Thursday, February 12, 2026

Raymond Gutierrez Refutes Claims of Sarah Lahbati

Images courtesy of Instagram: mond, sarahlahbati


 

@syrile_2022 AN INTERVIEW WORTH WATCHING FROM SARAH LAHBATI AND KYLIE VERSOZAπŸ’‹#sarahlahbati #kylieversoza #fypspotted #fypp #fyptrending ♬ original sound - ♀️𝑬𝑿𝑢𝑻𝑰π‘ͺ𝑡𝑼𝑹𝑺𝑬♏

Image and Video courtesy of YouTube: Almost honest, TikTok: syrile_2022 


100 comments:

  1. what do you expct from a bitter ex

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yan! Go raymond. Di pwede lagi one sided ang peg lalo na daming issues nyang si ante.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True! Andami na talaga issue ni ate girl pero bulag bulagan parin mga people. Super victim daw sya

      Delete
    2. Everybody loves Raymond!

      Delete
    3. sana sinabi na lang ng deretso. Nagpo-provide si Richard. Hindi yung ginawa pa nyang bida ang sarili nya sa “I would never beg” statement nya. She should have given Richard respect, at the very least, on that part.

      Delete
    4. 1:40 huwag mo akong isali diyan, LOL!

      Delete
    5. I feel him. Ganyan din sa brother ko. Gustong gusto ko ipagtaggol sa mga tsismosa na naniniwala lang sa mga sa socmed o tsismis. Kapag galing sa kapatid ko at sa pamilya namin never pinopost. Hindi alam ng mga taong mapanghusga na kapatid ko lahat ang gumagastos para sa pamangkin ko.

      Delete
  3. Totoo naman siguro kasi wala namang projects si Sarah masyado so paano nya ma provide ang lahat ng need ng kids, Not begging yes kasi kusa naman ata nag bibigay ng sustento si Richard kaya ang labo ni Sarah dyan. Dapat na clarify niya kasi parang ang lumalabas walang sustento si Richard sa kids.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sabi nga ni Ruffa noon napaka generous daw ni Richard sa kanya at sa mga pamangkin ni Richard. Kaya malabo walang sustento mga anak nya kay Sarah

      Delete
    2. True, she never said naman na hiindi nagbibigay. Pero parang may insinuation kasi. But raymond should mind his own business. As someone na ngayon pinapakialaman ng mga in laws.

      Delete
    3. 1225 sa kultura natin hindi pwedeng magsalita ang lalake so si Raymond peede nya defend brother nya lalo na si Richard pla lahat gumagastos for crying out loud. Please S make ur kwento straight. Ur giving wrong notion. Sge kontrahin mo sinabi ni Raymond

      Delete
    4. 1225 ikaw yan. Personally, I can’t be silent too if I know someone’s spewing lies and toxicity againts a loved one. Alam ni Raymond hindi papatol si Richard. Pababayaan na lang ba nya si ex in-law?

      Delete
  4. Ang sabi niya naman is 'not beg'. If R provides then wala naman issue kay SL, basta she wont beg

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, though she should not have left room for doubts.

      Delete
    2. 11:26 she made it sound walang sustento.

      Delete
    3. 1:04 saan mo nakuha n walang sustento. Eh klaro nman kay Sarah na if may sustento, then good. If wala ok lang din sa kanya. Kumbaga walang pilitan.

      Delete
    4. Hirap talaga pag naging full time mom at hindi nag work. Pag wala kang pera, hinuhusgahan ka. See the difference nung kay Ellen. She was praised for being rich. Si Sarah naman naba bash. If you find it na she “sounded like” hindi nagsu support, that’s your understanding of the situation. Comprehension mo yan e.

      Delete
  5. Puro kayo bash kay Barbie, eh Sarah naman talaga may problema!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. madami issue c barbie natural ma ba2sh kht nuon p madami na yn basher.na tulfo nagalmot sa bar.

      Delete
    2. Magaling lang talaga mag tago si SL

      Delete
    3. nega na yn c barbie nuon pa.sa dami nea issue wag mo idahiln c sarah.search mo kung anu ma issue sknya.madami Kya madami xia basher.

      Delete
    4. Iba nman kasi ang issue ni Barbie. Hindi yun nagbabayad ng tama sa kasambahay nya at nangangalmot yun sa bar dahil sa lalaki. Kaloka. Ito nmang kay Sarah at Retsard eh about sa sustento.

      Delete
    5. 12:40Am hindi din. nabubulgar na ang dahilan ng hiwalayan nila ni Richard. Kahit anong paglilinis niyo kay SL marami pala syang ginawang kalokohan. Ingliserang palaka.

      Delete
  6. Hindi nmn sinabi ni Sarah na hindi nagsusustento si Richard. Ang sabi nya hindi sya hihingi or beg for it dahil kaya nmn nya at pagttrabahuhan nya. Sabi nya when it comes to that “it should be automatic” but never syang magaask or beg for it dahil nga automatic nmn na kailangang sustentuhan ni Richard mga anak nya dahil ama sya.

    May hindi lng smooth sa flow ng interview, i get it also since baguhan plang si kylie. So hindi sya nalinaw. Pero never nmn sinabi na hindi nagsusustento. Sana ung interviewer should throw a follow up question na kung nagbibigay ng support ung ama pra sa mga bata kahit hindi nagaask si sarah.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yung tono kasi and pagkakasabi

      Delete
    2. How she said it insinuated something else. Hindi tayo 8080 not to discern that.

      Delete
    3. 12:32 hindi na kasalanan ni Sarah if you are full of malice. Lalo now sa social media na grabe mag imbento ang mga tao. Most of the time, nanunuod na nga lang hindi pa makaintindi.

      Delete
    4. So asumera lang si Raymond?? That what u saying?

      Delete
  7. Sarah should seek legal help to get alimony. She was the legal wife after all and kung walang prenup, half of Chard's income and asset during the marriage ei kanya. kaya you go girl, kunin mo lahat nang sayo - alimony man or child support.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do you think walang prenup yan? Sino ba nanay ni Richard para walang prenup?

      Delete
    2. Kaso hinuhusgahan naman siya

      Delete
    3. You have no idea how dirty and nasty it can get it when it comes to annulment. Lahat ng baho nyo malalabas. And I don’t think Richard will be on the losing end when this happens. Mas maraming baho ang labas about SL, she might eve lose child support if ever. Kaya wag na lang.

      Delete
  8. Wala namang sinabi si Sarah L na hindi nagbibigay si Richard? Ang bully talaga ng mga Gutierrez.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Paanong bully? Gusto lang I clear ni Raymond na nag provide ng maayos si Richard sa mga bata, kung mababasa mo kasi sa ibang site mga comments ng mga tao akala nila hindi nag susustento si Richard kasi nga hindi naman na clarify sa interview, ni walang follow up question si Kylie edi sana na clear agad ang statement ni Sarah.

      Delete
    2. Khit clips lang napanood ko, gets ko nman ibig sabihin ni Sarah na d xa mg bebeg, pro d nya sinasabi na d ngsusustento c Richard.

      Delete
    3. Hindi sila bully te, na babash kasi si Richard kaya kailangan nila magsalita

      Delete
    4. 11:41 hindi ba kayo nakakaintindi sa interview nya eh nakataglish nman si Sarah dun. Wala nmang sinabi na hindi nagsusustento c Richard but she can afford it at as a father dapat walang pilitan at alam na ng tatay ang responsibility nya, tama nman diba? Dapat pa ba nakakaso lahat?

      Delete
    5. When did Raymond become a bully? You would hardly hear from him at all.

      Delete
    6. Yung sinabi nya na "I can do it" insinuating na sya lang ang nagpprovide sa mga anak nya.

      Delete
  9. huh? in which part of the interview na sinabi ni Sara na Richard doesn’t provide for his kids?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree… wala syang sinabi na hinde nag provide si richard.. she said she will kot beg. Yun ang question if she will beg… chill lang kayo..

      Delete
    2. Mga di marunong mag read between the lines. off talaga delivery ni Sarah. She couldve just said na "co-parenting" sila kesa pinagdiinang kumakayod siya para sa mga anak nila, may dapat "automatic" pa at di mag bebeg. So ano dating?

      Delete
  10. Siguro ang point ni S is d naman sya nahinginpero d naman nya sinabi nahindi nag bibigay kasi lang since d nia inelaborate, ang inassume ng iba is di nag bibigay since minention nia na dapat automatic na un. And if hindi mag bigay si R okay lang kasi kaya daw nya. Si K naman as an interviewer dapat yung mga ganitong details inaask nia for transparency kung gusto nya na hindi mag mukhang puchupuchu ang show nya.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Sarah pls get the 50% of RG's money dahil KASAL kayo πŸ‘

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. lol naubos na niya, she’s only entitled to his properties at income during marriage, yan ay kung walang prenup.. sa tingin mo di na inayos ni anabelle yan bago sila kinasal nung 2021

      Delete
    2. ew! kahit d naman nya pinaghirapan? kukunin dahil kasal sila? What a mentality!

      Delete
  12. She said she won't beg - she never said he does not give or provide. It only means she never asked him or won't ask him, ang kusa lang niya.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Then she should have said she doesn't need to beg. Dahil ang notion nun is dahil nagbibigay naman sya. Magiiba kasi meaning for others kapag sinabi mong she won't beg magiinsinuate pa yun ng ibang meaning. And wala naman sinabi masama si Richard. Nilinaw lang nya.

      Delete
  13. Even after years of separation, masarap parin kainin ang ampalaya :D :D :D #Can'tMoveOn ;) ;) ;)

    ReplyDelete
  14. Walang sinabi si Sarah na hindi nagsusustento si Richard. What she meant is that as a single parent she won’t beg. It’s an automatic way to provide as father daw. I watched the whole podcast. Walang lumabas sa bibig ni Sarah na Richard won’t provide.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Are you Sarah? Kung mag reply ka tatlong beses sobrang haba Pa.

      Delete
  15. Di ako fan ni Sarah and for quite sometime, naging fan ako ni RG mulawin days nya. But with the current situation, I wish Sarah will succeed in life and be able to provide for her kids and not be drag by issues surrounding her ex. Mga Gutierrez sanay na sa mga issues at talagang pagtulongan nila ang tao pag may issue isa sa family member nila. Walang laban si S dito. I hope both ex partners can move on with their lives na di makisali yung family members. At lalo na mga netizens/bashers/ tayong nakikitsismis lubayan nlng natin tong dalawa since alam namn natin hiwalay na sila. Let them heal in peace

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bagay nga c Barbie at Richard. Mag eenjoy tayo baks if mauuwi yan sa hiwalayan. C Sarah kasi parang walang plano na patulan ang kacheapan ng mga Gutz, sayang! 🀭

      Delete
    2. ka cheapan daw haha wala ng mas che-cheap pa sa social climber na pinalayas sa bar haha

      Delete
    3. So true. πŸ’―✅

      Delete
  16. she doesn't ask or beg for support for the kids, sinagot lang naman nya ang tanong.. walang follow up question kung nag po-provide ba si RG and she also didn't volunteer the info.. hurt lang siguro ang family na people will think RG is not doing his obligations to the kids

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It was said in wrong tone, yun ang mali. She should have said kahit in passing na nagbibigay naman si R. Dun lang tayo sa tama at totoo.

      Delete
    2. 12:33 hello, hindi mo ba napanuod yung interview ni Sarah o slow ka lang? Ang Obligation ng tatay eh hindi na dapat dinadaan sa kasuhan but kusang nagbibigay. Sabi ni Sarah, walang pilitan at she will not beg kasi she can afford it. In short, walang drama from her.

      Delete
  17. Ang babaeng pa victim. Daming napapabilib porke inglisera hahahaah

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hindi na nya kasalanan if daming inggiterang jologs sa kanya. Lol

      Delete
  18. Ilabas ang mga bank transfers para tumahik babaitang yarn.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Wala nmn sinabi c Sarah

    ReplyDelete
  20. Midleading kasi ang sinabi ni Sarah sa interview . Sadyang sinabi dont beg dont ask e hindi ka obligasyon ni R for your basic needs. Sabi nya single sya dahil malamang may pinirmahan silang dalawa notarized by a Lawyer . At kung nasa poder nya mga kids siya ang mag provide matic un may share ka sa pagsupport sa anak nila. At hindi na sya obligasyon pa kaya nga you dont beg or ask kasi alam niya na hindi na sya obligasyon. Alimony? Mayron ba sa pinas yan? I dont know nagtatanong lanc. At kung mayron ka rights sa kung anuman na acquire niyo ni R during your union bakit wala ka ginagawa to get half of it? Baka naman inubos na ung pera sa banko sa luho? Hindi ipahlaban or baka alam nha lalabas lahat lahat pag lumaban sya? Ano ba kasi ginawa mo na kababalaghan? Anyway daming nabulgar about Sarah na hindi mahirap paniwalaan.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 50% of everything upon legal separation or annulment. It's been the rule since 1988 ammendment. No matter no contribution ng bawat party, everything is conjugal unless may prenup. Kung ano meron si RG, dahil dinpa sila legally separated at kasal pa, matic nun 50% kay SL - sueldo biya, properties niya, businesses, etc. It seems unfair but that's the law. Remember the loses of Kris Aquino to James Yap in hindreds of millions.

      Delete
    2. yung losses ni Kris was her income and properties during marriage, eh wala sya gano mapapala kung during marriage kasi 2021 lang sila kinasal at di na ganun kalakas ang kita ni richard, knowing anabelle na secure na nya yan lahat bago nagpakasala

      Delete
  21. Finally. Yan kasi dahil babae kinampihan na agad. Minsan victim din ang lalaki lalo na sa mga manipulative na katulad nito ni S

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anong finally eh baka low comprehension ka lang at cheap like Raymond and fam. Lol, buti nlanh nakawala na c Sarah dyan. Goodluck Barbie.

      Delete
  22. Misleading naman talaga. She didn’t say it directly, but the way she delivered her message says otherwise.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True, she made it sounds like siya lang gumagastos sa mga bata. Yes, hindi niya sinabi na hindi naghibigay si R pero the way she said na kinakaya niya as single mom and hind nagdedemand/beg for sustento eh it’s like insinuating narin na walang sustento.

      Delete
    2. Exactly bakit ba hirap gumets ng iba dito

      Delete
  23. True talaga na mababa ang mga comprehension ng mga Pinoy.Ang mga netizens puro husga, kaya napa comment si Raymond na kung tutuusin wla namang sinabi si Sarah na hindi nagsusustento ang ex nya.Napanood ko ang interview.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hahaha, ano pang aasahan mo baks. Pero ang cheap talaga ng mga Gutierez pagdating sa mga issues nila. Tatahimik din nman ang mga yan kapag nasupla just like Anabil. Yung anak nya pala ang maraming issue maski she was insinuating na si Sarah ang may kasalanan. Wala nmang mailabas against Sarah.

      Delete
    2. Wala ka ring comprehension 1:01 Read between the lines kaya

      Delete
  24. legal wife naman si sarah so may financial support din sya aside yung sa kids.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. walang Law ng alimony satin. dito sa US whoever has higher income mababae or lalaki sya ang mag alinony like Britney did to her ex husband

      Delete
  25. Di lang pala ako, ang dating nga kasi sa interview niya parang siya lang ang gumagastos sa mga anak nila.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. this is expected from SL to say this kind of things so that people will insinuate and talk more about her. all along she's always been prententious. she likes, seeks and badly needs attention nowadays.

      Delete
  26. Go mond! Tama na yung nanahimik ang pamilya Gutierrez para lang walang gulo. Hinhanap naman ata nung bitter ex wife ang gulo so slap her with FACTS. Sa pagkakasabi niya para bang kahit nag hihirap siya hindi siya mag bebeg.. Dapat nilinaw niya. She never needed to beg because everything was provided by richard.

    ReplyDelete
  27. The question was if she were asking for help, she answered no. Di naman sinabi na her ex is not providing the needs of their kids.πŸ™„

    ReplyDelete
  28. Single parent does not always mean single provider. However, she shouldn’t havef claimed to be a single parent, stick to co-parenting.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Since they are still married, technically, both SL and RG are entitled to their conjugal properties no matter who between the 2 of them contributed more. In terms of panggastos sa needs ng kids, both of them are responsible. She provides dahil nasa poder niya, he contributes dahil responsibilidad din ng husband niya (di pa sila annulled). Thus she doesn't need to beg, its a legal responsibility. In fact, if they legally separate or annul, ang batas ay nagsasabi na 50% ang hatian between the ex couple. Obviously, mukhang talo si RG dito dahil siya ang mas malaki na contribution, pero just like Kris Aquino who lost hundreds of millions to James Yap, pag walang prenup, ganyan ang hatian. If SL is wise, she should go for the legal separation and take half of it all - properties, businesses, bank balance. Pero mukhang good girl pa rin naman si SL at walang move towards this hatian. Naku pagseguro napuno yan, RG will face giant losses.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kung hindi takot si Sarah may maexpose sa kanya she will push this

      Delete
    2. knowing anabelle do you think walang prenup yan? and isa pa kasikatan at kalakasan ni Richard kumita what when he was single, at kailan lang naman sila kinasal 2021 lang ata di na ganun kasikat at kalakas kumit si richard

      Delete
    3. May annulment si Kris and James, na null and void from the start. Ang mali ni Kris ay inilagay niya ang pangalan ni James sa mga properties at assets niya kaya naging may-ari rin si James. Doon siya natalo.

      Delete
  30. She made it sound like mag-isa nyang pinapasan ang pagkamagulang. any opportunity to be the hero. the strong, independent woman kuno.

    ReplyDelete
  31. All along akala ko hindi bitter tong si Ateng pero kahit gaano kaganda ka magsalita lumabas pa din ung totoo na bitter ka Sarah!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. obviously bitter. mawala ba naman source ng lifestyle niya

      Delete
  32. Yeah, I watched this podcast and the way she said it parang lumalabas na di kusang nagsusustento si Richard but that would be impossible knowing how closely knit and how they value family. Given her the benefit of the doubt but it seems sya talaga ang may issues…

    ReplyDelete
  33. Buti naman may nagsalita na, para naman kasing pinapalabas nya walang ambag ang ama, “meron pang di naman hinihingi” na akala mo talaga deadbeat yung tatay, kaloka to si anteh masabi lang na independent eh g na g nga sana maging nepo gf haha naharang lang

    ReplyDelete
  34. yung title din naman ng podcast ay "almosthonest" so meaning yung pinagsasabi dyan sa mga interviewees ay hindi lahat totoo. kasi almost honest lang. yung may halong intrigera talaga at pagdududa sa manonood.

    ReplyDelete
  35. I don’t think Kylie is a good host. She doesn’t seem to know how to ask good questions. And yes, Sarah should have mentioned that Richard also gives child support to the kids to be fair for Richard also.

    ReplyDelete
  36. She should have said na, she didn't have to beg and or ask for support coz regular naman nagbibigay and if time comes na walang bigay she don't want to beg kc kaya nya. THERE no negative insinuation

    ReplyDelete
  37. She could have said it and answered the questions directly para walang doubts. Kung tinanong sia ng nagprovide ba ang father, then answer it with yes. Mag pa work hard work hard pa siang nalalaman at idiin na sya ang provider sa kids without needing help from R.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Sarah said: I can do it so I dont see why I should ask period.

    Jan pa lng, iisipin n ng tao na si sarah ang ngpprovide for the kids. Periodt.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Bakit ang daming umiiyak sa interview ni Sarah? Haha! Go Sarah! A single mom of 2 deserves all the blessings.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Yes wala nga sinabi si S na hindi nagbibigay si R pero if you would read it between the lines, iba kasi ang dating nya. Sana nilinaw na lang nya na in fairness nagbibigay naman si R even if she doesn’t ask for it.

    May sinabi pa si S na she doesn’t want to be a soldier for life so ang dating nyon is sya lang ang kumakayod para buhayin mga anak nya.

    ReplyDelete