pag ng divorce na magulang nila? Kung meron lang mga lawyers dito o may alam pasagot thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Agree ako sa lahat ng nag YES maliban kay banoy.

    ReplyDelete
  54. In the long run, hinid maganda ang magiging epekto ng divorce sa majority ng tao. Tandaan nyo yan.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sa tingin mo ba not having the legal means to dissove a valid marriage is doing us good right now?

      Delete
  55. Puro naman ganyan si Anne, pero pag kinonfront naman natatameme. Di ko pa rin malimutan yung issue niya dati kung saan nag comment si VP Sara sa IG niya.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Baka naman ayaw na nalang nya magsalita para walang gulo kasi abt politics yan.

      Delete

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...