Sunday, September 27, 2020

DepEd Releases Statement on Sexually Double-meaning Questions in Module

Image courtesy of Facebook: Reyson Lee


Images courtesy of Twitter: DepEd_PH

33 comments:

  1. Psycho for me kung sinuman gumawa ng book/ question na yun. Di mailabas siguro ang init. Gggrrrr!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The scary part is that he/she could be a sexual predator.

      Delete
  2. Minsan kasi mga netizens kung makapost, gobyerno agad kinucall out tapos sinishare ng mga tao without fact checking. Material to sa Catholic school pa to sa lagay na to ha. Hahaha.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Mga tao kasi kinucall out agad ang gobyerno without delving into the details. Then citizens automatically share it without fact checking.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Someone is going to be in deep sh*t.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Natawa ako dun hahaha. Pero seriously, paano nakalusot yan?. "Private Catholic school" pa man din

    ReplyDelete
  6. I hope this is an isolated case with just that one catholic school involved. Do they not review their materials before passing it on to their children?someone should be reprimanded for this vulgar module. DepEd, please follow up on this.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Lol, typical woke strikes again, shunga levels din,tinag yung DepEd but di tinag yung school? One sided tayo fren? And you're sister is old enough not to be offended over a name. A name?!! Lahat na lang. We have a family friend na police Eli Panti and his sister Alice Panti pa nga.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nabasa mo ba yung post? He clearly mentioned that he is not blaming DepEd but he wants to bring it to their attention. Kahit private school yun under pa din yun ng DepEd at sila ang gagawa ng action dyan.

      Delete
    2. True! snowflakes...

      Delete
    3. Di rin 6:55 am, balat sibuyas lang kamo. What a cry baby

      Delete
    4. 6.55 ang punto niya is yong pagiging onesided nung nagpost alam mo yan pero ang hindi ko maintindihan ay kung bakit iba sinagot mo.

      Delete
    5. I hate the cancel culture snowflakes but did you even see the names they used in the module? Akala yata ni author witty sya but that kind of word play is more seen in locker room talks. Kung ako yung magulang paying for my child's education, aba'y mabubwisit din ako sa ganitong quality ng educational module. At teh, ang laking jump ng examples mong "Eli Panti" or "Alice Panti" compared to the ones used dun sa module. Ang baboy.

      Delete
  8. Jusko Lord tatlong beses kubg binasa bago ko nalaman na bastos pala ang name. 😂 Sa school lang ba na yan ang module na yan? Yuck. Catholic pa nman. 🤮

    ReplyDelete
  9. Dapat ma-sampolan ng DepEd yung nag-post nito kasi napaka-malisyoso. Di muna nag-verify.

    Ang malala pa nito, yung mainstream media naman isa din. May viver chat sila at kumalat ito, finorward sa mga sendador. Itong mga senador naman, tinanong si Sec. Briones sa budget hearing. Mabuti prepared siya sa pagsagot na hindi galing sa DepEd ang "module" na ito.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. what do you mean malisyoso? Hindi ba dapat sakanila naman talaga nirereport ito? would you expect the same reaction from deped kung minessage lang sila via dm or email?

      Delete
  10. pag nakita to ni ninoy aquino tiyak never na niyang masasabi ang famous line nyang 'the filipino is worth dying for. ' 🥴 juicolored.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ano naman ang konek ng filipino is worth dying for nung ninoy na yun aber?

      Delete
  11. It only means na tamad ang principal ng school na yan. Didn't bother checking ang mga modules at worksheet and another thing sana naisip nya na di gawa ng deped yan. Simple at basic lang kasi mga nilalagay na topic sa mga public schools just saying.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Baking dami nagrereklamo sa pag tag sa DepEd? Pwede naman sa kanila I-report ang mga ganito. They govern and regulate anything school related.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Naalala ko teacher ko noon nilagay nya sa question pangalan ng jowa nya. Hindi ko matandaan kung mali sinagot ko kasi nabadtrip ako. Crush ko kasi sya hahahah! XC

    ReplyDelete
  14. HINDI po kailanman nagpapasakop ang mga private schools pagdating sa learning materials lalo na sa grading system sa DepEd. Nakakalungkot na hindi na proofread ng mga teachers sa PRIVATE CATHOLIC SCHOOL ang modules.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tama po kayo nung hs kami 95 lang pinakamataas na score and subject teacher din namin ang gumagawa ng questionnaire and books. Wala rin ako nakita mali or bastos kung di pa ako nagbasa ng comment sa fb di ko malalaman. Iba ibabg perspective na lang yan.

      Delete
  15. Dami dinaanan nito for approval before publication. Anyare?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Agree. And those modules are paid for. Grrrr!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Hay .ilang bese ko pa binasa di ko naiintindihan. Ang slow ko, parang yan lang yung book na pang bata.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Ay bakit po hindi sa DepEd nagrireklamo? Hindi jurisdiction nila both public and private schools? Sa DENR ba dapat nagreklamo yung netizen? Dios Mio, ang utak!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ate ghorl tama ka.. Pero may sariling learning module ang private school na di katulad ng binibigay ng deped sa public school. Deped will investigate on this matter pero jurisdiction eto ng ctholic school kasi sila ngpupublish nyan di deped.

      Delete
  19. paulit ulit kong binasa, dko maintindihan panu naging bastos. sorry mga classmates. pwede bang mag explain?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ako rin, baka pwede ipost buong questionnaire. QUestion with names for sure ay may scenario and those names are suppose to be hypothetical. Wala akong kilala maski isa sa mga yan if ever they exist. Chances are the one who reviewed it also don't. Hindi ba mas delikado ang paglagay ng too much attention dito kasi makucurious tuloy ang mga kabataan and will research on it? Like I am curious to do now.

      Delete
    2. ako din po 1:52 di ko maisip na bastos :(

      Delete
  20. Nothing wrong with it. Some people just have dirty minds.

    ReplyDelete